Naturalization of central European plants in North America: Species traits, habitats, propagule pressure, residence time

Ecology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 762-774

  Pyšek, Petr ^a,b,c   Manceur, Ameur M ^d   Alba, Christina ^a   McGregor, Kirsty F ^a,b,e   Pergl, Jan ^a   Štajerová, Kateřina ^a,b   Chytrý, Milan ^f   Danihelka, Jiří ^a,f   Kartesz, John ^g   Klimešová, Jitka ^a   Lučanová, Magdalena ^a   Moravcová, Lenka ^a   Nishino, Misako ^g   Sádlo, Jiří ^a   Suda, Jan ^a,b   Tichý, Lubomír ^f   Kühn, Ingolf ^d,h,i  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^d HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^f MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^g Biota of North America Program   (United States)

^h MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

ⁱ GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IDIV HALLE JENA LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biological traits; Cultivation; Exotic species; Native range; Path analysis; Plant invasion; Propagule pressure; Residence time

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; HABITAT SELECTION; INVASIVENESS; NATURALIZATION; PATH ANALYSIS; PERSISTENCE; PLANT COMMUNITY; RESIDENCE TIME; TOLERANCE;

NORTH AMERICA;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EUROPE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NORTH AMERICA; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ECOSYSTEM; EUROPE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NORTH AMERICA; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84929660195     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/14-1005.1     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Blackburn, T. M., P. Pyšek, S. Bacher, J. T. Carlton, R. P. Duncan, V. Jarošík, J. R. U. Wilson, and D. M. Richardson. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:333-339.
2. Blumenthal, D., C. E. Mitchell, P. Pyšek, and V. Jarošík. 2009. Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:7899-7904.
3. Bucharová, A., and M. van Kleunen. 2009. Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. Journal of Ecology 97:230-238.
4. Castro, S. A., J. A. Figueroa, M. Muñoz-Schick, and F. M. Jaksic. 2005. Minimum residence time, biogeographic origin, and life cycle as determinants of the geographic extent of naturalized plants in continental Chile. Diversity and Distributions 11:183-191.
5. Castro-Díez, P., O. Godoy, A. Saldaña, and D. M. Richardson. 2011. Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use. Diversity and Distributions 17:934-945.
6. Catford, J. A., R. Jansson, and C. Nilsson. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions 15:22-40.
7. Chytrý, M., V. Jarošík, P. Pyšek, O. Hájek, I. Knollová, L. Tichý, and J. Danihelka. 2008. Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89: 1541-1553.
8. Colautti, R. I., I. A. Grigorovich, and H. J. MacIsaac. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 8:1023-1037.
9. Colautti, R. I., and H. J. MacIsaac. 2004. A neutral terminology to define 'invasive' species. Diversity and Distributions 10:135-141.
10. Colautti, R. I., J. D. Parker, M. W. Cadotte, P. Pyšek, C. S. Brown, D. F. Sax, and D. M. Richardson. 2014. Quantifying the invasiveness of species. NeoBiota 21:7-27.
11. Daehler, C. C., and D. A. Carino. 2000. Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions 2:93-102.
12. Danihelka, J., J. Chrtek, Jr., and Z. Kaplan. 2012. Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 84:647-811.
13. Dawson, W., D. F. R. P. Burslem, and P. E. Hulme. 2009. Herbivory is related to taxonomic isolation, but not to invasiveness of tropical alien plants. Diversity and Distributions 15:141-147.
14. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., J. Touza, C. Perrings, and M. Williamson. 2007. A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Diversity and Distributions 13: 527-534.
15. di Castri, F. 1990. On invading species and invaded ecosystems: the interplay of historical chance and biological necessity. Pages 3-16 in F. di Castri, A. J. Hansen, and M. Debussche, editors. Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
16. Dostál, P., W. Dawson, M. van Kleunen, L. H. Keser, and M. Fischer. 2013. Central European plant species from more productive habitats are more invasive at a global scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22:64-72.
17. Drake, J. A., H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson, editors. 1989. Biological invasions: a global perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
18. Durka, W., and S. G. Michalski. 2012. Daphne: a dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. Ecology 93:2297.
19. Ellenberg, H. 1988. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
20. Gassó, N., P. Pyšek, M. Vilà, and M. Williamson. 2010. Spreading to a limit: the time required for a neophyte to reach its maximum range. Diversity and Distributions 16: 310-311.
21. Gioria, M., V. Jarošík, and P. Pyšek. 2014. Impact of alien invasive plants on soil seed bank communities: emerging patterns. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 16:132-142.
22. Gioria, M., P. Pyšek, and L. Moravcová. 2012. Soil seed banks in plant invasions: promoting species invasiveness and longterm impact on plant community dynamics. Preslia 84:327-350.
23. Gravuer, K., J. J. Sullivan, P. A. Williams, and R. P. Duncan. 2008. Strong human association with plant invasion success for Trifolium introductions to New Zealand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:6344-6349.
24. Grime, J. 2001. Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Second edition. John Wiley and Sons, London, UK.
25. Grotkopp, E., M. Rejmánek, and T. L. Rost. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. American Naturalist 159:396-419.
