GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 385-399

  Kienast, Felix ^a   Degenhardt, Barbara ^a,d   Weilenmann, Barbara ^b   Wäger, Yvonne ^c   Buchecker, Matthias ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^b City of Winterthur ^*  (Switzerland)

^c Winterthur City Library   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Age; GLM; Green space; Health; Landscape preference; Outdoor recreation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; HEALTH;

GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL; GREEN SPACES; LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTIC; LANDSCAPE PREFERENCES; LANDSCAPE PROPERTIES; OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES; OUTDOOR RECREATION; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT;

LOCATION;

DATA SET; GIS; GREENSPACE; HUMAN SETTLEMENT; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; MAPPING; MODEL TEST; NUMERICAL MODEL; OUTDOOR RECREATION; PEDESTRIAN; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; ROAD TRANSPORT; TRANSPORT VEHICLE; WALKING; YOUNG POPULATION;

SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84858290689     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adriaensen F., Chardon J.P., De Blust G., Swinnen E., Villalba S., Gulinck H., et al. The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 64:233-247.
2. Alessa L.N., Kliskey A.A., Brown G. Socio-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:27-39.
3. Appleton J. The experience of landscape 1975, Wiley, New York. 2nd revised ed.
4. Bestard A.B., Font A.R. Environmental diversity in recreational choice modelling. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2743-2750.
5. Bolitzer B., Netusil N.R. The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. J. Environ. Manage. 2000, 59:185-193.
6. Brown G., Raymond C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography 2007, 27:89-111.
7. Buchecker M. Withdrawal from the local public place: Understanding the process of spatial alienation. Landscape Research 2009, 34:279-297.
8. Bunce R.G.H., Metzger M.J., Jongman R.H.G., Brandt J., De Blust G., Elena-Rossello R., et al. A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring, European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23:11-25.
9. Caspersen O.H., Olafsson A.S. Recreational mapping and planning for enlargement of green structure in greater Copenhagen. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2010, 9:101-112.
10. Choumert J., Salanie J. Provision of urban green spaces: Some insights from economics. Landscape Research 2008, 33:331-345.
11. Colson V., Garcia S., Rondeux J., Lejeune P. Map and determinants of woodlands visiting in Wallonia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2010, 9:83-91.
12. Degenhardt B., Frick J., Buchecker M., Guscher H. Influences of personal, social, and environmental factors on workday use frequency of the nearby outdoor recreation areas by working people. Leisure Sciences 2011, 33:420-440.
13. Degenhardt B., Kienast F., Buchecker M. Einflussfaktoren des Naherholungsverhaltens im periurbanen Raum. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 2010, 161:75-80. (in German).
14. DeVries S., Goossen M. Modelling recreational visits to forests and nature areas. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2002, 1:5-14.
15. DeVries S., Lankhorst J.R., Buis A.E. Mapping the attractiveness of the Dutch countryside: A GIS-based landscape appreciation model. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 2007, 81:43-58.
16. Dramstad W.E., Fry G., Fjellstad W.J., Skar B., Helliksen W., Sollund M.-L.B., et al. Integrating landscape-based values - Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 57:257-268.
17. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., Richardson D.M., Le Maitre D.C., van Jaarsveld A.S. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2008, 127:135-140.
18. European Environmental Agency (EEA), 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge. Report N 10/2006 (56 pp). EEA, Copenhagen.
19. Fry G., Tveit M.S., Ode A., Velarde M.D. The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators 2009, 9:933-947.
20. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression 2000, Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
21. Hunziker M., Buchecker M., Hartig T. Space and place - Two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. A changing world - Challenges for landscape research. Springer Landscape Series 8 2007, 47-62. Springer, Berlin, New York. F. Kienast, S. Ghosh, O. Wildi (Eds.).
22. Hunziker M., Felber P., Gehring K., Buchecker M., Bauer N., Kienast F. Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups. Results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mountain Research and Development 2008, 28:140-147.
23. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The experience of nature. A psychological perspective 1989, Cambridge University Press.
24. Kianicka S., Knab L., Buchecker M. Maiensäss - Swiss Alpine summer farms - An element of cultural heritage between conservation and further development: A qualitative study. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2010, 16:486-507.
25. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., deGroot, Verburg P.H., Heller I., et al. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environmental Management 2009, 44:1099-1112.
26. Kliskey A.D. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: A spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 52:33-43.
27. Korpela K., Kinnunen U. How is leisure time interacting with nature related to the need for recovery from work demands? Testing multiple mediators. Leisure Sciences 2011, 33(1):1-14.
28. Korpela K.M., Ylen M., Tyrväinen L., Silvennoinen H. Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promotion International 2010, 25:200-209.
29. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment, business and industry. Synthesis report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
30. Marcouyeux A., Fleury-Bahi G. Place-identity in a school setting: Effects of the place image. Environment and Behavavior 2011, 43(3):344-362.
31. Matsuoka R.H., Kaplan R. People needs in the urban landscape. Analysis of Landscape And Urban Planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 84:7-19.
32. Menard S.W. Applied logistic regression analysis 2002, Sage.
33. Ode A., Fry G. A model for quantifying and predicting urban pressure on woodland. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77:17-27.
34. Ode A., Hagerhall C.M., Sang N. Analysing visual landscape complexity. Theory and Application. Landscape Research 2010, 35:111-131.
35. Ode A., Miller D. Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2011, 38:24-40.
36. Ode A., Tveit M.S., Fry G. Advantages of using different data sources in assessment of landscape change and its effect on visual scale. Ecological Indicators 2010, 10:24-31.
37. Orians G.H. An ecological evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. Landscape meanings and values 1986, Allen and Unwin, London. E.C. Penning-Rowsell, D. Lowenthal (Eds.).
38. Termorshuizen J.W., Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 2009, 24:1037-1052.
39. Tveit M.S. Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:2882-2888.
40. Tyrväinen L., Buchecker M., Degenhardt B., Vuleti D. Evaluating the economic and social benefits of forest recreation and nature tourism. European forest recreation and tourism 2008, 35-63. Taylor & Francis, London and New York. S. Bell, M. Simpson, L. Tyrväinen, T. Sievanen, U. Pröbstl (Eds.).
41. Virden R.J., Walker G.J. Ethnic/racial and gender variations among meanings given to, and preferences for, the natural environment. Leisure Sciences 1999, 21:219-239.
42. Voltz M., Webster R. A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information. European Journal of Soil Science 1990, 41:473-490.
43. Walsh, C., MacNally, R. (2008). hier.part: Hierarchical Partitioning. R package version 1.0-3.
44. Walther P. Vergleichende Studien zur Konstruktion von Bildern über Umweltwandel in Wissenschaft und Alltag. Landschaft+Stadt 1988, 20:1-9. (in German).
45. Weisberg S. Applied linear regression 1980, Wiley.
46. Willemen L., Verburg P.H., Hein L., van Mensvoort M.E.F. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 88:34-43.
47. Zhu X., Pfueller S., Whitelaw P., Winter C. Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River Region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management 2010, 45:896-911.