Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: A comparative study

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 215-219

  Feeley, Linda ^a   Kiernan, Donal ^b   Mooney, Therese ^b   Flanagan, Fidelma ^a   Hargaden, Gormlaith ^a   Kell, Malcolm ^a   Stokes, Maurice ^a   Kennedy, Margaret ^a  

^a MATER MISERICORDIAE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b BreastCheck   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREEN FILM MAMMOGRAPHY;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRELAND; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 79951953411     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: 14724146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2010.085860     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bick U, Diekmann F. Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur Radiol 2007;17:1931-42.
2. Kim HH, Pisano ED, Cole EB, et al. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:47-50. (Pubitemid 46100144)
3. Seo BK, Pisano ED, Kuzmiak CM, et al. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer: full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol 2006;13:1229-35. (Pubitemid 44363170)
4. Skaane P. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 2009;50:3-14.
5. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, et al. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County study. Eur Radiol 2008;18:183-91. (Pubitemid 351217291)
6. Bleukens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijerinck D, et al. Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and longterm impact on referral rates. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2067-73.
7. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:860-6. (Pubitemid 47479768)
8. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, et al. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast cancer screening program. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1010-18.
9. Heddson B, Rönnow K, Olsson M, et al. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 2007;64:419-25. (Pubitemid 350116481)
10. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after the introduction of digital mammography in a population- based screening program. Radiology 2009;253:353-8.
11. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001;218:873-80. (Pubitemid 32172576)
12. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:671-7. (Pubitemid 34919579)
13. Lipasti S, Antilla A, Pamilo M. Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program. Acta Radiol 2010;51:491-7.
14. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-83. (Pubitemid 41549889)
15. Skaane S, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 2007;244:708-17. (Pubitemid 47292081)
16. Skaane P, Skejennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program - the Oslo II study. Radiology 2004;232:197-204. (Pubitemid 38787838)
17. Skaane P, Skjennald A, Young K, et al. Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with softcopy reading. Acta Radiol 2005;46:679-89.
18. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study. Radiology 2003;229:877-84. (Pubitemid 37467596)
19. Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 2009;251:347-58.
20. Non operative Diagnosis Subgroup of the National Coordinating Committee for Breast Screening Pathology. Guidelines for Non-Operative Diagnostic Procedures and Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening. NHSBSP Publication Number 50. Sheffield, UK: NHS Breast Screening Programme Publications, 2001. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp50.pdf.
21. Purdie CA, McLean D, Stormonth E, et al. Management of in situ lobular neoplasia detected on needle core biopsy of breast. J Clin Pathol 2010;63:987-93.
22. Middleton LP, Grant S, Stephens T, et al. Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised? Mod Pathol 2003;16:120-9.
23. Crisi GM, Mandavilli S, Cronin E, et al. Invasive mammary carcinoma after immediate and short-term follow-up for lobular neoplasia on core biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:325-33. (Pubitemid 36245797)
24. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2679-83.
25. Dershaw DD. Film or digital mammographic screening? N Engl J Med 2005;353:1846-7.
26. Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:1-10. (Pubitemid 351664941)
27. Subhawong AP, Subhawong TK, Khouri N, et al. Incidental minimal atypical lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy: correlation with findings on follow-up excision. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:822-8.
28. European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. 4th edn. In: Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al, eds. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2006.