Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: Magnetic susceptibility of bone

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 494-500

  Hopkins, Jeffrey A ^a   Wehrli, Felix W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Department of Radiology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINEWIDTH; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETISM; MAMMALS;

APPARENT DENSITY; BULK MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITIES; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY MEASUREMENTS; MEASUREMENTS OF; NMR MEASUREMENTS; POWDERED SOLIDS; SUSCEPTIBILITY DIFFERENCES; SUSPENDED SOLIDS;

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

COLLAGEN; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE; CATTLE; MAGNETISM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; RIB;

EID: 0030909915     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910370404     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. F. W. Wehrli, J. C. Ford, M. Attie, H. Y. Kressel, F. S. Kaplan, Trabecular structure: preliminary application of MR interferometry. Radiology 179, 615-621 (1991).
2. S. Majumdar, Quantitative study of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: computer simulations. Magn. Reson. Mad. 22, 101-110 (1991).
3. J. C. Ford, F. W. Wehrli, In-vivo quantitative characterization of trabecular bone by NMR interferometry and localized proton spectroscopy. Magn. Rason. Mad. 17, 543-551 (1991).
4. 2* and trabecular bone density determined with a chemical shift-selective asymmetric spin-echo sequence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2, 209-219 (1992).
5. H, Chung, F. W. Wehrli, J. L. Williams, S. D. Kugelmass, Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation trabecular bone architecture and strength. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10250-10254 (1993).
6. 2′ phantom studies. Magn. Reson. Med. 31, 380-384 (1994).
7. S. N. Hwang, F. W. Wehrli, The calculation of the susceptibility-induced magnetic field from 3D images with applications to trabecular bone. J. Magn. Reson. B 109, 126 (1995).
8. F. Schick, O. Lutz, Assessment of the magnetic field distribution in yellow and red bone marrow by the MAGSUS technique. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14, 507 (1996).
9. H. Sugimoto, T. Kimura, T. Ohsawa, Susceptibility effects of bone trabeculae. Quantification in vivo using an asymmetric spin-echo technique. Invest. Radiol. 28, 208 (1993).
10. 2*-relaxationszeit zur Charakterisierung des trabekularen knochens. Fortschr. Geb. Röntgenstr. Neuen. Bildgeb. Verfahr. 161, 58-63 (1994).
11. F. W. Wehrli, J. C. Ford, J. G. Haddad, Osteoporosis: clinical assessment with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis. Radiology 196, 631-641 (1995).
12. S. Grampp, S. Majumdar, M. Jergas, D. Newitt, P. Lang, H. K. Genant, Distal radius: in vivo assessment with quantitative MR imaging, peripheral quantitative CT, and dual x-ray absorptiometry. Radiology 198, 213-218 (1996).
13. L. Mosekilde, Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure - biomechanical consequences. Bone 10, 425-432 (1989).
14. L. Mosekilde. Normal age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength - consequences of the remodeling process. Danish Med. Bull. 40, 65 (1993).
15. M. Dalstra, R. Huiskes, A. Odgaard, L. Van Erning, Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 26, 523-535 (1993).
16. S. A. Goldstein, R. Goulet, D. McGubbrey, Measurement and significance of three-dimensional architecture to the mechanical integrity of trabecular bone. Calcif. Tissue Int. 53 (Suppl. 1), S132-133 (1993).
17. R. W. Goulet, S. A. Goldstein, M. J. Ciarelli, J. L. Kuhn, M. B. Brown, L. A. Feldkamp, The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular hone. J. Biomech. 27, 375-389 (1994).
18. M. Kleerekoper, A. R. Villanueva, J. Stanciu, D. Sudhaker Rao, A. M. Parfitt, The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures. Calcif. Tissue Int. 37, 594-597 (1985).
19. R. R. Recker, Architecture and vertebral fracture. Calcif. Tissue Int. 53, (Suppl 1), S139-S142 (1993).
20. 2* in tibial specimens. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 19, 472 (1995).
21. J. C. Ford, F. W. Wehrli, H.-W. Chung, Magnetic field distribution in models of trahecular bone. Magn. Reson. Med. 30, 373-379 (1993).
