Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: A multicenter study

Radiology

Volumn 265, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 707-714

  Bluekens, Adriana M J ^a,b   Holland, Roland ^a   Karssemeijer, Nico ^c   Broeders, Mireille J M ^a,c   Den Heeten, Gerard J ^a,d  

^a National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening   (Netherlands)

^b CPRLab   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPH; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREEN FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; X RAY FILM;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 84870024587     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111461     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, van Dijck JA, et al. Decreased rates of advanced breast cancer due to mammography screening in the Netherlands. Br J Cancer 2004;91(5):861-867. (Pubitemid 39273776)
2. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Interim report 2011. Main results 2008-2009 breast cancer screening programme in the Netherlands. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Department of Public Health, Erasmus University, 2011.
3. de Koning HJ, Draisma G, Fracheboud J, de Bruijn A. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: microsimulation modelling estimates based on observed screen and clinical data. Breast Cancer Res 2006;8(1):202.
4. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94(20):1546-1554. (Pubitemid 35277278)
5. Sørum R, Hofvind S, Skaane P, Haldorsen T. Trends in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ: the effect of a population-based screening programme. Breast 2010;19(6):499-505.
6. van Steenbergen LN, Voogd AC, Roukema JA, et al. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;115(1):181-183.
7. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353(17):1773-1783. (Pubitemid 41549889)
8. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 2007;244(3):708-717. (Pubitemid 47292081)
9. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 2008;18(1):183-191. (Pubitemid 351217291)
10. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009;253(2):353-358.
11. Domingo L, Romero A, Belvis F, et al. Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur Radiol 2011;21(9):2020-2028.
12. Cady B. How to prevent invasive breast cancer: detect and excise duct carcinoma in situ. J Surg Oncol 1998;69(2):60-62. (Pubitemid 28515960)
13. Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(4):CD001877.
14. Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ 2009;339:b2587.
15. Patchefsky AS, Schwartz GF, Finkelstein SD, et al. Heterogeneity of intraductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 1989;63(4):731-741. (Pubitemid 19050278)
16. Lagios MD. Heterogeneity of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS): relationship of grade and subtype analysis to local recurrence and risk of invasive transformation. Cancer Lett 1995;90(1):97-102.
17. Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis RR, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994;11(3):167-180. (Pubitemid 24308077)
18. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH, et al. A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 1996;77(11):2267-2274. (Pubitemid 26162419)
19. Evans AJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Wilson AR. Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease? J Med Screen 2001;8(3):149-151. (Pubitemid 32929841)
20. Kessar P, Perry N, Vinnicombe SJ, Hussain HK, Carpenter R, Wells CA. How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme? Clin Radiol 2002;57(9):807-814. (Pubitemid 35314933)
21. Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijerinck D, et al. Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates. Eur Radio. 2010;20(9):2067-2073.
22. Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PM, et al. Nation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer 1998;75(5):694-698. (Pubitemid 28145815)
23. Holland R, Rijken H, Hendriks J. The Dutch population-based mammography screening: 30-year experience. Breast Care 2007;2(1):12-18. (Pubitemid 46364551)
24. Devilee P, Tavassoli FA. World Health Organization: tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2003.
25. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2002.
26. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(4):1010-1018.
27. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(4):860-866. (Pubitemid 47479768)
28. Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH, et al. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97(10):748-754. (Pubitemid 40872381)
29. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42(5):793-806, v. (Pubitemid 39165063)
30. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Olsen AH, et al. Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England. J Med Screen 2010;17(1):25-30.
31. Kopans DB, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammographic screening and "overdiagnosis". Radiology 2011;260(3):616-620.
32. Jørgensen KJ, Keen JD, Gøtzsche PC. Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality? Radiology 2011;260(3):621-627.
33. Jones JL. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: progression of ductal carcinoma in situ: the pathological perspective. Breast Cancer Res 2006;8(2):204.
34. Sanders ME, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD, Page DL. The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up. Cancer 2005;103(12):2481-2484. (Pubitemid 40800525)
35. Perry NM, Patani N, Milner SE, et al. The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit. Eur Radiol 2011;21(4):676-682.
36. Feeley L, Kiernan D, Mooney T, et al. Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study. J Clin Pathol 2011;64(3):215-219.
37. Hofvind S, Vacek PM, Skelly J, Weaver DL, Geller BM. Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(15):1082-1091.