26. Gurevitch, J., G. A. Fox, G. M. Wardle, Inderjit, and D. Taub. 2011. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecology Letters 14:407-418.
27. Hanspach, J., I. Kühn, P. Pyšek, E. Boos, and S. Klotz. 2008. Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 10:241-250.
28. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, UK.
29. Hejda, M., P. Pyšek, J. Pergl, J. Sádlo, M. Chytrý, and V. Jarošík. 2009. Invasion success of alien plants: do habitats affinities in the native distribution range matter? Global Ecology and Biogeography 18:372-382.
30. Honaker, J., G. King, and M. Blackwell. 2011. Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software 45. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v45/i07/paper
31. Hulme, P. E. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:10-18.
32. Hulme, P. E. 2011. Addressing the threat to biodiversity from botanic gardens. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:168-174.
33. Hulme, P. E., et al. 2008. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:403-414.
34. Jeschke, J. M., and D. L. Strayer. 2006. Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Global Change Biology 12:1608-1619.
35. Kalusová, V., M. Chytrý, J. T. Kartesz, M. Nishino, and P. Pyšek. 2013. Where do they come from and where do they go? European habitats as donors of alien plants globally. Diversity and Distributions 19:199-214.
36. Kartesz, J. T. 2010. North American vascular flora. Biota of North America Program (BONAP), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. http://www.BONAP.org
37. Kartesz, J. T., and C. A. Meacham. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora. Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
38. Kattge, J., et al. 2011. TRY: a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology 17:2905-2935.
39. Kleyer, M., et al. 2008. The LEDA Traitbase: a database of lifehistory traits of Northwest European flora. Journal of Ecology 96:1266-1274.
40. Kolar, C. S., and D. M. Lodge. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233-1236.
41. Kubešová, M., L. Moravcová, J. Suda, V. Jarošík, and P. Pyšek. 2010. Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora. Preslia 82:81-96.
42. Kueffer, C., P. Pyšek, and D. M. Richardson. 2013. Integrative invasion science: model systems, multi-site studies, focused meta-analysis, and invasion syndromes. New Phytologist 200:615-633.
43. Küster, E. C., W. Durka, I. Kühn, and S. Klotz. 2010. Differences in the trait compositions of non-indigenous and native plants across Germany. Biological Invasions 12:2001-2012.
44. Küster, E. C., I. Kühn, H. Bruelheide, and S. Klotz. 2008. Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora. Journal of Ecology 96:860-868.
45. Lambdon, P. W., et al. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographic patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101-149.
46. Lavoie, C., M. A. Shah, A. Bergeron, and P. Villeneuve. 2013. Explaining invasiveness from the extent of native range: new insights from plant atlases and herbarium specimens. Diversity and Distributions 19:98-105.
47. Leishman, M. R., M. Westoby, and E. Jurado. 1995. Correlates of seed size variation: a comparison among five temperate floras. Journal of Ecology 83:517-530.
48. Lockwood, J. L., P. Cassey, and T. M. Blackburn. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:223-228.
49. Mack, R. N. 1991. The commercial seed trade: an early disperser of weeds in the United States. Economic Botany 45: 257-273.
50. Mack, R. N. 2000. Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biological Invasions 2: 111-122.
51. McGregor, K. F., M. S. Watt, P. E. Hulme, and R. P. Duncan. 2012. What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use? Diversity and Distributions 18:1013-1023.
52. Mindrila, D. 2010. Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: a comparison of estimation bias with ordinal and multivariate non-normal data. International Journal for Digital Society 1: 60-66.
53. Mitchell, C. E., D. Blumenthal, V. Jarošík, E. E. Puckett, and P. Pyšek. 2010. Controls on pathogen species richness in plants' introduced and native ranges: roles of residence time, range size, and host traits. Ecology Letters 13:1525-1535.
54. Moodley, D., S. Geerts, D. M. Richardson, and J. R. U. Wilson. 2013. Different traits determine introduction, naturalization and invasion success in woody plants: Proteaceae as a test case. PLoS ONE 8:e75078.
55. Moravcová, L., P. Pyšek, V. Jarošík, V. Havlíčková, and P. Zákravský. 2010. Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. Preslia 82:365-390.
56. Pandit, M. K., S. M. White, and J. O. Pocock. 2014. The contrasting effects of genome size, chromosome number and ploidy level on plant invasiveness: a global analysis. New Phytologist 203:697-703.
57. Parker, J. D., et al. 2013. Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges? Ecology 94:985-994.
58. Prinzing, A., W. Durka, S. Klotz, and R. Brandl. 2002. Which species become aliens? Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: 385-405.
59. Pyšek, P., et al. 2012. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (Second edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84:155-255.
60. Pyšek, P., and P. E. Hulme. 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant invasions: linking pattern to process. Ecoscience 12: 302-315.
61. Pyšek, P., and V. Jarošík. 2005. Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. Pages 77-96 in Inderjit, editor. Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkha üser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
62. Pyšek, P., et al. 2011a. Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. Ecological Monographs 81:277-293.
