Early reprogramming regulators identified by prospective isolation and mass cytometry

Nature

Volumn 521, Issue 7552, 2015, Pages 352-356

  Lujan, Ernesto ^a,b   Zunder, Eli R ^a   Ng, Yi Han ^a,b   Goronzy, Isabel N ^a   Nolan, Garry P ^a   Wernig, Marius ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5' NUCLEOTIDASE; ALPHA4 INTEGRIN; CD200 ANTIGEN; EPITHELIAL CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; ETV5 PROTEIN; NR0B1 PROTEIN; REGULATOR PROTEIN; REX PROTEIN; REX1 PROTEIN; STAGE SPECIFIC EMBRYO ANTIGEN 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR DPPA2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ANTIGENS, CD200; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CD15 ANTIGEN; CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DPPA2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; ETV5 PROTEIN, MOUSE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN; NANOG PROTEIN, MOUSE; NR0B1 PROTEIN, MOUSE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; NUCLEAR RECEPTOR DAX 1; SOX2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX; TUMOR ANTIGEN; TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN GA733;

BIOMARKER; CYTOLOGY; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIUM; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; CELL ISOLATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOMETRY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE SILENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MASS CYSTOMETRY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INDUCTION; RECEPTOR UPREGULATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ANIMAL; CELL SEPARATION; CYTOLOGY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME FACTOR;

IPS;

5'-NUCLEOTIDASE; ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD; ANTIGENS, CD15; ANTIGENS, NEOPLASM; BIOMARKERS; CELL ADHESION MOLECULES; CELL SEPARATION; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; DAX-1 ORPHAN NUCLEAR RECEPTOR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; INTEGRIN ALPHA4; MICE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; SOXB1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84930224978     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature14274     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brambrink, T. et al. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2, 151-159 (2008).
2. Buganim, Y. et al. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell 150, 1209-1222 (2012).
3. Golipour, A. et al. A late transition in somati c cell reprogramming requires regulators distinct from the pluripotency network. Cell Stem Cell 11, 769-782 (2012).
4. Chen, J. et al. H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogrammi ng into iPSCs. Nature Genet. 45, 34-42 (2013).
5. Hanna, J. et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462, 595-601 (2009).
6. Ho, R., Papp, B., Hoffman, J. A., Merrill, B. J. & Plath, K. Stage-specific regulation of reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells by Wnt signaling and T cell factor proteins. Cell Rep. 3, 2113-2126 (2013).
7. O'Malley, J. et al. High-resolution analysiswithnovel cell-surface markers identifies routes to iPS cells. Nature 499, 88-91 (2013).
8. P olo, J. M. et al. A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 151, 1617-1632 (2012).
9. Sridharan, R. et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the in duction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364-377 (2009).
10. Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D. T. & Hochedlinger, K. Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogrammi ng inmouse. Cell StemCell 2, 230-240 (2008).
11. Tanabe, K.,Nakamura, M.,Narita, M., Takahashi, K.&Yamanaka, S. Maturation, not initiation, is themajor roadblock during reprogramming towardpluripoten cy from human fibroblasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12172-12179 (2013).
12. Rais, Y. et al. Deterministic direct reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Nature 502, 65-70 (2013).
13. Di Stefano, B. et al. C/EBPa poises B cells for rapid reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 506, 235-239 (2014).
14. Hou, P. et al. Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds. Science 341, 651-654 (2013).
15. Zunder, E. R., Lujan, E.,Goltsev, Y.,Wernig, M.& Nolan,G.P.A continuousmolecular roadmapto iPSC reprogramming through progression analysis of single cellmass cytometry. Cell Stem Cell 16, 323-337 (2015).
16. Ichida, J. K. et al. A small-mole cule inhibitor of Tgf-b signaling replaces Sox2 in reprogramming by inducing Nanog. Cell Stem Cell 5, 491-503 (2009).
17. Li, R. et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required fo r the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 7, 51-63 (2010).
18. Maherali, N. & Hochedlinger, K. Tgfb signal inhibition cooperates in the induction of iPSCs and replaces S ox2 and cMyc. Curr. Biol. 19, 1718-1723 (2009).
19. Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49-55 (2008).
20. Samavarchi-Tehrani P. et al.Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. 7.64-77. 2010
21. Meissner A. Wernig M. Jaenisch R. Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 25 1177-1181. 2007
22. Bandura, D. R. et al. Mass cytometry: Technique for real time single cellmultitarget immunoassay based on inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 81, 6813-6822 (2009).
23. Qiu, P. et a l. Extracting a cellular hierarchy from high-dimensional cytometry data with SPADE. Nature Biotechnol. 29, 886-891 (2011).
24. Zhang, J. et al. Dax1 and Nanog act in parallel to stabilize mou se embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotency. Nature Commun. 5, 5042 (2014).
25. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotency in humansomatic cells via a transient state resembling primitive strea k-like mesendoderm. Nature Commun. 5, 3678 (2014).
26. Vierbuchen, T. et al. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 463, 1035-1041 (2010).
27. Ellis, P. et al. SOX2, a persistent marker for multipotential neural stem cells derived from embryonic stem cells, the embryo or the adult. Dev. Neurosci. 26, 148-165 (2004).
28. Rubinson, D. A. et al. A lentivirus-based system to functionally silence genes in primary mammalian cells, stemcells and transgenic mice by RNA interference. Nature Genet. 33, 401-406 (2003).
29. Fienberg H. G. Simonds E. F. Fantl W. J. Nolan G. P. Bodenmiller B. A platinum-based covalent viability reagent for single-cell mass cytometry. Cytometry 81 467-475 2012
30. Finck, R. et al. Normalization of mass cytometry data with bead standards. Cytometry 83, 483-494 (2013).
31. Linderman, M. D. et al. CytoSPADE: High-performance analy sis and visualization of high-dimensional cytometry data. Bioinformatics28, 2400-2401 (2012).