Reducing the radiation dose for computed tomography colonography using model-based iterative reconstruction

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1183-1189

  Millerd, Patrick J ^a   Paden, Robert G ^a   Lund, Jeffrey T ^a   Hara, Amy K ^a   Stiles, Wendy L ^a   He, Miao ^b   Wu, Qing ^a   Daniel Johnson, C ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction; Computed tomography; CT colonography; Iterative reconstruction; Model based iterative reconstruction; Reduced dose

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; MODEL BASED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; COLON TUMOR; IMAGE PROCESSING; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE;

EID: 84930179404     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: 14320509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0271-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R (2011) Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 259(2):393–405
2. Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 301(23):2453–2461
3. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58(3):130–160
4. Friedel DM, Iqbal S, Stavropoulos SN, et al. (2012) Evolving role of computed tomographic colonography in colon cancer screening and diagnosis. South Med J. 105(10):551–557
5. Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A, et al. (2012) Screening computed tomography colonography with 256-slice scanning: should patient radiation burden and associated cancer risk constitute a major concern? Invest Radiol. 47(8):451–456
6. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA (2005) Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129(1):328–337
7. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Knudsen AB, et al. (2011) Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):816–823
8. Verdun FR, Bochud F, Gundinchet F, et al. (2008) Quality initiatives radiation risk: what you should know to tell your patient. Radiographics 28(7):1807–1816
9. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. (1997) Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(5):1181–1184
10. van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al. (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224(1):25–33
11. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):126–131
12. Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34(11):4526–4544
13. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 359(12):1207–1217 (Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2853)
14. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 194(4):881–889 (Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(5):1404)
15. Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. (2012) Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199(6):1266–1274
16. Yoon MA, Kim SH, Lee JM, et al. (2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 36(5):596–601
17. Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, et al. (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 48(4):206–212
18. Chang KJ, Caovan DB, Grand DJ, Huda W, Mayo-Smith WW (2013) Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography: decreasing tube voltage to 100 kVp. Radiology. 266(3):791–800 (Epub 2012 Dec 21)