Measuring science-based science linkage and non-science-based linkage of patents through non-patent references

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 488-498

  Sung, Hui Yun ^a   Wang, Chun Chieh ^b   Huang, Mu Hsuan ^b   Chen, Dar Zen ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Non patent references; Patent citations; Science linkage

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS; NON-PATENT REFERENCES; PATENT CITATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE LINKAGE; SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES; TEXAS INSTRUMENTS; UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84930679400     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: 18755879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Acosta M., Coronado D. Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents. Research Policy 2003, 32(10):1783-1803.
2. Anderson J., Williams K., Seemungal D., Narin F., Olivastro D. Human genetic technology: Exploring the links between science and innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 1996, 8(2):135-156.
3. Bhattacharya S., Meyer M. Large firms and the science-technology interface: Patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films. Scientometrics 2003, 58(2):265-279.
4. Boyack K.W., Klavans R. Measuring science-technology interaction using rare inventor-author names. Journal of Informetrics 2008, 2(3):173-182.
5. Breschi S., Catalini C. Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks. Networks, power and relations: First NPR workshop 2009.
6. Chen C., Hicks D. Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics 2004, 59(2):199-211.
7. Coward H.R., Franklin J.J. Identifying the science-technology interface: Matching patent data to a bibliometric model. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1989, 14(1):50-77.
8. Fagerberg J. A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Research Policy 1987, 16(2-4):87-99.
9. Gupta V.K. References to literature in patent documents: A case study of CSIR in India. Scientometrics 2006, 68(1):29-40.
10. Hall B.H., Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools 2001, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
11. Han Y. Measuring industrial knowledge stocks with patents and papers. Journal of Informetrics 2007, 1(4):269-276.
12. Hicks D., Breitzman A., Hamilton K., Narin F. Research excellence and patented innovation. Science and Public Policy 2000, 27(5):310-320.
13. Hullmann A., Meyer M. Publications and patents in nanotechnology. Scientometrics 2003, 58(3):507-527.
14. Klitkou A., Gulbrandsen M. The relationship between academic patenting and scientific publishing in Norway. Scientometrics 2010, 82(1):93-108.
15. Lo S.S. Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: A case of genetic engineering research. Scientometrics 2010, 82(1):109-120.
16. Meyer M. Patents citing scientific literature: Is the relationship causal or casual?. IPTS report, No. 28 1998, 11-18.
17. Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 2000, 29(3):409-434.
18. Meyer M. What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics 2000, 49(1):93-123.
19. Narin F. Globalization of research, scholarly information, and patents-ten year trends. The Serials Librarian 1991, 21(2-3):33-44.
20. Narin F. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 1994, 30(1):147-155.
21. ® background paper. From knowledge management to strategic competence 2000, 155-195. Imperial College Press, London. J. Tidd (Ed.).
22. Narin F., Albert M., Kroll P., Hicks D. Inventing our future: The link between Australian patenting and basic science 2000, Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/00_02.pdf (accessed 01.02.14).
23. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., Olivastro D. Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology. Research Evaluation 1995, 5(3):183-187.
24. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 1997, 26(3):317-330.
25. Narin F., Olivastro D. Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy 1992, 21(3):237-249.
26. United States Patent and Trademark Office Country codes 2014, Retrieved from http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/help/helpctry.htm (accessed 01.12.14).
27. United States Patent and Trademark Office Manual of patent examining procedures 2014, Retrieved from http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/ (accessed 13.08.14).
28. Park H., Kang J. Patterns of scientific and technological knowledge flows based on scientific papers and patents. Scientometrics 2009, 81(3):811-820.
29. Rosenberg N., Birdzel L.E. Science, technology and the Western miracle. Scientific American 1990, 263(5):42-54.
30. Sirilli G. Conceptualising and measuring technological innovation. IDEA report, 1, 3 1998, IDEA.
31. Sorenson O., Fleming L. Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy 2004, 33(10):1615-1634.
32. Tijssen R.J.W. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy 2001, 30(1):35-54.
33. Tijssen R.J.W. Science dependence of technologies: Evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy 2002, 31(4):509-526.
34. Tijssen R., Buter R., van Leeuwen T. Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics 2000, 47(2):389-412.
35. Verbeek A., Debackere K., Luwel M., Andries P., Zimmermann E., Deleus F. Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics 2002, 54(3):399-420.