Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 22, 2014, Pages E1291-E1296

  Matsuura, Y ^a   Giambini, H ^a   Ogawa, Y ^b   Fang, Z ^a,c   Thoreson, A R ^a   Yaszemski, M J ^a   Lu, L ^a   An, K N ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

augmentation; finite element models; fracture risk; lytic metastases; nonlinear; polymer; specimen specific; spine; vertebral fracture load; vertebroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; COPOLYMER; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); BIOMATERIAL; POLY(PROPYLENE FUMARATE-CO-CAPROLACTONE); POLYESTER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE METASTASIS; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE FRACTURE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT T TEST; VERTEBRA BODY; VERTEBRAL FRACTURE LOAD; VERTEBRAL FRACTURE STIFFNESS; YOUNG MODULUS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BIOMECHANICS; FORECASTING; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SECONDARY; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINAL NEOPLASMS; SPINE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE CEMENTS; CADAVER; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; POLYESTERS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINAL NEOPLASMS; SPINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VERTEBROPLASTY;

EID: 84930083973     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000540     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11-30
2. Wong DA, Fornasier VL, MacNab I. Spinal metastases: the obvious, the occult, and the impostors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990; 15: 1-4
3. Eleraky M, Papanastassiou I, Vrionis FD. Management of metastatic spine disease. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2010; 4: 182-8
4. Whyne CM, Hu SS, Lotz JC. Parametric fi nite element analysis of vertebral bodies affected by tumors. J Biomech 2001; 34: 1317-24
5. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]. Neurochirurgie 1987; 33: 166-8
6. Ahn H, Mousavi P, Roth S, et al. Stability of the metastatic spine pre and post vertebroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 178-82
7. Bhatt AD, Schuler JC, Boakye M, et al. Current and emerging concepts in non-invasive and minimally invasive management of spine metastasis. Cancer Treat Rev 2013; 39: 142-52
8. Trout AT, Kallmes DF. Does vertebroplasty cause incident vertebral fractures? A review of available data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1397-403
9. Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Kaufmann TJ. New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur signifi cantly sooner. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 217-23
10. Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Lane JI, et al. Subsequent vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty: association with intraosseous clefts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1586-91
11. Belkoff SM, Maroney M, Fenton DC, et al. An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Bone 1999; 25: 23S-6S
12. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an infl atable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 151-6
13. Fahim DK, Sun K, Tawackoli W, et al. Premature adjacent vertebral fracture after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study. Neurosurgery 2011; 69: 733-44
14. Furtado N, Oakland RJ, Wilcox RK, et al. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: E480-7
15. Higgins KB, Harten RD, Langrana NA, et al. Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 1540-7; discussion 8
16. Lin SW, Chiang CK, Yang CL, et al. Feasibility study of using viscoplastic bone cement for vertebroplasty: an in vivo clinical trial and in vitro cadaveric biomechanical examination. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E385-91
17. Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. The effect of vertebral body percentage fi ll on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 1549-54
18. Rodrigues DC, Ordway NR, Ma CR, et al. An ex vivo exothermal and mechanical evaluation of two-solution bone cements in vertebroplasty. Spine J 2011; 11: 432-9
19. Steens J, Verdonschot N, Aalsma AM, et al. The infl uence of endplate-to-endplate cement augmentation on vertebral strength and stiffness in vertebroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: E419-22
20. Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. Biomechanical effi cacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 1772-6
21. Bai B, Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, et al. The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24: 1521-6
22. Heini PF, Berlemann U, Kaufmann M, et al. Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones- A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty effi cacy with different bone cements. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 164-71
23. Nouda S, Tomita S, Kin A, et al. Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2613-8
24. Perry A, Mahar A, Massie J, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. Spine J 2005; 5: 489-93
25. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, et al. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with vertebroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1542-6
26. Kim C, Mahar A, Perry A, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20: 604-9
27. Wang S, Lu L, Gruetzmacher JA, et al. Synthesis and characterizations of biodegradable and crosslinkable poly(epsilon-caprolactone fumarate), poly(ethylene glycol fumarate), and their amphiphilic copolymer. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 832-41
28. Yan J, Li J, Runge MB, et al. Cross-linking characteristics and mechanical properties of an injectable biomaterial composed of polypropylene fumarate and polycaprolactone co-polymer. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2011; 22: 489-504
29. Wang S, Kempen DH, Simha NK, et al. Photo-cross-linked hybrid polymer networks consisting of poly(propylene fumarate) and poly(caprolactone fumarate): controlled physical properties and regulated bone and nerve cell responses. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9: 1229-41
30. Matsumoto T, Ohnishi I, Bessho M, et al. Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear fi nite element method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1464-9
31. Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone 2003; 33: 744-50
32. Imai K, Ohnishi I, Bessho M, et al. Nonlinear fi nite element model predicts vertebral bone strength and fracture site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: 1789-94
33. Silva MJ, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC. Computed tomography-based fi nite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections. J Orthop Res 1998; 16: 300-8
34. Zeinali A, Hashemi B, Akhlaghpoor S. Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear fi nite element method and an image based technique. Phys Med 2010; 26: 88-97
35. Liebschner MA, Kopperdahl DL, Rosenberg WS, et al. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 559-65
36. Fang Z, Giambini H, Zeng H, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an Injectable and biodegradable copolymer P(PF-co-CL) in a cadaveric vertebral body defect model. Tissue Eng Part A 2014; 20: 1096-102
37. Keller TS. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech 1994; 27: 1159-68
38. Mirzaei M, Zeinali A, Razmjoo A, et al. On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based fi nite element method. J Biomech 2009; 42: 1584-91
39. Drucker DC, Prager W. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis for limit design. 1952; 10: 157-65
40. Imai K, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, et al. Assessment of vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects of alendronate in postmenopausal women using a quantitative computed tomography-based nonlinear fi nite element method. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20: 801-10
41. Imai K, Ohnishi I, Yamamoto S, et al. In vivo assessment of lumbar vertebral strength in elderly women using computed tomography-based nonlinear fi nite element model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 27-32
42. Overaker DW, Langrana NA, Cuitino AM. Finite element analysis of vertebral body mechanics with a nonlinear microstructural model for the trabecular core. J Biomech Eng 1999; 121: 542-50
43. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, et al. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated fi nite element modeling. J Biomech 1998; 32: 125-33
44. Carter DR, Hayes WC. Bone compressive strength: the infl uence of density and strain rate. Science 1976; 194: 1174-6
45. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59: 954-62
46. Kopperdahl DL, Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 801-5.