Measuring science-technology interaction using rare inventor-author names

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 173-182

  Boyack, Kevin W ^a   Klavans, Richard ^a  

^a SciTech Strategies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Inventor author matching; Patent distributions; Patent mapping; Rare names; Science technology interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 47149118919     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2008.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Balconi M., Breschi S., and Lissoni F. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy 33 (2004) 127-145
2. Bassecoulard E., and Zitt M. Patents and publications: The lexical connection. In: Moed H.F., Glänzel W., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of SandT systems (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 665-694
3. Batagelj V., and Mrvar A. Pajek-A program for large network analysis. Connections 21 2 (1998) 47-57
4. Bonaccorsi A., and Thoma G. Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano-science and technology. Research Policy 36 6 (2007) 813-831
5. Boyack K.W., Klavans R., and Börner K. Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64 3 (2005) 351-374
6. Carpenter M.P., and Narin F. Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence. World Patent Information 5 3 (1983) 180-185
7. Cassiman B., Glennisson P., Verbeek A., and van Looy B. Measuring industry-science links through inventor-author relations: A profiling methodology. Scientometrics 70 2 (2007) 379-391
8. Coward H.R., and Franklin J.J. Indentifying the science-technology interface: Matching patent data to a bibliometric model. Science, Technology and Human Values 14 1 (1989) 50-77
9. Forti E., Franzoni C., and Sobrero M. The effect of patenting on the networks and connections of academic scientists. In: Torres-Salinas D., and Moed H. (Eds). Proceedings of the 11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics. Madrid, Spain (2007) 272-284
10. Glänzel W., and Meyer M. Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations. Scientometrics 58 2 (2003) 415-428
11. Hicks D., Tomizawa H., Saitoh Y., and Kobayashi S. Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of federally funded research in the United States. Research Evaluation 13 2 (2004) 78-86
12. King D.A. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430 (2004) 311
13. Klavans R., and Boyack K.W. Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 2 (2006) 251-263
14. Klavans R., and Boyack K.W. Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science. Scientometrics 68 3 (2006) 475-499
15. Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29 (2000) 409-434
16. Meyer M. Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 51 1 (2001) 163-183
17. Meyer M. Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems. Scientometrics 54 2 (2002) 193-212
18. Meyer M. Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness. Research Evaluation 12 1 (2003) 17-27
19. Meyer M. Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy 35 (2006) 1646-1662
20. Murray F. Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy 31 (2002) 1389-1403
21. Narin F., and Olivastro D. Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy 21 (1992) 237-249
22. Narin F., and Olivastro D. Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics 41 1-2 (1998) 51-59
23. Noyons E.C.M., Buter R.K., van Raan A.F.J., Schmoch U., Heinze T., Hinze S., et al. Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Nanoscience and nanotechnology: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) (2003), Leiden University, The Netherlands
24. Noyons E.C.M., van Raan A.F.J., Grupp H., and Schmoch U. Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research. Research Policy 23 4 (1994) 443-457
25. Tijssen R.J.W., and Korevaar J.C. Unravelling the cognitive and interorganisational structure of public/private RandD networks: A case study of catalysis research in the Netherlands. Research Policy 25 8 (1997) 1277-1293
26. Verbeek A., DeBackere K., Luwel M., Andries P., Zimmermann E., and Deleus F. Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics 54 3 (2002) 399-420
27. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2006). International Patent Classification, eighth edition, from http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/ipc8/.