Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: The Doñana social-ecological system in Southwestern Spain

Ecology and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Palomo, Ignacio ^a   Martín López, Berta ^a,b   López Santiago, Cesar ^a   Montes, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Backcasting; Do ana social ecological system; Ecosystem services; Multi scale scenarios; Participatory scenario planning; Protected areas management; Social ecological system; Spain

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; PROTECTED AREA;

ANDALUCIA; DONANA; SPAIN;

EID: 79954470573     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-03862-160123     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Aguilar Fernández, S. 2008. The legitimacy problems in Spanish nature policy: The case of Doñana. Pages 83-100 in J. Keulartz and G. Leistra, editors. Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: case studies in multilevel governance. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
2. Anderies, J. M., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of socialecological systems from an institutional perspective. Conservation Ecology 9(1):18. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18.
3. Andersen, I. E., and B. Jaeger. 1999. Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy 26(5):331-340.
4. Atienza-Serna, L. 2001. Desarrollo sostenible y medio ambiente. Pages 157-166 in C. Roman del Río, editor. Aprendiendo a Innovar: Regiones del conocimiento. Instituto de desarrollo regional, Fundación Interuniversitaria.
5. Atienza-Serna, L., M. González Ruiz, and A. Villa Díaz. 2003. Bases estratégicas para una agricultura sostenible en Doñana. De la agricultura al desarrollo rural sostenible. Fundación Doñana 21, Huelva, Spain.
6. Baker, J. P., D. W. Hulse, S. V. Gregory, D. White, J. Van Sickle, P. A. Berger, D. Dole, and N. H. Schumaker. 2004. Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Ecological Applications 14(2):313-324.
7. Bengtsson, J., P. Angelstam, T. Elmqvist, U. Emanuelsson, C. Folke, M. Ihse, F. Moberg, and M. Nyström. 2003. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32(6):389-396.
8. Bennett, E.M., G. D. Peterson, and L. J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12:1394-1404.
9. Bennett, G., editor. 1994. Conserving Europe's natural heritage: towards a European ecological network. In Conserving Europe's natural heritage: towards a European ecological network; proceedings of the international conference held in Maastricht, 9-12 November 1993. Graham & Trotman:Martinus Nijhoff, London, UK.
10. Berkes, F., and I. J. Davidson-Hunt. 2006. Biodiversity, traditional management systems, and cultural landscapes: examples from the boreal forest of Canada. International Social Science Journal 187:35-47.
11. Berkes, F., and C. Folke. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Biggs, R., C. Raudsepp-Hearne, C. Atkinson-Palombo, E. Bohensky, E. Boyd, G. Cundill, H. Fox, S. Ingram, K. Kok, S. Spehat, M. Tengö, D. Timmer, and M. Zurek. 2007. Linking futures across scales: a dialogue on multiscale scenarios. Ecology & Society 12(1): 17. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art17/.
13. Bohensky, E. L., B. Reyers, and A. S. Van Jaarsveld. 2006. Future ecosystem services in a Southern African river basin: a scenario planning approach to uncertainty. Conservation Biology 20(4):1051-1061.
14. Brown K., W. N. Adger, E. Tomkins, P. Bacon, D. Shim, and K. Young. 2001. Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecological Economics 37:417-434.
15. Butler, C. D., R. Chambers, K. Chopra, P. Dasgupta, A. Duraiappah, P. Kumar, A. J. McMichael, and N Wen-Yuan N. 2003. Ecosystems and human wellbeing. Pages 71-84 in Ecosystems and human wellbeing: a framework for assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, and Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
16. Carlson-Kanyama A., K. Henrik Dreborg, H. C. Moll, and D. Padovan. 2008. Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 40:34-46.
17. Carmona, J., and F. Fuentelsaz. 2006. Problemas Ambientales de la Comarca de Doñana. Situación actual y propuestas. World Wildlife Fund, Madrid, Spain.
18. Carpenter, S. R., E. M. Bennett, and G. D. Peterson. 2006. Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecology & Society 11(1): 29. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art29/.
19. Carpenter, S. R., P. L. Pingali, E. Bennett, and M. Zurek, editors. 2005. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, and Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
20. Cork, S., G. Peterson, G. Petschel-Held, J. Alcamo, J. Alder, E. M. Bennett, E. R. Carr, D. Deane, G. C. Nelson, T. Ribeiro, C. Butler, E. M. Mendiondo, W. Olouch-Kosura, and M. Zurek. 2005. Four scenarios. Pages 223-294 in S. R. Carpenter, P. L. Pingali, E. Bennett, and M. Zurek, editors. Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, and Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
21. Corominas, J. 1995. La agricultura en el entorno de Doñana. Revista de Obras Públicas 3340:65-74.
22. Defries, R., A. Hansen, A. C. Newton, and M. C. Hansen. 2005. Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forest over the past twenty years. Ecological Applications 15(1):19-26.