63. Pyšek, P., V. Jarošík, and J. Pergl. 2011b. Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as greater threat to natural areas? PLoS ONE 6:e24890.
64. Pyšek, P., V. Jarošík, J. Pergl, R. Randall, M. Chytrý, I. Kühn, L. Tichý, J. Danihelka, J. Chrtek, Jr., and J. Sádlo. 2009a. The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits. Diversity and Distributions 15:891-903.
65. Pyšek, P., M. Křivánek, and V. Jarošík. 2009b. Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90:2734-2744.
66. Pyšek, P., and D. M. Richardson. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Pages 97-125 in W. Nentwig, editor. Biological invasions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
67. Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, M. Rejmánek, G. Webster, M. Williamson, and J. Kirschner. 2004a. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131-143.
68. Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, and M. Williamson. 2004b. Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations. Diversity and Distributions 10:179-187.
69. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
70. Rejmánek, M. 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biological Conservation 78:171-181.
71. Rejmánek, M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25:497-506.
72. Rejmánek, M., and D. M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655-1661.
73. Rejmánek, M., D. M. Richardson, S. I. Higgins, M. J. Pitcairn, and E. Grotkopp. 2005. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. Pages 104-161 in H. A. Mooney, R. M. Mack, J. A. McNeely, L. Neville, P. Schei, and J. Waage, editors. Invasive alien species: searching for solutions. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
74. Richardson, D. M., and P. Pyšek. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography 30:409-431.
75. Richardson, D. M., and P. Pyšek. 2008. Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Diversity and Distributions 14:161-168.
76. Richardson, D. M., and P. Pyšek. 2012. Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographic patterns. New Phytologist 196:383-396.
77. Richardson, D. M., P. Pyšek, M. Rejmánek, M. G. Barbour, F. D. Panetta, and C. J. West. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6:93-107.
78. Ross, L. C., P. W. Lambdon, and P. E. Hulme. 2008. Disentangling the roles of climate, propagule pressure and land use on the current and potential elevational distribution of the invasive weed Oxalis pes-caprae L. on Crete. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 10:251-258.
79. Rosseel, Y. 2012. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48:1-36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02
80. Rouget, M., and D. M. Richardson. 2003. Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. American Naturalist 162:713-724.
81. Rubin, D. B. 1976. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63: 581-592.
82. Sax, D. F., and J. H. Brown. 2000. The paradox of invasion. Global Ecology and Biogeography 9:363-371.
83. Schlaepfer, D. R., M. Glättli, M. Fischer, and M. van Kleunen. 2010. A multispecies experiment in their native range indicates pre-adaptation of invasive alien plant species. New Phytologist 185:1087-1099.
84. Schmidt, J. P., and J. M. Drake. 2011. Time since introduction, seed mass, and genome size predict successful invaders among the cultivated vascular plants of Hawaii. PLoS ONE 6:e17391.
85. Simberloff, D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:81-102.
86. Sol, D., M. Vilà, and I. Kühn. 2008. The comparative analysis of historical alien introductions. Biological Invasions 10: 1119-1129.
87. Stohlgren, T. J., et al. 2011. Widespread plant species: natives versus aliens in our changing world. Biological Invasions 13: 1931-1944.
88. Strayer, D. L. 2012. Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 15:1199-1210.
89. Tabachnik, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. Fifth edition. Pearson Education, New York, New York, USA.
90. Thompson, K., J. P. Bakker, and R. M. Bekker. 1997. Soil seed banks of NW Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
91. Thuiller, W., D.M. Richardson, P. Pyšek, G. F. Midgley, G. O. Hughes, and M. Rouget. 2005. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biology 11:2234-2250.
92. Thuiller, W., D. M. Richardson, M. Rouget, Sx. Proches, and J. R. U. Wilson. 2006. Interactions between environment, species traits and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87:1755-1769.
93. van Kleunen, M., W. Dawson, D. Schaepfer, J. M. Jeschke, and M. Fischer. 2010a. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters 13:947-958.
94. van Kleunen, M., and S. D. Johnson. 2007. Effects of selfcompatibility on the distribution range of invasive European plants in North America. Conservation Biology 21:1537-1544.
95. van Kleunen, M., S. D. Johnson, and M. Fischer. 2007. Predicting naturalization of southern African Iridaceae in other regions. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:594-603.
96. van Kleunen, M., E. Weber, and M. Fischer. 2010b. A metaanalysis of trait differences between invasive and noninvasive plant species. Ecology Letters 13:235-245.
97. Williamson, M. 2006. Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion. Biological Invasions 8:1561-1568.
98. Williamson, M., K. Dehnen-Schmutz, I. Kühn, M. Hill, S. Klotz, A. Milbau, J. Stout, and P. Pyšek. 2009. The distribution of range sizes of native and alien plants in four European countries and the effects of residence time. Diversity and Distributions 15:158-166.
99. Wilson, J. R. U., D. M. Richardson, M. Rouget, Sx. Prochesx, M. A. Amis, L. Henderson, and W. Thuiller. 2007. Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Diversity and Distributions 13:11-22.