Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion

Ecology

Volumn 89, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1541-1553

  Chytrý, Milan ^a   JarošÍk, Vojtêch ^b,c   Pyšek, Petr ^b,c   Hájek, Ondřej ^a   Knollová, Ilona ^a   Tichý, Lubomír ^a   Danihelka, Jiři ^a,c  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Archaeophyte; Biological invasions; Central Europe; Czech Republic; Disturbance; Exotic species; Invasion resistance; Neophyte; Plant community; Propagule pressure

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; HABITAT QUALITY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIBILITY; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANTATION; PROPAGULE;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CZECH REPUBLIC; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

AGRICULTURE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CZECH REPUBLIC; ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 48249141683     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/07-0682.1     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alpert, P., E. Bone, and C. Holzapfel. 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3:52-66.
2. Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. G. Stone. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, California, USA,
3. Chytrý, M. 2001. Phytosociological data give biased estimates of species richness. Journal of Vegetation Science 12:439-444.
4. Chytrý, M., editor. 2007. Vegetace České republiky 1. Travinná a keříčková vegetace (Vegetation of the Czech Republic 1. Grassland and heathland vegetation). Academia, Praha, Czech Republic.
5. Chytrý, M., T. Kučera, and M. Kočí, editors. 2001. Katalog biotopů České republiky (Habitat catalogue of the Czech Republic). Agentura ochrany přirody a krajiny ČR, Praha, Czech Republic.
6. Chytrý, M., and Z. Otýpková. 2003. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:563-570.
7. Chytrý, M., P. Pyšek, L. Tichýr, I. Knollová, and J. Danihelka. 2005. Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 77:339-354.
8. Chytrý, M., and M. Rafajová. 2003. Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia 75:1-15.
9. Colautti, R. I., I. A. Grigorovich, and H. J. MacIsaac. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 8:1023-1037.
10. Crawley, M. J, 1987. What makes a community invasible? Pages 429-543 in A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley, and P. J. Edwards, editors. Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
11. Crawley, M. J. 2002. Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
12. Daehler, C. C. 2006. Invasibility of tropical islands: partitioning the influence of isolation and propagule pressure. Preslia 78: 389-404.
13. Dark, S. 2004. The biogeography of invasive alien plants in California: an application of GIS and spatial regression analysis. Diversity and Distributions 10:1-9.
14. Davies, C. E., and D. Moss. 2003. EUNIS habitat classification, August 2003. European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, Paris, France.
15. Davis, M, A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson, 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528-534.
16. De'ath, G., and K. E. Fabricius. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis, Ecology 81:3178-3192.
17. Deutschewitz, K., A. Lausch, I. Kühn, and S. Klotz. 2003. Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12:299-311.
18. di Castri, F. 1989. History of biological invasions with special emphasis on the Old World. Pages 1-30 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson, editors. Biological invasions: a global perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
19. Hastie, T. J., and D. Pregibon. 1993. Generalized linear models. Pages 195-247 in J. M. Chambers and T. J. Hastie, editors. Statistical models in S. Chapman and Hall, New York. New York, USA.
20. Hennekens, S. M., and J. H. J. Schaminée. 2001. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science 12:589-591.
21. Hierro, J. L., J. L. Maron, and R. M. Callaway. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology 93:5-15.
22. Keeley, J. E., D. Lubin, and C. J. Fotheringham. 2003. Fire and grazing impacts on plant diversity and alien plant invasions in the southern Sierra Nevada. Ecological Applications 13: 1355-1374.
23. Knollová, I., M. Chytrý, L. Tichý, and O. Hájek. 2005. Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies. Journal of Vegetation Science 16:479-486.
24. Kowarik, I. 1995. On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. Pages 83-103 in P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, and M. Wade, editors. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems, SPB Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
25. Kühn, I., R. Brandi, R. May, and S. Klotz. 2003. Plant distribution patterns in Germany: will aliens match natives? Feddes Repertorium 114:559-573.
26. Lockwood, J. L., P. Cassey, and T. Blackburn. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:223-228.
27. Lonsdale, M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522-1536.
28. Mack, R. N. 1989. Temperate grasslands vulnerable to plant invasions: characteristics and consequences, Pages 155-179 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson, editors. Biological invasions: a global perspective, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
29. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M, Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10:689-710.
30. Maskell, L. C., L. G. Firbank, K. Thompson, J. M. Bullock, and S. M. Smart. 2006. Interactions between non-native plant species and the floristic composition of common habitats. Journal of Ecology 94:1052-1060.
