Evolving role of computed tomographic colonography in colon cancer screening and diagnosis

Southern Medical Journal

Volumn 105, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 551-557

  Friedel, David M ^a   Iqbal, Shahzad ^a   Stavropoulos, Stavros N ^a   Babich, Jay P ^a   Georgiou, Nicholas ^a   Katz, Douglas S ^a  

^a WINTHROP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon cancer screening; Colonoscopy; Colonpolyps; Computed tomographic colonography

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT;

BARIUM ENEMA; CANCER SCREENING; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; VALIDATION STUDY;

COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84867285062     PISSN: 00384348     EISSN: 15418243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318268c602     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. National Cancer Institute. Colon and rectal cancer. http://www.cancer. gov/ cancertopics/types/colon-and-rectal. Accessed January 30, 2012.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Colorectal cancer trends. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/Colorectal/statistics/trends.htm. Accessed January 30, 2011.
3. Lieberman D. Colon cancer screening and surveillance controversies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2009;25:422-427.
4. Vining DJ, Gelfand DW. Non-invasive colonoscopy using helical CT scanning, 3D reconstruction and virtual reality. Paper presented at: 23rd Meeting and Postgraduate Course of the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists; Maui, Hawaii, 1994.
5. Vining DJ. Virtual colonoscopy: is it reality? Radiology 1996;200:30-31.
6. Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, et al. Validation ofvirtual colonoscopy in the detection of colon polyps and masses: rationale for proper study design. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2001;30:133-140. (Pubitemid 36306728)
7. Zhu H, Fan Y, Liang Z. Improved curvature estimation for computer-aided detection of colon polyps in CT colonography. Acad Radiol 2011;18: 1024-1034.
8. Faciolli N, Foti G, Barillari M, et al. A simplified approach to virtual colonoscopy using different intestinal preparations: preliminary experience in regard to quality, accuracy and patient acceptability. Radiol Med 2011;116:749-758.
9. Taylor SA, Slater A, Burling DN, et al. CT colonography: optimization, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced laxative regimens using barium- based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 2008;18:32-42.
10. Levin B, Lieberman DA, Mc Farland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer JClin 2008;58:130-160. (Pubitemid 351830299)
11. Johnson CD, Mac Carty RL, Welch TJ, et al. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:314-321. (Pubitemid 38447196)
12. Von Wagner C, Smith S, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomized trial of symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2046-2055.
13. Neri E, Faggioni L, Cerri F, et al. CT colonography versus double contrast barium enema for screening ofcolorectal cancer: comparison of radiation burden. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:596-601.
14. Poullos PD, Beaulieu CF. Current techniques in the performance, interpretation, and reporting of CT colonography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin NAm 2010;20:169-192.
15. Sabanli M, Balasingam A, Bailey W, et al. Computed tomographic colonography in the diagnosis ofcolorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010;97: 1291-1294.
16. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. NEngl JMed2003;349:2191-2200. (Pubitemid 37485135)
17. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy forthe detection of advancedneoplasia. NEngl JMed2007;357:1403-1412. (Pubitemid 47535594)
18. Sosna J, Sella T, Bar-Ziv J, et al. Perforation of the colon and rectum-a newly recognized complication of CT colonography. Sem Ultrasound CT MR 2006;27:161-165.
19. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection oflarge adenomas and polyps. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1207-1217.
20. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests for the detection ofadvance adenomas in an average risk population. Gut 2009;58:241-248.
21. Winawer SJ. The multi disciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer: colorectal screening. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol2007;21:1031-1048.
22. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the US Preventive Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:638-658.
23. White TJ, Avery GR, Kennan N, et al. Virtual colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer-prospectivetrial of 150 patients. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:138-145.
24. Sali L, Falchini M, Della Monica P, et al. CT colonography before colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult test. Preliminary experience. Radiol Med2010;115:1267-1278.
25. Kawamura YJ, Okada S, Sasaki J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography and optical colonoscopy evaluated using surgically resected specimens. Abdom Imaging2010;35:584-588.
26. O'Brien MJ, Winawer MJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high grade-dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1990;98:371-379. (Pubitemid 20037919)
27. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:865-869.
28. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Colorectal cancer: managing diminutive polyps-what is the optimal approach? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;8:129-131.
29. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. Working group ofvirtual colonoscopy Radiology 2005;236:3-9.
30. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008;299:1027-1035. (Pubitemid 351347059)
31. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Robbins JB. Flat (nonpolypoid) colorectal lesions identified at CT colonography in a US screening population. Acad Radiol 2010;17:784-790.
32. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seller CM, et al. Protection from colorectal cancer: a population-based, case control study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154:22-30.
33. Lim EJ, Leung C, Pitman A, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal cancer screening in patients with Lynch syndrome gene mutation. Fam Cancer 2010;9:555-561.
34. Keeling AN, Slattery MM, Leong S, et al. Limited-preparation CT colonography in frail elderly patients: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1279-1287.
35. Dhruva S, Phurrough SE, Salive ME, et al. CMS landmarkdecision on CT colonography-examining the relevant data. NEngl JMed 2009;360: 2699-2670.
36. Kinner S,Antoch G, Bockisch A, et al. Whole body PET CT/colonography: a possible new concept for colorectal cancer staging. Abdom Imaging 2007;32:606-612. (Pubitemid 47594245)
37. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. Reducing the radiation exposure for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:126-131.
38. Macari M, Nevsky G, Bonavita J, et al. CT colonography in senior versus nonsenior patients: extracolonic findings, recommendations for additional imaging and polyp prevalence. Radiology 2011;259:767-774.
39. Vanness DJ, Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Volelaar I, et al. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations. Radiology 2011;261:487-498.
40. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, et al. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost effective analysis. AJR Am JRoentgenol 2009;192:1332-1340.
41. Young PE, Ray OP, Hwang I, et al. Gastroenterologists' interpretation of CTC: a pilot study demonstrating feasibility and similar accuracy compared with radiologists' interpretation. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104: 2925-2931.
42. The Lewin Group/Olympus America. The impact of improved colorectal cancer screening rates on adequacy of future supply ofgastroenterologists. http://www.crcawareness.com/files/Lewin-Gastroenterologist-Report.pdf. Published January 7, 2009. Accessed January 30, 2012.
43. Friedman AC, Downing D, Chino J, et al. Feasibility of remote CT colonography at two rural Native American medical centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1110-1117.
44. Cash BD. Establishing a CT colonography service. Gastrointest Endosc Clin NAm 2010;20:379-399.
45. Mc Hugh M, Osei-Anto A, Klabunde CN, et al. Adoption of CT colonography by U.S. hospitals. JAm Coll Radiol 2011;8:169-174.