Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders' profiles

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 13, Issue , 2015, Pages 141-152

  García Nieto, Ana P ^a,b   Quintas Soriano, Cristina ^a,c   García Llorente, Marina ^a,d   Palomo, Ignacio ^a,e   Montes, Carlos ^a   Martín López, Berta ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b AVIGNON UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^e BASQUE CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE BC3   (Spain)

Author keywords

Deliberative workshop; Protected area; Public participatory geographic information system techniques; Rural areas; Service benefiting area; Service providing unit

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930177853     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Araque E., Cantarero Quesada J.M., Garrido Almonacid M., Moya García E., Sánchez Martínez J.D. Sierra Morena una lectura geográfica para un destino turístico en ciernes. Cuad. Tur. 2005, 16:1139-7861.
2. Bai Y., Zhuang C., Ouyang S., Zheng H., Jiang B. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecol. Complex. 2011, 8:177-183.
3. Bartlett M.S. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br. J. Stat. Psychol. 1950, 3:77-85.
4. Berkes F. Religious traditions and biodiversity. Encycl. Biodivers. 2001, 5:109-120.
5. Brown G., Reed P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 2000, 46(2):240-247.
6. Brown G., Raymond C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geogr. 2007, 27(2):89-111.
7. Brown G. An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 34:289-294.
8. Brown G. Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA J. 2012, 25(2):5-16.
9. Brown G., Montag J.M., Lyon K. Method for identifying Ecosystem Services. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2012, 25(7):633-651.
10. Brown G., Weber D. Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Appl. Geogr. 2012, 34:316-324.
11. Brown G., Kelly M., Whitall D. Which "public"? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) systems for public lands management. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2013, 57(2):190-214.
12. Brown G., Kyttä M. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 46(0):122-136.
13. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., Macdonald D.H. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what, and how?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97:111-122.
14. Castro A., García-Llorente M., Martín-López B., Palomo I., Iniesta-Arandia I. Multidimensional approaches in ecosystem services assessment. Earth Obs. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 20:427-454.
15. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18.
16. Community Participation and GIS 2002, Taylor and Francis, London. W. Craig, T. Harris, D. Weiner (Eds.).
17. Daniel T.C., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.A., Costanza R., Thomas Elmqvist T., Flint C.G., Gobster P.H., Grêt-Regamey A, Lave R., Muhar S., Penker M., Ribe R.G., Schauppenlehner T., Sikor T., Soloviy I., Spierenburg M., Taczanowska K., Tam J., von der Dunk A. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. PNAS 2012, 109(23):8812-8819.
18. De Groot R. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:393-408.
19. Dudley N., Higgins-Zogib L., Hockings M., MacKinnon K., Trevor-Sandwith T., Stolton S. National parks with benefits: how protecting the planet's biodiversity also provides ecosystem services. Solut. J. 2011, 6:87-95.
20. Fagerholm N., Käyhkö N., Ndumbaro F., Khamis M. Community stakeholders' knowledge in landscape assessments - mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 18:421-433.
21. García-Llorente M., Martín-López B., Montes C. A choice experiment study for land-use scenarios in semi-arid watershed environments. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 87:219-230.
22. García-Llorente M., Martín-López B., Iniesta-Arandia I., López-Santiago C.A., Aguilera P.A., Montes C. The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 19(20):136-146.
23. García-Nieto A.P., García-Llorente M., Iniesta-Arandia I., Martín-López M. Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:126-138.
24. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis 2010, 110-139. Cambridge University Press, British Ecological Society. D. Raffaelli, C. Frid (Eds.).
25. Harrington R., Curtis A., Black R. Locating communities in natural resource management. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2008, 10(2):199-215.
26. Harrington R., Anton C., Dawson T.P., De Bello F., Feld C.K., Haslett J.R., Kluvánkova-Oravská T., Kontogianni A., Lavorel S., Luck G.W., Rounsevell M.D.A, Samways M.J., Settele J., Skourtos M., Spangenberg J.A., Vandewalle M., Zobel M., Harrison P.A. Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2773-2790.
27. Hasse J.E., Lathrop R.G. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Appl. Geogr. 2003, 23:159-175.
28. Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Aguilera P.A., Montes C., Martín-López B. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change and human well-being. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 108:36-48.
29. Klain S.C., Chan K.M.A. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 82:104-113.
30. Kumar M., Kumar P. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psychocultural perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64:808-819.
31. Lamarque P., Tappeiner U., Turner C., Steinbacher M., Bardgett R.D., Szukicks U., Schermer M., Lavorel S. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2011, 11:791-804.
32. Lamarque P., Quétier F., Lavorel S. The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. C. R. Biol. 2011, 334:441-449.
33. Luck G.W., Harrington R., Harrison P.A., Kremen C., Berry P.M., Bugter R., Dawson T.P., De Bello F., Diaz S., Feld C.K., Haslett J.R., Hering D., Kontogianni A., Lavorel S., Rounsevell M., Samways M.J., Sandin L., Settele J., Sykes M.T., Van Den Hove S., Vandewalle M., Zobel M. Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 2009, 59:223-235.
