Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment-A population based study from the Netherlands

European Journal of Cancer

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 31-39

  Nederend, Joost ^a   Duijm, Lucien E M ^b   Louwman, Marieke W J ^c   Coebergh, Jan Willem ^c   Roumen, Rudi M H ^d   Lohle, Paul N ^e   Roukema, Jan A ^e   Rutten, Matthieu J C M ^f   Van Steenbergen, Liza N ^c   Ernst, Miranda F ^f   Jansen, Frits H ^a   Plaisier, Menno L ^d   Hooijen, Marianne J H H ^g   Voogd, Adri C ^c,h  

^a CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b CANISIUS WILHELMINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c The Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^d MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology   (Netherlands)

^f JEROEN BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^g ST ANNA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^h MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Digital mammography; Interval cancer; Referral rate; Screening mammography; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; TUMOR VOLUME;

BREAST CANCER; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; INTERVAL CANCER; REFERRAL RATE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84891634064     PISSN: 09598049     EISSN: 18790852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. J. Nederend, L.E. Duijm, M.W. Louwman, J.H. Groenewoud, A.B. Donkers-van Rossum, and A.C. Voogd Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study Ann Oncol 23 2012 3098 3103
2. E.D. Pisano, R.E. Hendrick, M.J. Yaffe, J.K. Baum, S. Acharyya, and J.B. Cormack et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST Radiology 246 2008 376 383
3. P. Skaane, S. Hofvind, and A. Skjennald Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study Radiology 244 2007 708 717
4. M.A. Raja, A. Hubbard, and A.R. Salman Interval breast cancer: is it a different type of breast cancer? Breast 10 2001 100 108
5. L.E. Duijm, J.H. Groenewoud, H.J. de Koning, J.W. Coebergh, M. van Beek, and M.J. Hooijen et al. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography Eur J Cancer 45 2009 774 781
6. B. Vitak, K.E. Olsen, J.C. Manson, L.G. Arnesson, and O. Stal Tumour characteristics and survival in patients with invasive interval breast cancer classified according to mammographic findings at the latest screening: a comparison of true interval and missed interval cancers Eur Radiol 9 1999 460 469
7. S. Hofvind, B. Geller, and P. Skaane Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers Acta Radiol 49 2008 975 981
8. L. Domingo, M. Sala, S. Servitja, J.M. Corominas, F. Ferrer, and J. Martinez et al. Phenotypic characterization and risk factors for interval breast cancers in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Barcelona, Spain Cancer Causes Control 21 2010 1155 1164
9. A.J. Winzelberg, C. Classen, G.W. Alpers, H. Roberts, C. Koopman, and R.E. Adams et al. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer Cancer 97 2003 1164 1173
10. S. Ciatto, S. Catarzi, M.P. Lamberini, G. Risso, G. Saguatti, and T. Abbattista et al. Interval breast cancers in screening: the effect of mammography review method on classification Breast 16 2007 646 652
11. K. Moberg, H. Grundstrom, S. Tornberg, H. Lundquist, G. Svane, and L. Havervall et al. Two models for radiological reviewing of interval cancers J Med Screen 6 1999 35 39
12. S. Hofvind, P. Skaane, B. Vitak, H. Wang, S. Thoresen, and L. Eriksen et al. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program Radiology 237 2005 437 443
13. J. Nederend, L.E. Duijm, A.C. Voogd, J.H. Groenewoud, F.H. Jansen, and M.W. Louwman Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study Breast Cancer Res 14 2012 R10
14. S.R. Hoff, A.L. Abrahamsen, J.H. Samset, E. Vigeland, O. Klepp, and S. Hofvind Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-results from a retrospective review Radiology 264 2012 378 386
15. L.E. Duijm, J.H. Groenewoud, J. Fracheboud, and H.J. de Koning Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters J Natl Cancer Inst 99 2007 1162 1170
16. L.E. Duijm, J.H. Groenewoud, J.H. Hendriks, and H.J. de Koning Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements Radiology 231 2004 564 570
17. R.M. Maes, D.J. Dronkers, J.H. Hendriks, M.A. Thijssen, and H.W. Nab Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment? Br J Radiol 70 1997 34 38
18. C.J. D'Orsi, E.B. Mendelson, and D.M. Ikeda et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-breast imaging atlas 2003 American College of Radiology Reston, VA
19. L.E. Duijm, J.H. Groenewoud, F.H. Jansen, J. Fracheboud, M. van Beek, and H.J. de Koning Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening Br J Cancer 91 2004 1795 1799
20. Stephen BE, David RB, Carolyn CC, April GF, Frederick LG, Andrew T. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
21. N. Perry, M. Broeders, C. de Wolf, S. Tornberg, R. Holland, and L. von Karsa European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition-summary document Ann Oncol 19 2008 614 622
22. N. Karssemeijer, A.M. Bluekens, D. Beijerinck, J.J. Deurenberg, M. Beekman, and R. Visser et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program Radiology 253 2009 353 358
23. E. Vigeland, H. Klaasen, T.A. Klingen, S. Hofvind, and P. Skaane Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study Eur Radiol 18 2008 183 191
24. N.M. Hambly, M.M. McNicholas, N. Phelan, G.C. Hargaden, A. O'Doherty, and F.L. Flanagan Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 2009 1010 1018
25. S. Vinnicombe, S.M. Pinto Pereira, V.A. McCormack, S. Shiel, N. Perry, and I.M.D. Silva Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data Radiology 251 2009 347 358
26. L. Domingo, A. Romero, F. Belvis, M. Sanchez, J. Ferrer, and D. Salas et al. Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain Eur Radiol 21 2011 2020 2028
27. E.D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, J.K. Baum, and S. Acharyya et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 2005 1773 1783
28. K. Kerlikowske, R.A. Hubbard, D.L. Miglioretti, B.M. Geller, B.C. Yankaskas, and C.D. Lehman et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study Ann Intern Med 155 2011 493 502
29. R. de Gelder, J. Fracheboud, E.A. Heijnsdijk, G. den Heeten, A.L. Verbeek, and M.J. Broeders et al. Digital mammography screening: weighing reduced mortality against increased overdiagnosis Prev Med 53 2011 134 140
30. A.M. Bluekens, N. Karssemeijer, D. Beijerinck, J.J. Deurenberg, R.E. van Engen, and M.J. Broeders et al. Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates Eur Radiol 20 2010 2067 2073
31. J. Fracheboud, H.J. de Koning, P.M. Beemsterboer, R. Boer, A.L. Verbeek, and J.H. Hendriks et al. Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme Br J Cancer 81 1999 912 917
32. C.T. Brekelmans, J.M. van Gorp, P.H. Peeters, and H.J. Collette Histopathology and growth rate of interval breast carcinoma. Characterization of different subgroups Cancer 78 1996 1220 1228
33. W.A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M.S. NessAiver, W.B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, and R.S. Lewis et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 2004 830 849
34. E.C. Dowling, C. Klabunde, J. Patnick, and R. Ballard-Barbash Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries J Med Screen 17 2010 139 146
35. Dutch Cancer Registry. Cijfers over kanker. Available from: http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl/. [Accessed 13th August 2013].