Susceptibility mapping of air, bone, and calcium in the head

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 2185-2194

  Buch, Sagar ^a   Liu, Saifeng ^a   Ye, Yongquan ^b   Cheng, Yu Chung Norman ^b   Neelavalli, Jaladhar ^b   Haacke, E Mark ^a,b,c  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MRI Institute for Biomedical Research   (United States)

Author keywords

air tissue interfaces; imaging bone; imaging sinuses; imaging teeth; phase imaging; quantitative susceptibility mapping

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MODELS; CALCIUM; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; ITERATIVE METHODS; MAPPING;

BACKGROUND FIELD; GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCES; ITERATIVE ALGORITHM; PHASE IMAGING; PHASE INFORMATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPS; TISSUE INTERFACE;

TISSUE;

CALCIUM;

AIR; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BONE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOMETRY; HEAD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VIVO STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHANTOM; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; PROCEDURES; SKULL;

AIR; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN MAPPING; CALCIUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SKULL;

EID: 84929652838     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25350     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng Y-CN, Reichenbach JR,. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 612-618.
2. Wu Z, Mittal S, Kish K, Yu Y, Hu J, Haacke EM,. Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a case study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 177-182.
3. Haacke EM,. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. 1st ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1999.
4. Haacke EM, Tang J, Neelavalli J, Cheng YCN,. Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32: 663-676.
5. Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Li T-Q, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH,. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 1510-1522.
6. Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al., Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2560-2568.
7. Wharton S, Bowtell R,. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods. Neuroimage. 2010; 53: 515-525.
8. Tang J, Liu S, Neelavalli J, Cheng YCN, Buch S, Haacke EM,. Improving susceptibility mapping using a threshold-based K-space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 1396-1407.
9. Neelavalli J, Cheng Y-CN, Jiang J, Haacke EM,. Removing background phase variations in susceptibility-weighted imaging using a fast, forward-field calculation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 937-948.
10. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR,. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage 2011; 54: 2789-2807.
11. Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, Spincemaille P, Liu J, Tsiouris AJ, Wang Y,. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed 2011; 24: 1129-1136.
12. Li W, Wu B, Liu C,. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage. 2011; 55: 1645-1656.
13. Lide DR,. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 87th ed. Danvers, MA: CRC Press; 2006. 2608 p.
14. Koch KM, Papademetris X, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA,. Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 6381-6402.
15. Marques JP, Bowtell R,. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng 2005; 25B: 65-78.
16. Cheng Y-CN, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM,. Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: 1169-1189.
17. Horch RA, Nyman JS, Gochberg DF, Dortch RD, Does MD,. Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 680-687.
18. De Rochefort L, Brown R, Prince MR, Wang Y,. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1003-1009.
19. Haacke EM, Petropoulos LS, Nilges EW, Wu DH,. Extraction of conductivity and permittivity using magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 1991; 36: 723.
20. Kim D-H, Choi N, Gho S-M, Shin J, Liu C,. Simultaneous imaging of in vivo conductivity and susceptibility. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 1144-1150.
21. Arevalillo-Herráez M, Gdeisat MA, Burton DR,. Hybrid robust and fast algorithm for three-dimensional phase unwrapping. Appl Opt 2009; 48: 6313-6323.
22. Wang Y, Yu Y, Li D, Bae KT, Brown JJ, Lin W, Haacke EM,. Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 661-670.
23. Hopkins JA, Wehrli FW,. Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 494-500.
24. Haacke EM, Cheng NYC, House MJ, Liu Q, Neelavalli J, Ogg RJ, Khan A, Ayaz M, Kirsch W, Obenaus A,. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 1-25.
25. Zheng W, Nichol H, Liu S, Cheng Y-CN, Haacke EM,. Measuring iron in the brain using quantitative susceptibility mapping and X-ray fluorescence imaging. Neuroimage 2013; 78: 68-74.
26. Liu S, Neelavalli J, Cheng Y-CN, Tang J, Mark Haacke E,. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of small objects using volume constraints. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 716-723.
27. Homolka P, Beer A, Birkfellner W, Nowotny R, Gahleitner A, Tschabitscher M, Bergmann H,. Bone mineral density measurement with dental quantitative CT prior to dental implant placement in cadaver mandibles: pilot study. Radiology 2002; 224: 247-252.
28. Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y,. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 196-204.
29. Sun H, Wilman AH,. Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 1151-1157.
30. Zhou D, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang Y,. Background field removal by solving the Laplacian boundary value problem. NMR Biomed 2014; 27: 312-319.
31. Liu S, Mok K, Neelavalli J, Cheng Y-CN, Tang J, Ye Y, Haacke EM,. Improved MR venography using quantitative susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 69: 1795-1804.
32. Gho SM, Liu C, Li W, Jang U, Kim EY, Hwang D, Kim DH,. Susceptibility map-weighted imaging (SMWI) for neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med 2013; 72: 337-346.