Mapping landscape services: A case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in the Netherlands

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 24, Issue , 2013, Pages 273-283

  Gulickx, M M C ^a   Verburg, P H ^b   Stoorvogel, J J ^a   Kok, K ^a   Veldkamp, A ^c  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; GIS; Indicators; Landscape functions; Multifunctionality; Spatial characteristics

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; DATA SOURCE; DIFFERENT SERVICES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FOOD PRODUCTION; GROUND OBSERVATIONS; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; NEIGHBOURHOOD; NETHERLANDS; POLICY MAKERS; RURAL LANDSCAPES; SITE-SPECIFIC; SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS; SPATIAL INDICATORS; SPATIAL VARIATIONS; WETLAND HABITATS;

ANIMALS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS); WATER QUALITY;

FORESTRY;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BIOINDICATOR; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOOD PRODUCTION; GIS; MAPPING METHOD; POLICY MAKING; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RURAL LANDSCAPE; WATER QUALITY; WETLAND;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; GIS; INDICATORS; NETHERLANDS; WATER QUALITY;

NETHERLANDS; NORTH BRABANT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84864195157     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AHN, 2002. Actueel Hoogtebestand Nederland (Current Elevation database the Netherlands). Rijkswaterstaat, Delft, the Netherlands. http://www.ahn.nl
2. C.H.M. Bont de '...Al het merkwaardige in bonte afwisseling...' Een historische geografie van Midden- en Oost-Brabant 1993 Stichting Brabants Heem Waalre
3. B. Burkhard, F. Kroll, S. Nedkov, and F. Müller Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets Ecol. Indic. 21 2011 17 29
4. K.M.A. Chan, M.R. Shaw, D.R. Cameron, E.C. Underwood, and G.C. Daily Conservation planning for ecosystem services PLoS Biol. 4 2006 e379
5. CHW Brabant, 2006. Map Cultural Historical Value, Digital Atlas Province Noord-Brabant. [Online] http://www.brabant.nl/kaarten/culturele-kaarten/ cultuurhistorische-waardenkaart-2010.aspx
6. R. Costanza, R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital Ecol. Econ. 25 1997 3 15
7. R. de Groot Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes Landsc. Urban Plann. 75 2006 175 186
8. R. de Groot, and L. Hein Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales Multifunct. Land Use 2007 15 36
9. R.S. de Groot, R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making Ecol. Complex. 7 2010 260 272
10. R.S. DeFries, J.A. Foley, and G.P. Asner Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function Front. Ecol. Environ. 2 2004 249 257
11. de Vries, F.; 2008. Nationaal Hydrologisch Instrumentarium NHI. Modelrapportage, deelrapport Bodem. Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
12. B. Egoh, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D.M. Richardson, D.C. Le Maitre, and A.S. van Jaarsveld Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 127 2008 135 140
13. G.L.A. Fry Multifunctional landscapes - towards transdisciplinary research Landsc. Urban Plann. 57 2001 159 168
14. A. Gimona, and D. van der Horst Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland Landsc. Ecol. 22 2007 1255 1264
15. Google Earth 5.1, 2009. Satellite images, 51°24′N 5°48′E. http://earth.google.com
16. R. Haines-Young, M. Potschin, and F. Kienast Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs Ecol. Indic. 21 2012 39 53
17. L. Hein, K. van Koppen, R.S. de Groot, and E.C. van Ierland Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services Ecol. Econ. 57 2006 209 228
18. J. Holmes Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda J. Rural Stud. 22 2006 142 160
19. F. Kienast, J. Bolliger, M. Potschin, R. de Groot, P. Verburg, I. Heller, D. Wascher, and R. Haines-Young Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe Environ. Manage. 44 2009 1099 1120
20. MA Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis 2005 Island Press Washington, DC
21. S. Menard Applied Logistic Regression Analysis 2001 Sage University Paper, Sage Thousand Oaks, USA
22. M. Pérez-Soba, S. Petit, L. Jones, N. Bertrand, V. Briquel, L. Omodei-Zorini, C. Contini, K. Helming, J.H. Farrington, M.T. Mossello, D. Wascher, F. Kienast, and R. Groot Land use functions - a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability Sustain. Impact Assess. Land Use Changes 2008 375 404
23. R.G. Pontius, and L.C. Schneider Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ. 85 2001 239 248
24. H. Posthumus, J.R. Rouquette, J. Morris, D.J.G. Gowing, and T.M. Hess A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England Ecol. Econ. 69 2010 1510 1523
25. Provincie Noord-Brabant Reconstructieplan/Milieueffectrapport De Peel.'s Hertogenbosch 2005
26. StraMis, 2009. Environmental Registration Database. Roxit B.V.; Zwolle, The Netherlands.
27. R.U. Syrbe, O. Bastian, M. Roder, and P. James A framework for monitoring landscape functions: The Saxon Academy Landscape Monitoring Approach (SALMA), exemplified by soil investigations in the Kleine Spree Floodplain (Saxony, Germany) Landsc. Urban Plann. 79 2007 190 199
28. J.W. Termorshuizen, and P.F.M. Opdam Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development Landsc. Ecol. 24 2009 1037 1052
29. TOP10-SE, 2006. Topographic Map Spatial Edition, scale 1:10,000 (Top10 vector). Topografische Dienst Kadaster, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
30. D.B. van Berkel, and P.H. Verburg Sensitising rural policy: assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe Land Use Policy 28 2011 447 459
31. P. Verburg, P. Schot, M. Dijst, and A. Veldkamp Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities GeoJournal 61 2004 309 324
32. P.H. Verburg, J. van de Steeg, A. Veldkamp, and L. Willemen From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization J. Environ. Manage. 90 2009 1327 1335
33. G. Weitkamp, A. Bregt, and R. Van Lammeren Measuring visible space to assess landscape openness Landsc. Res. 36 2011 127 150
34. L. Willemen, L. Hein, M.E.F. van Mensvoort, and P.H. Verburg Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region Ecol. Indic. 10 2010 62 73
35. L. Willemen, P.H. Verburg, L. Hein, and M.E.F. Mensvoort Spatial characterization of landscape functions Landsc. Urban Plann. 88 2008 34 43
36. G.A. Wilson From 'weak' to 'strong' multifunctionality: conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways J. Rural Stud. 24 2008 367 383