23. de Groot, R. 2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75:175-186.
24. de Groot, R., M. Stuip, M. Finlayson, and N. Davidson. 2006. Valuing wetlands: guidance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services. Ramsar Technical Report No. 3, CBD Technical Series No. 27. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
25. Doctor, A. M. 2009. Rural tourism and urban growth regulations in Doñana National Park: antecedents and current planning. Pages 109-123 in M. J. Prados, editor. Naturbanization: new identities and processes for rural-natural areas. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.
26. Dreborg, K. H. 1996. Essence of backcasting. Futures 28(9):813-828.
27. Elbersen, B. 2001. Nature on the doorstep: the relationship between protected natural areas and residential activity in the European countryside. Alterra, Utrecht/Wageningen, The Netherlands.
28. Elbersen, B., and M. J. Prados. 1999. Desarrollo rural y calidad de vida en el entorno del Parque Nacional de Doñana. Revista de estudios Regionales 55:47-76.
29. Elster, J., editor. 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. Enfors, E. I., L. J. Gordon, G. D. Peterson, and D. Bossio. 2008. Making investments in dryland development work: participatory scenario planning in the Makanya catchment, Tanzania. Ecology & Society 13(2): 42. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art42/.
31. Escalera, J. 2007. Cohesión y participación social en Doñana: Propuestas para el debate, Universidad Pablo de Olavide. Document from the participative process of the II Sustainable Development Plan, Seville, Spain.
32. Fernández, M., and F. Borja-Barrera. 2006. Doñana y cambio climático: Propuestas para la mitigación de los efectos. World Wildlife Fund, Madrid, Spain.
33. Fernández-Delgado, C. 1997. Conservation management of a European natural area: Doñana National Park, Spain. Pages 458-467 in G. K. Meffe and C. R. Carroll, editors. Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
34. Fidalgo, B., and L. M. Pinto. 2005. Linking landscape functions and preferences in forest landscapes - a tool for scenario building and evaluation: a contribution from the VisuLands Project. Pages 34-35 in E. Lange and D. Miller, editors. Proceedings of our shared landscape: integrating ecological socio-economic and aesthetic aspects in landscape planning and management. Ascona, Switzerland.
35. Folke, C. 2006. The economic perspective: conservation against development versus conservation for development. Conservation Biology 20 (3):686-688.
36. Gómez-Baggethun, E. 2010. Ecologizar la economía o economizar la ecología. Controversias teóricas y desafíos prácticos en la valoración de los servicios de los ecosistemas. Thesis. Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
37. Gómez-Baggethun, E., S. Mingorría, V. Reyes-García, L. Calvet, and C. Montes. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the Doñana natural areas. Conservation Biology, in press.
38. González-Arteaga, J. 1993. Las marismas del Guadalquivir: etapas de su aprovechamiento económico. Antonio Cuevas, editor. Seville, Spain.
39. Grimalt, J. O., M. Ferrer, and E. Macpherson. 1999. The mine tailing accident in Aznalcollar. The Science of the Total Environment 242:3-11.
40. Gude, P. H., A. J. Hansen, and D. A. Jones. 2007. Biodiversity consequences of alternative future land use scenarios in Greater Yellowstone. Ecological Applications 17(4):1004-1018.
41. Gunderson, L. H., C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light, editors. 1995. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
42. Hammer, T. 2007. Protected areas and regional development: conflicts and opportunities. Pages 21-36 in I. Mose, editor. Protected areas and regional development in Europe: towards a new model for the 21st century. Ashgate Publishing Company, Hampshire, England.
43. Hansen, A. J., R. De Fries, and W. Turner. 2004. Land use change and biodiversity: a synthesis of rates and consequences during the period of satellite imagery. Pages 277-299 in G. Gutman and C. Justice, editors. Land change science: observing, monitoring, and understanding trajectories of change on the Earth's surface. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
44. Heimlich, R. E., K. D. Wiebe, R. Claassen, D. Gadsby, and R. M. House. 1998. Wetlands and agriculture: private interests and public benefits. Agricultural Economic Report No. 765. Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
45. Holdgate, M. W. 1994. Protected areas in the future: the implications of change, and the need for new policies. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:406-410.
46. Holling, C. S., and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10(2):328-337.
47. Huss, W. R. 1988. A move toward scenario analysis. International Journal of Forecasting 4:377-388.
48. International Union for Conservation of Nature (World Conservation Union). 2004. The Durban Action Plan: Vth IUCN World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
49. Jessel, B., and J. Jacobs. 2005. Land use scenario development and stakeholder involvement as tools for watershed management within the Havel river basin. Limnologica 35:220-233.
