Genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required to foster tolerance towards industrial wheat straw hydrolysates

Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 41, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1753-1761

  Pereira, Francisco B ^a   Teixeira, Miguel C ^b   Mira, Nuno P ^b   Sá Correia, Isabel ^b   Domingues, Lucília ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Bio ethanol production; Chemogenomic analysis; Inhibitor tolerance; Lignocellulose hydrolysates; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; FURFURAL; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

ANTIFUNGAL RESISTANCE; BIOMASS; DRUG EFFECTS; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WHEAT;

ACETIC ACID; BIOMASS; DRUG RESISTANCE, FUNGAL; FERMENTATION; FURALDEHYDE; GENES, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; LIGNIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TRITICUM;

EID: 84929941635     PISSN: 13675435     EISSN: 14765535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-014-1519-z     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Almario MP, Reyes LH, Kao KC (2013) Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced tolerance to hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng. doi:10.1002/bit.24938
2. Almeida JR, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2007) Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82:340–349. doi:10.1002/jctb.1676
3. Ask M, Bettiga M, Mapelli V, Olsson L (2013) The influence of HMF and furfural on redox-balance and energy-state of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:22. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-22
4. Ayer A, Sanwald J, Pillay BA, Meyer AJ, Perrone GG, Dawes IW (2013) Distinct Redox Regulation in Sub-Cellular Compartments in Response to Various Stress Conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 8:e65240. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065240
5. Bajwa PK, Ho CY, Chan CK, Martin VJ, Trevors JT, Lee H (2013) Transcriptional profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae T2 cells upon exposure to hardwood spent sulphite liquor: comparison to acetic acid, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 103:1281–1295. doi:10.1007/s10482-013-9909-1
6. Dos Santos SC, Teixeira MC, Cabrito TR, Sa-Correia I (2013) Yeast toxicogenomics: genome-wide responses to chemical stresses with impact in environmental health, pharmacology, and biotechnology. Front Genet 3:63. doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00063
7. Dunlop MJ (2011) Engineering microbes for tolerance to next-generation biofuels. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:32. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-4-32
8. Endo A, Nakamura T, Ando A, Tokuyasu K, Shima J (2008) Genome-wide screening of the genes required for tolerance to vanillin, which is a potential inhibitor of bioethanol fermentation, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-1-3
9. Gorsich SW, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Skory CD (2006) Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:339–349. doi:10.1007/s00253-005-0142-3
10. Heer D, Sauer U (2008) Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbial Biotechnol 1:497–506. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00050.x
11. Huang RL, Su RX, Qi W, He ZM (2011) Bioconversion of lignocellulose into bioethanol: process intensification and mechanism research. Bioenergy Res 4:225–245. doi:10.1007/s12155-011-9125-7
12. Li BZ, Yuan YJ (2010) Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1915–1924. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2518-2
13. Li M, Petteys BJ, McClure JM, Valsakumar V, Bekiranov S, Frank EL, Smith JS (2010) Thiamine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by the NAD + -dependent histone deacetylase Hst1. Mol Cell Biol 30:3329–3341. doi:10.1128/MCB.01590-09
14. Lin FM, Qiao B, Yuan YJ (2009) Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3765–3776. doi:10.1128/AEM.02594-08
15. Liu ZL (2011) Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:809–825. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3167-9
16. Liu ZL (2006) Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73:27–36. doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0567-3
17. Liu ZL, Ma M, Song M (2009) Evolutionarily engineered ethanologenic yeast detoxifies lignocellulosic biomass conversion inhibitors by reprogrammed pathways. Mol Genet Genomics 282:233–244. doi:10.1007/s00438-009-0461-7
18. Ma M, Liu LZ (2010) Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Microbiol 10:169. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-169
19. Madhavan A, Srivastava A, Kondo A, Bisaria VS (2012) Bioconversion of lignocellulose-derived sugars to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Crit Rev Biotechnol 32:2–48. doi:10.3109/07388551.2010.539551
20. Mira NP, Becker JD, Sa-Correia I (2010) Genomic expression program involving the Haa1p-regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to acetic acid. OMICS 14:587–601. doi:10.1089/omi.2010.0048
21. Mira NP, Palma M, Guerreiro JF, Sa-Correia I (2010) Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for tolerance to acetic acid. Microb Cell Fact 9:79. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-9-79
22. Mira NP, Teixeira MC, Sá-Correia I (2010) Adaptative response and tolerance to weak acid stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide view. OMICS 14:525–540. doi:10.1089/omi.2010.0072
23. Modig T, Almeida JR, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Liden G (2008) Variability of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to lignocellulose hydrolysate. Biotechnol Bioeng 100:423–429. doi:10.1002/bit.21789
24. Modig T, Liden G, Taherzadeh MJ (2002) Inhibition effects of furfural on alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Biochem J 363:769–776
25. Mroczek S, Kufel J (2008) Apoptotic signals induce specific degradation of ribosomal RNA in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 36:2874–2888. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm1100
26. Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Guimaraes PM, Silva JP, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, Vicente A, Domingues L, Teixeira JA (2000) Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol Adv 28:817–830. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.07.001
27. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioress Technol 74:17–24. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00160-1
28. Pereira FB, Gomes DG, Guimaraes PM, Teixeira JA, Domingues L (2011) Cell recycling during repeated very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations using the industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain PE-2. Biotechnol Lett 34:45–53. doi:10.1007/s10529-011-0735-0
29. Pereira FB, Guimaraes PM, Teixeira JA, Domingues L (2011) Robust industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentations. J Biosci Bioeng 112:130–136. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.03.022
30. Pereira FB, Guimaraes PM, Gomes DG, Mira NP, Teixeira MC, Sa-Correia I, Domingues L (2011) Identification of candidate genes for yeast engineering to improve bioethanol production in very high gravity and lignocellulosic biomass industrial fermentations. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:57. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-4-57
31. Ruiz HA, Ruzene DS, Silva DP, da Silva FF, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA (2011) Development and characterization of an environmentally friendly process sequence (autohydrolysis and organosolv) for wheat straw delignification. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 164:629–641. doi:10.1007/s12010-011-9163-9
32. Siegers K, Waldmann T, Leroux MR, Grein K, Shevchenko A, Schiebel E, Hartl FU (1999) Compartmentation of protein folding in vivo: sequestration of non-native polypeptide by the chaperonin–GimC system. EMBO J 18:75–84. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.1.75
33. Taylor MP, Mulako I, Tuffin M, Cowan D (2012) Understanding physiological responses to pre-treatment inhibitors in ethanologenic fermentations. Biotechnol J 7:1169–1181. doi:10.1002/biot.201100335
34. Teixeira MC, Raposo LR, Mira NP, Lourenco AB, Sa-Correia I (2009) Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5761–5772. doi:10.1128/AEM.00845-09
35. Teixeira MC, Raposo LR, Palma M, Sa-Correia I (2010) Identification of genes required for maximal tolerance to high-glucose concentrations, as those present in industrial alcoholic fermentation media, through a chemogenomics approach. OMICS 14:201–210. doi:10.1089/omi.2009.0149
36. Teixeira MC, Mira NP, Sa-Correia I (2010) A genome-wide perspective on the response and tolerance to food-relevant stresses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:150–156. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.011
37. York JD, Odom AR, Murphy R, Ives EB, Wente SR (1999) A phospholipase C-dependent inositol polyphosphate kinase pathway required for efficient messenger RNA export. Science 285:96–100. doi:10.1126/science.285.5424.96