The influence of endplate-to-endplate cement augmentation on vertebral strength and stiffness in vertebroplasty

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 15, 2007, Pages

  Steens, Jeroen ^a   Verdonschot, Nico ^a   Aalsma, Arthur M M ^b   Hosman, Allard J F ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b BAAT Medical   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Osteoporosis; PMMA; Vertebral fractures; Vertebroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CADAVER; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MECHANICAL STRESS; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VERTEBRA;

BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOPOROSIS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RESIN CEMENTS; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 34447309738     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074d4b9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA. Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 2003;114:257-65.
2. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 1987;33:166-8.
3. Laredo JD, Hamze B. Complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty and their prevention. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:493-505.
4. Belkoff SM, Jasper LE, Stevens SS. An ex vivo evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used to reduce fractures within vertebral bodies under load. Spine 2002;27:1640-3.
5. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine 2001;26:151-6.
6. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, et al. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: the effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine 2001;26:1537-41.
7. Eriksson SA, Isberg BO, Lindgren JU. Prediction of vertebral strength by dual photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:243-50.
8. Gaitanis IN, Carandang G, Phillips FM, et al. Restoring geometric and loading alignment of the thoracic spine with a vertebral compression fracture: effects of balloon (bone tamp) inflation and spinal extension. Spine J 2005;5:45-54.
9. Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 2003;28:1549-54.
10. Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 1999;24:1772-6.
11. Tomita S, Molloy S, Jasper LE, et al. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements. Spine 2004;29:1203-7.