50. Jones Walters, L. 2008. Biodiversity in multifunctional landscapes. Journal of Nature Conservation 16:117-119.
51. Kok, K., R. Biggs, and M. Zurek. 2007. Methods for developing multi-scale participatory scenarios: insights from Southern Africa and Europe. Ecology & Society 13(1): 8. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art8/.
52. Kok, K., M. Patel, and D. S. Rothman. 2004. Final report of European and Mediterranean scenarios: upscaling the results from the target area scenarios. MedAction Deliverable 4. International Centre for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development (ICIS) Working Paper I04-E002. Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
53. Kok, K., and D. S. Rothman. 2003. Mediterranean scenarios. MedAction Deliverable 3. First Draft. Report number I03-E001. International Centre for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development (ICIS), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
54. Kok, K., D. S. Rothman, and M. Patel. 2006. Multiscale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 38:261-284.
55. Lanzarot Freudenthal, M. P. 2007. Cianobacterias tóxicas y mortandades en masa de fauna salvaje en las marismas de Doñana. Thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
56. Ludwig, D. 2001. The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4:758-764.
57. Lynam T., W. de Jong, D. Sheil, T. Kusumanto, and K. Evans. 2007. A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology & Society 12(1): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art5/.
58. Martín-López, B., E. Gómez-Baggethun, P. L. Lomas, and C. Montes. 2009b. Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1050-1059.
59. Martín-López, B., C. Montes, and J. Benayas. 2007a. Influence of user characteristics on valuation of ecosystem services in Doñana Natural Protected Areas (south-west Spain). Environmental Conservation 34(3):215-224.
60. Martín-López, B., C. Montes, L. Ramírez and J. Benayas. 2009a. What drives policy decisionmaking related to species conservation? Biological Conservation 142:1370-1380.
61. McNeely, J. A. 1994. Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:390-405.
62. Méndez-Contreras, J., F. Dickinson, and T. Castillo Burguete. 2008. Community member viewpoints on the Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico: suggestions for improving the community/ natural protected area relationship. Human Ecology 36:111-123.
63. Montes, C., F. Borja, M. A. Bravo, and J. M. Moreira. 1998. Reconocimiento Biofísico de Espacios Naturales Protegidos. Doñana: Una Aproximación Ecosistómica. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, España.
64. Nakišenoviš, N., and 26 co-authors. 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
65. Narayan, D., R. Chambers, M. K. Shah, and P. Petesch. 1999. Global synthesis: consultations with the poor. World Bank, Washington, DC.
66. Naughton-Treves, L., M. Buck-Holland, K. Brandon. 2005. The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:219-252.
67. Ojeda-Rivera, J. F. 1986. Protéction ou développment. La creation et l'abuse d'un faux dilemme relative au P.N. Doñana et de sa región. Pages 275-279 in L'Harmattan, editor. Du rural à l'environnement. XII Colloque National de ĺAssociation des Ruralistes Français (A.R.F.), Paris, France.
68. Ojeda-Rivera, J. F. 1987. Organización del territorio en Doñana y su Entorno próximo (Almonte). Siglos XVIII-XX. Instituto para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid, Spain.
69. Ojeda-Rivera, J. F. 1990. Doñana paisaje cultural- Doñana cultural landscape. Pages 18-25 in Doñana: la naturaleza en España, (Edición bilingüe). Lundwerg, Barcelona, Spain.
70. Ojeda-Rivera, J. F. 1999. Espacios naturals protegidos y desarrollo sostenible. Pages 273-286 in Federación de espacios naturales protegidos de Andalucía: Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles. Geografía y espacios naturales protegidos, Sevilla, Spain.
71. Ojeda-Rivera, J. F., and L. Moral Ituarte. 2004. Percepciones del agua y modelos de su gestión en las distintas fases de la configuración de Doñana. Investigaciones Geográficas 35:25-44.
72. Oñate, J. J., D. Pereira, and F. Suárez. 2003. Strategic Environmental Assessment of the effects of European Uniońs Regional Development Plans in Doñana National Park (Spain). Environmental Management 31(5):642-655.
73. Pereira, E., C. Queiroz, H. M. Pereira, and L. Vicente. 2005. Ecosystem services and human wellbeing: a participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology & Society 10(2): 14. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14/.
74. Peterson, G. D., T. D. Beard Jr., B. E. Beisner, E. M. Bennett, S. R. Carpenter, G. S. Cumming, C. L. Dent, and T. D. Havlicek. 2003a. Assessing future ecosystem services: a case study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin. Conservation Ecology 7(3):1. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art1/.
75. Peterson, G. D., G. S. Cumming, and S. R. Carpenter. 2003b. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17(2):358-366.