31. McIntyre, S., and S. Lavorel. 1994. Predicting richness of native, rare, and exotic plants in response to habitat and disturbance variables across a variegated landscape. Conservation Biology 8:521-531.
32. Moore, K. A., and S. C. Elmendorf. 2006. Propagule vs. niche limitation: untangling the mechanisms behind plant species' distributions. Ecology Letters 9:797-804.
33. Mucina, L., G. J. Bredenkamp. D. B. Hoare, and D. J. McDonald. 2000. A national vegetation database for South Africa. South African Journal of Science 96:497-498.
34. Novák, J., and M. Konvička. 2006. Proximity of valuable habitats affects succession patterns in abandoned quarries. Ecological Engineering 26:113-122.
35. Palmer. M, W. 2006, Scale dependence of native and alien species richness in North American floras. Preslia 78:427-436.
36. Prinzing, A., W. Durka, S, Klotz, and R, Brandi. 2002. Which species become aliens? Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: 385-405.
37. Pysek, P., and V. Jarošik, 2005. Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. Pages 77-96 in S. Inderjit, editor. Invasive plants: agricultural and ecological aspects. Birk-häuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
38. Pyšek, P., V. Jarošik, M. Chytrý, Z. Kropáč, L. Tichý, and J. Wild. 2005. Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats. Ecology 86:772-785.
39. Pyšek, P., V. Jarošik, and T. Kucera. 2002a. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves, Biological Conservation 104:13-24.
40. Pyšek, P., and K. Prach. 1993. Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. Journal of Biogeography 20:413-420.
41. Pyšek, P., K. Prach, and B. Mandák. 1998. Invasions of alien plants into habitats of Central European landscape: an historical pattern. Pages 23-32 in U. Starfinger, K. Edwards, I. Kowarik, and M. Williamson, editors. Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands.
42. Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, and M. Williamson. 2004. Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations. Diversity and Distributions 10:179-187.
43. Pyšek, P., J. Sádlo, and B. Mandák. 2002b. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74:97-186.
44. Rejmánek, M. 1989. Invasibility of plant communities. Pages 369-388 in J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, and M. Williamson, editors. Biological invasions. A global perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
45. Rejmánek, M., D. M. Richardson, S. I. Higgins, M. J. Pitcairn, and E. Grotkopp. 2004. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. Pages 104-161 in H. A. Mooney, J, A. McNeely, L. Neville, P. J. Schei, and J. Waage, editors. Invasive alien plants: searching for solutions. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
46. Rejmańek, M., D. M. Richardson, and P. Pyšek. 2005. Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. Pages 332-355 in E. van der Maarel, editor. Vegetation ecology. Blackwell, Maiden, UK.
47. Richardson, D. M. 2006. Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78:375-388.
48. Richardson, D. M., and P. Pyšek. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography 30:409-431.
49. Rouget, M., and D. M. Richardson. 2003. Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. American Naturalist 162:713-724.
50. Sádlo, J., M. Chytrý, and P. Pyšek. 2007. Regional species pools of vascular plants for habitats of the Czech Republic. Preslia 79:303-321.
51. Settele, J., et al. 2005. ALARM: assessing large-scale environmental risks for biodiversity with tested methods. GAIA 14: 69-72.
52. Shea, K., and P. Chesson. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:170-176.
53. Skalický, V. 1988. Regionálně fytogeografické členëní [Photographic land classification]. Pages 103-121 in S. Hejný and B. Slavík, editors. Květena České socialistické republiky [Flora of the Czech Socialist Republic]. Academia, Praha, Czech Republic.
54. Sokal, R, R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Third edition. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
55. Steinberg, G., and P. Colla. 1995. CART: tree-structured non-parametric data analysis. Salford Systems, San Diego, California, USA.
56. Stohlgren, T. J., G. W. Chong, L. D. Schell, K. A. Rimar, Y. Otsuki, M. Lee, M. A. Kalkhan, and C. A. Villa. 2002. Assessing vulnerability to invasion by nonnative plant species at multiple spatial scales. Environmental Management 29: 566-577.
57. Stohlgren, T. J., C. Jarnevich, G. W. Chong, and P. H. Evangelista. 2006, Scale and plant invasions: a theory of biotic acceptance. Preslia 78:405-426.
58. Stohlgren, T. J., L. D. Schell, and B. Vanden Heuvel. 1999. How grazing and soil quality affect native and exotic plant diversity in Rocky Mountain grasslands. Ecological Applications 9:45-64.
59. Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81-92.
60. van der Maarel, E. 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 38:97-114.
61. Vesecký, A., Š. Petrovič, V. Briedoň, and V. Karský. 1958. Atlas podnebí Českoslovcnské republiky (Climate atlas of the Czechoslovak Republic). Ústředni správa geodesie a kartog-rafie, Praha, Czech Republic.
62. Vilà, M., J. Pino, and X. Font. 2007. Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types. Journal of Vegetation Science 18:35-42.
63. Walter, J., F. Essl, T. Englisch, and M. Kiehn. 2005. Neophytes in Austria: habitat preferences and ecological effects. Neo-biota 6:13-25.
64. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
65. Wiser, S. K., P. J. Bellingham, and L. E. Burrows. 2001. Managing biodiversity information: development of New Zealand's National Vegetation Survey databank. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 25:1-17.