Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 147, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 389-399

  Prummel, Maegan V ^a   Done, Susan J ^b,c   Muradali, Derek ^a   Majpruz, Vicky ^a   Brown, Patrick ^a,c   Jiang, Hedy ^a   Shumak, Rene S ^a   Yaffe, Martin J ^d   Holloway, Claire M B ^c,d   Chiarelli, Anna M ^a,c  

^a CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computed radiography; Digital mammography; Direct radiography; Grade; Hormone receptor status; Prognostic features; Stage; Tumour size

Indexed keywords

AGED; BREAST TUMOR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84930003842     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3088-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151(10):716–726 W-236
2. The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2011) Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40–74 years. Can Med Assoc J 183(17):1991–2001. doi:10.1503/cmaj.110334
3. Lewin JM, D’Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, Cutter GR (2002) Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(3):671–677
4. Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program–the Oslo II Study. Radiology 232(1):197–204. doi:10.1148/radiol.2321031624
5. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D’Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353(17):1773–1783. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052911
6. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Martinelli F, Lazzari B, Houssami N (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(4):860–866. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2303
7. Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, Dos Santos Silva IM (2009) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 251(2):347–358. doi:10.1148/radiol.2512081235
8. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O’Doherty A, Flanagan FL (2009) Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4):1010–1018
9. Domingo L, Romero A, Belvis F, Sanchez M, Ferrer J, Salas D, Ibanez J, Vega A, Ferrer F, Laso MS, Macia F, Castells X, Sala M (2011) Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur Radiol 21(9):2020–2028 Epub 2011 May 2011
10. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD, Taplin SH, Sickles EA (2011) Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 155(8):493–502
11. Feeley L, Kiernan D, Mooney T, Flanagan F, Hargaden G, Kell M, Stokes M, Kennedy M (2011) Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study. J Clin Pathol 64(3):215–219. doi:10.1136/jcp.2010.085860
12. Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ (2012) Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology 265(3):707–714. doi:10.1148/radiol.12111461
13. Nederend J, Duijm LE, Louwman MW, Groenewoud JH, Donkers-van Rossum AB, Voogd AC (2012) Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study. Ann Oncol 23(12):3098–3103. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds146
14. Hoff SR, Abrahamsen AL, Samset JH, Vigeland E, Klepp O, Hofvind S (2012) Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography—results from a retrospective review. Radiology 264(2):378–386. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112074
15. Sala M, Salas D, Belvis F, Sanchez M, Ferrer J, Ibanez J, Roman R, Ferrer F, Vega A, Laso MS, Castells X (2011) Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain. Radiology 258(2):388–395. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100874
16. Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, Prummel MV, Muradali D, Majpruz V, Done SJ, Brown P, Shumak RS, Yaffe MJ (2013) Digital compared with screen-film mammography: performance measures in concurrent cohorts within an organized breast screening program. Radiology 268(3):684–693. doi:10.1148/radiol.13122567
17. Seradour B, Heid P, Esteve J (2014) Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(1):229–236. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10419
18. van Luijt PA, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ (2013) Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens. Eur J Cancer. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020
19. Drukker CA, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJ, Cardoso F, Kerlikowske K, Esserman LJ, van Leeuwen FE, Pijnappel RM, Slaets L, Bogaerts J, Van’t Veer LJ (2014) Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144(1):103–111. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2830-5
20. Bosmans H, De Hauwere A, Lemmens K, Zanca F, Thierens H, Van Ongeval C, Van Herck K, Van Steen A, Martens P, Bleyen L, Vande Putte G, Kellen E, Mortier G, Van Limbergen E (2013) Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography. Eur Radiol 23(10):2891–2898. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2876-0
21. Nederend J, Duijm LE, Louwman MW, Coebergh JW, Roumen RM, Lohle PN, Roukema JA, Rutten MJ, van Steenbergen LN, Ernst MF, Jansen FH, Plaisier ML, Hooijen MJ, Voogd AC (2013) Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - A population based study from the Netherlands. Eur J Cancer. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.018
22. Chiarelli AM, Halapy E, Nadalin V, Shumak R, O’Malley F, Mai V (2006) Performance measures from 10 years of breast screening in the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990/91 to 2000. Eur J Cancer Prev 15(1):34–42
23. American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
24. Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19(5):403–410
25. World Health Organization (1990) International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), 2nd edn. WHO, Geneva
26. SAS Institute Inc (2008) Statistical Analysis Software 9.2 ed. Cary: SAS Institute
27. Juel IM, Skaane P, Hoff SR, Johannessen G, Hofvind S (2010) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: the Sogn and Fjordane study. Acta Radiol 51(9):962–968
28. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 18(1):183–191. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0730-y
29. Yaffe M, Bloomquist A, Hunter D, Mawdsley GE, Chiarelli A, Muradali D, Mainprize JG (2013) Comparative performance of modern digital mammography systems in a large breast screening program. Med Phys 40(12):121915. doi:10.1118/1.4829516
30. Brekelmans CT, van Gorp JM, Peeters PH, Collette HJ (1996) Histopathology and growth rate of interval breast carcinoma Characterization of different subgroups. Cancer 78(6):1220–1228. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960915)78:6<1220:AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-D