76. Philips, A. 2002. Management Guidelines for IUCN Category V Protected Areas: Protected Landscapes/ Seascapes. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
77. Phillips, A. 2003. Turning ideas on their head: the new paradigm for protected areas. The George Wright Forum 20(2):8-32.
78. Pimbert, M. P., and J. N. Pretty. 1997. Parks, people and professionals: putting "participation" into protected-area management. Pages 297-332 in K. B. Ghimire and M. P. Pimbert, editors. Social change and conservation: environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. Earthscan, London, UK.
79. Pretty, J. 2003. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:1912-1914.
80. Pretty, J., and 14 co-authors. 2009. The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: towards integration. Conservation and Society 7(2):100-112.
81. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141:2417-2431.
82. Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1933-1949.
83. Ribot, J. C. 2002. Democratic decentralization of natural resources: institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
84. Rist, S., M. Chidambaranathanb, C. Escobarc, U. Wiesmannd, and A. Zimmermanne. 2007. Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies 23(1):23-37.
85. Robinson, J. 2003.Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35:839-856.
86. Rodríguez, J. P., T. D. Beard, Jr., E. M. Bennett, G. S. Cumming, S. Cork, J. Agard, A. P. Dobson, and G. D. Peterson. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology & Society 11(1): 28. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/.
87. Rotmans, J., M. van Asselt, C. Anastasi, S. Greeuw, J. Mellors, S. Peters, D. Rothman, and N. Rijkens. 2000. Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures 32:809-831.
88. Roux, D. J., K. H. Rogers, H. C. Biggs, P. J. Ashton, and A. Sergeant. 2006. Bridging the science- management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology & Society 11(1): 4. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art4/.
89. Ruiz, F., A. Rodríguez-Ramírez, L. M. Cáceres, J. Rodríguez Vidal, M. Isabel Carretero, M. Abad, M. Olías, and M. Pozo. 2005. Evidence of high-energy events in the geological record: Mid-holocene evolution of the southwestern Doñana National Park (SW Spain). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 229:212-229.
90. Sala, O. E., and 18 co-authors. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770-1774.
91. Sandker, M., A. Suwarno, and B. M. Campbell. 2007. Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecology & Society 12(2):37. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art37/.
92. Saunders, D. L., J. J. Meeuwig, and A. C. J. Vincent. 2002. Freshwater protected areas: strategies for conservation. Conservation Biology 16(1):30-41.
93. Scherr, S. J., and J. A. McNeely. 2008. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of "ecoagriculture" landscapes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363:477-494.
94. Sepp, K., H. Palang, U. Mander, and A. Kaasik. 1999. Prospects for nature and landscape protection in Estonia. Landscape and Urban Planning 46:161-167.
95. Stringer, L.C., A. J. Dougill, E. Fraser, K. Hubacek, C. Prell, and M. S. Reed. 2006. Unpacking "participation" in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology & Society 11(2):39. [online] URL: (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art39/).
96. Svancara, L. K, J. M. Scott, T. R. Loveland, and A. B. Pidgorna. 2009. Assessing the landscape context and conversion risk of protected areas using satellite data products. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:1357-1369.
97. Tippett, J., J. F. Handley, and J. Ravetz. 2007. Meeting the challenges of sustainable development -a conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning. Progress in Planning 67:9-98.
98. Tompkins, E. L., R. Few, and K. Brown. 2008. Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. Journal of Environmental Management 88:1580-1592.
99. Van der Zouwen, M. 2006. Dynamics in nature policy practices across the European union. Pages 139-159 in B. Arts and P. Leroy, editors. Dynamics in nature policy practices across the European Union. Springer, Dordrecht, Holland.
100. Warner, M. 1997. "Consensus" participation: An example for protected areas planning. Public Administration and Development 17:413-432.
101. Weber, J. L. et al. 2008. Ecosystem accounting for the cost of biodiversity losses: framework and case study for coastal Mediterranean wetlands, 31 March 2008. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. [online] URL: http://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/understanding-the-full-value-of-biodiversityloss/ecosystem-accounting-for-the-cost-of-biodiversitylosses-framework-and-case-study-for-coastalmediterranean-wetlands-abstract-2013-31-march-2008.
102. West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2006. Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:251-277.
103. Wiens, J. A. 1996. Wildlife in patchy environments: metapopulations, mosaics, and management. Pages 53-84 in D. R. McCollough, editor. Metapopulations and conservation. Island Press, Covelo, California, USA.
104. With, K. A. 2005. Landscape conservation: a new paradigm for the conservation of biodiversity. Pages 238-247 in J. Wiens and M. Moss, editors. Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
105. Wollenberg, E., D. Edmunds, and L. Buck. 2000. Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive comanagement of community forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 47:65-77.
106. Zimmerer, K. S. 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (2):356-369.
107. Zurek, M. B., and T. Henrichs. 2007. Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 74:1282-1295.