34. Maguire B., Potts J., Fletcher S. The role of stakeholders in the marine planning process-stakeholder analysis within the Solent, United Kingdom. Mar. Policy 2012, 36:246-257.
35. Martín-López B., Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Palomo I., Casado-Arzuaga I., García Del Amo D., Gómez-Baggethun E., Oteros-Rozas E., Palacios-Agundez I., Willaarts B., González J.A., Santos-Martín F., Onaindia M., López-Santiago C., Montes C. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. Plos ONE 2012, 7:e38970.
36. (MA) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Isl. Press, Washington, DC.
37. Moran P.A. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 1950, 37:17-33.
38. Moreira, J.M., Rodriguez, M., Móniz, C., Ojeda, J.F., Rodriguez, J., Venegas, C., Zoido, F., 2005. Mapa de paisajes de Andalucía. Incluido en el Tomo II del Atlas de Andalucía. Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes - Consejería de Medio Ambiente. Sevilla.
39. Mouchet M.A., Lamarque P., Martín-López B., Crouzat E., Gos P., Byczek C., Lavorel S. An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 8:298-308.
40. Nieto-Romero M., Oteros-Rozas E., González J.A., Martín-López B. Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: insights for future research. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 37:121-133.
41. Oteros-Rozas E., Martín-López B., López C.A., Palomo I., González J.A. Envisioning the future of transhumant pastoralism through participatory scenario planning: a case study in Spain. Rangel. J. 2013, 35:251-272.
42. Oteros-Rozas E., Martín-López B., González J.A., Plieninger T., López C.A., Montes C. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014, 14(4):1269-1289.
43. Pahl-Wostl C. Participative and stakeholder based policy design, evaluation and modelling processes. Integr. Assess. 2002, 3:3-14.
44. Pahl-Wostl C., Craps M., Dewulf A., Mostert E., Tabara D., Taillieu T. Social learning and water resources management. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12(2):5.
45. Palomo I., Martín-López B., López C.A., Montes C. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain. Ecol. Soc. 2011, 16(1):23.
46. Palomo I., Martín-López B., Potschin M., Haines-Young R., Montes C. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecos. Serv. 2013, 4:104-116.
47. Palomo I., Martín-López B., Zorrilla-Miras P., García del Amo D., Montes C. Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014, 14:237-251.
48. Pilgrim S., Smith D.J., Pretty J. A cross-regional assessment of the factors affecting ecoliteracy: implications for policy and practice. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17:1742-1751.
49. Pilgrim S., Cullen L., Smith D.J., Pretty J. Ecological knowledge is lost in wealthier communities and countries. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:1004-1009.
50. Plieninger T., Dijks S., Oteros-Rozas E., Bieling C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:118-129.
51. Pomeroy R., Douvere F. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:816-822.
52. (PORN) Plan de Ordenación de los Recursos Naturales y el Plan Rector de Uso y Gestión del Parque Natural Sierra Nevada 1994. Decree 64, 15 March 1994. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/boja/1994/53/3.
53. Pretty J. Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems. Environ. Conserv. 2011, 38:127-139.
54. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:5242-5247.
55. Raymond C.M., Brown G. A method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2006, 49(6):797-812.
56. Raymond C.M., Bryan B.A., MacDonald D.H., Cast A., Strathearn S., Grandgirard A., Kalivas T. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:1301-1315.
57. Raymond C.M., Singh G.G., Benessaiah K., Bernhardt J.R., Levine J., Nelson H., Turner N.J., Norton B., Tam J., Chan K.M.A. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience 2013, 63(7):536-546.
58. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:1933-1949.
59. Rodríguez J.P., Beard T.D., Bennett E.M., Cumming G.S., Cork S.J., Agard J., Dobson A.P., Peterson G.D. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11(1):28.
60. Ryan R.L. The social landscape of planning: integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 100:361-363.
61. Sánchez-Picón A., Aznar-Sánchez J.A., García-Latorre J. Economic cycles and environmental crisis in arid southeastern Spain. A historical perspective. J. Arid Environ. 2011, 75:1360-1367.
62. Santos-Martín F., Martín-López B., García-Llorente M., Aguado M., Benayas J., Montes C. Unraveling the relationships between ecosystems and human wellbeing in Spain. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(9):e73249. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073249.
63. Schneiders A., Van Daele T., Van Landuyt W., Van Reeth W. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: complementary approaches for ecosystem management?. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:123-133.
64. Stewart E.J., Jacobson D., Draper D. Public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS): challenges of implementation in Churchill, Manitoba. Can. Geogr./Le Géographe canadien 2008, 52:351-366.
65. Swetnam R.D., Fisher B., Mbilinyi B.P., Munishi P.K.T., Willcock S., Ricketts T., Mwakalila S., et al. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92(3):563-574.
66. Syrbe R.U., Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:80-88.
67. Tëngo M., Brondizio E.S., Elmqvist T., Malmer P., Spierenburg M. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. AMBIO 2014, 43:579-591.
68. Van Riper C.J., Kyle G.T., Sutton S.G., Barnes M., Sherrouse B.C. Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 35:164-173.
69. Willemen L., Hein L., van Mensvoort M.E.F., Verburg P.H. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10:62-73.
70. Young J.C., Jordan A., Searle K.R., Butler A., Chapman D.S., Simmons P., Watt A.D. Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation?. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 158:359-370.