22. T. S. Sumanaweera, G. H. Glover, T. O. Binford, J. R. Adler, MR susceptibility misregistration correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 12, 251 (1993).
23. D. R. Lide, in "CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics" (D. R. Lide, Ed.), p. 9, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991.
24. S. N. Hwang, F. W. Wehrli, H.-W. Chung, Experimental evaluation of theoretical field maps in human trabecular bone, in "Proc., ISMRM, 4th Annual Meeting, Now York, 1996," p. 1371.
25. H. Chung, S. Hwang, H. Young, F. Wehrli, Mapping of magnetic field distribution within cancellous bone by NMR microscopy, in "Proc., SMR, 3rd Annual Meeting, Nice, 1995" p. 1082.
26. J. F. Schenck, The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med. Phys. 23, 815-850 (1996).
27. J. Woolcock, A. Zafar, Microscale techniques for determination of magnetic susceptibility. J. Chem. Educ. 69, A176 (1992).
28. P. W. Selwood, "Magnetochemistry," Wiley Interscience Publishers, New York, 1956.
29. P. W. Selwood, in "Physical Methods of Organic Chemistry" (A. Weissberger. Ed.), vol. 1 Part IV, p. 2873, Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, 1960.
30. A. R. Kaufmann, in "Physical Methods in Chemical Analysis" (W. G. Berl, Ed.), vol. 2, p. 229, Academic Press Inc., New York, 1970.
31. B. Spencer, R. N. Zare, Magnetic susceptibility measurements using a laser-pendulum apparatus. J. Chem. Educ. 65, 277 (1988).
32. D. F. Evans, The determination of the paramagnetic susceptibility of substances in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Chem. Soc. 2003 (1959).
33. S. C.-K. Chu, Y. Xu, J. A. Balschi, C. S. J. Springer, Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn. Reson. Med. 13, 239-262 (1990).
34. D. P. Shoemaker, C. W. Garland, J. W. Nibler (eds.), in "Experiments in Physical Chemistry," pp. 430, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1989.
35. O. Beuf, A. Briguet, M. Lissac, R. Davis. Magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of magnetic susceptibility of materials. J. Magn. Reson. B 112, 111-118 (1896).
36. H. Chung, S. N. Hwang, H. N. Yeung, F. W. Wehrli, Mapping of the magnetic field distribution in cancellous bone. J. Magn. Reson. B 113, 172-176 (1996).
37. J. Glasel, K. Lee, On the interpretation of water nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation times in heterogeneous systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 970 (1974).
38. P. C. Lauterbur, B. V. Kaufman, M. K. Crawford, in "Biomolecular Structure and Function," p. 329, Academic Press. New York, 1978.
39. F. W. Wehrli, in "Encyclopedia of Magnetic Resonance" (D. M. Grant, R. K. Harris, Eds.), pp. 4803, New York, New York, 1995.
40. M. Kumar, K. G. Ojha, V. Gupta, Jn "CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics" (D. R. Lide, Ed.), p. 9, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991.
41. D. H. Live, S. I. Chan, Bulk susceptibility corrections in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments using superconducting solenoids. Anal. Chem. 42, 791 (1970).
42. R. P. Kennan, J. Zhong, C. Gore J, Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues. Magn. Reson. Med. 31, 9-21 (1994).
43. R. J. S. Brown, Distribution of fields from randomly placed dipoles: free precession signal decay as result of magnetic grains. Phys. Rev. 121, 1379 (1961).
44. S. Majumdar, D. Thomasson, A. Shimakawa, H. K. Genant, Quantitation of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: experimental studies. Magn. Reson. Med. 22, 111-127 (1991).
45. D. A. Yablonskiy, W. R. Reinus, E. M. Haacke, Effect of anisotropic relaxation on bone mineral density measurement, in Proc., ISMRM, 4th Annual Meeting, New York, 1996, p. 869.
46. "Magnetic Susceptibility Balance Operator's Manual," UK. 1995.
47. E. De Bisschop, R. Luypaert, O. Louis, M. Osteaux, Fat fraction of lumbar bone marrow usiug in vivo proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Bone 14, 133-136 (1993).
48. J. Machann, F. Schick, D. Seitz, S. H. Duda, K. Straubinger, O. Lutz, C. D. Claussen, Osteodensitometry in yellow and red bone marrow using magnetic resonance - comparison with computed tomography, in Proc., ISMRM, 4th Annual Meeting, New York, 1996, p. 1093.
49. J. E. Eastoe, in "The Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone" (G. H. Bourne, Ed.), p. 81, Academic Press Inc., New York, 1956.