Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 202, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 229-236

  Séradour, Brigitte ^a   Heid, Patrice ^a   Estève, Jacques ^b  

^a ARCADES Assoc Pour la Rech et le Dep des Can du Sein du Col de l'Uter et des Can Colorectaux   (France)

^b HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast cancer screening; Breast imaging; Digital mammography; Film screen mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DENSITY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIRECT DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FILM SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY; FRANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84891931268     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10419     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lipasti S, Anttila A, Pamilo M. Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program. Acta Radiol 2010; 51:491-497
2. Heddson B, Ronnow K, Olsson M, Miller D. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64:419-425
3. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al.; Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1773-1783
4. Van Ongeval C, Van Steen A, Vande Putte G, et al. Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography? Eur Radiol 2010; 20:2307-2314
5. Weigel S, Decker T, Korsching E, Hungermann D, Böcker W, Heindel W. Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers? Radiology 2010; 255:738-745
6. Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, Dos Santos Silva IM. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 2009; 251:347-358
7. Lastier D, Salines E, Rogel A. Évaluation du programme de dépistage organisé du cancer du sein en France: résultats 2009, évolutions depuis 2005. Saint-Maurice, France: Institut de veille sanitaire, 2012
8. Perry N, Broeders M, deWolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L, eds. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2006
9. American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
10. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in populationbased screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 2007; 244:708-717
11. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:183-191
12. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR 2007; 189:860-866
13. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL. Comparison of digital mammography and screening-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish Breast Screening Program-. AJR 2009; 193:1010-1018
14. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009; 253:353-358
15. Skaane P. Digital mammography in European population-based screening programs. In: Bick U, Diekmann F, eds. Digital mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2009:155-176
16. Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:493-502
17. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankankas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:168-175
18. Séradour B, Estève J, Heid P, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and screening mammography: analysis of the results in the Bouches du Rhône programme. J Med Screen 1999; 6:99-102
19. Pisano ED, Zuley M, Baum JK, Marques HS. Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45:813-830
20. Perry NM, Patani N, Milner SE, et al. The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:676-682
21. Feeley L, Kiernan D, Mooney T, et al. Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study. J Clin Pathol 2011; 64:215-219
22. Van Ongeval C, Bosmans H, Van Steen A, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:1360-1366
23. Warren LM, Mackenzie A, Cooke J, et al. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. Med Phys 2012; 39:3202-3213
24. Sala M, Salas D, Belvis F, et al. Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain. Radiology 2011; 258:388-395
25. Skaane P. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 2009; 50:3-14
26. Séradour B, Ancelle-Park R. Dépistage organisé des Cancers du Sein: peut-on comparer les résultats du programme français aux résultats internationaux? J Radiol 2006; 87:1009-1014
27. Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijerinck D, et al. Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:2067-2073
28. Pisano ED, Hendrick EE, Yaffe MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population sub-groups in DMIST. Radiology 2008; 246:376-383
29. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 2005; 14:269-275
30. Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology. 2012; 265:707-714
31. Public Health England website. NHS Breast Screening Programme: mammography equipment - equipment evaluation and guidance. www.cancerscreening. nhs.uk/breastscreen//publications/mammography-equipment.html. Accessed September 10, 2013