Spike-coding mechanisms of cerebellar temporal processing in classical conditioning and voluntary movements

Cerebellum

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 651-658

  Yamaguchi, Kenji ^a,b   Sakurai, Yoshio ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cerebellum; Eyeblink conditioning; Purkinje cell; Simple spike; Temporal processing; Voluntary movement

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; CEREBELLUM; COGNITION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE TRACT; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; CEREBELLUM; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEURAL PATHWAYS; TIME PERCEPTION; VOLITION;

EID: 84929518821     PISSN: 14734222     EISSN: 14734230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-014-0580-5     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Buhusi CV, Meck WH. What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:755–65.
2. Mauk MD, Buonomano DV. The neural basis of temporal processing. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:307–40.
3. Delgado-García JM, Grau C, DeFeudis P, del Pozo F, Jimenez JM, Delgado JM. Ultradian rhythms in the mobility and behavior of rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 1976;25:79–91.
4. Miyamoto H, Nakamaru-Ogiso E, Hamada K, Hensch TK. Serotonergic integration of circadian clock and ultradian sleep-wake cycles. J Neurosci. 2012;32:14794–803.
5. Hinton SC, Meck WH. The ‘internal clocks’ of circadian and interval timing. Endeavour. 1997;21:82–7.
6. Thach WT, Goodkin HP, Keating JG. The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1992;15:403–42.
7. Manni E, Petrosini L. Luciani’s work on the cerebellum a century later. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:112–6.
8. Gao JH, Parsons LM, Bower JM, Xiong J, Li J, Fox PT. Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Science. 1996;272:545–7.
9. Ito M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:304–13.
10. D'Angelo E, Casali S. Seeking a unified framework for cerebellar function and dysfunction: from circuit operations to cognition. Front Neural Circuits. 2013. doi:10.3389/fncir.2012.00116.
11. Tomlinson SP, Davis NJ, Bracewell RM. Brain stimulation studies of non-motor cerebellar function: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:766–89.
12. Xu D, Liu T, Ashe J, Bushara KO. Role of the olivo–cerebellar system in timing. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5990–5.
13. Rahmati N, Owens CB, Bosman LW, Spanke JK, Lindeman S, Gong W, et al. Cerebellar potentiation and learning a whisker-based object localization task with a time response window. J Neurosci. 2014;34:1949–62.
14. Galliano E, Potters JW, Elgersma Y, Wisden W, Kushner SA, De Zeeuw CI, et al. Synaptic transmission and plasticity at inputs to murine cerebellar Purkinje cells are largely dispensable for standard nonmotor tasks. J Neurosci. 2013;33:12599–618.
15. Ivry RB, Spencer RM, Zelaznik HN, Diedrichsen J. The cerebellum and event timing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;978:302–17.
16. Spencer RM, Zelaznik HN, Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB. Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science. 2003;300:1437–9.
17. Grube M, Lee KH, Griffiths TD, Barker AT, Woodruff PW. Transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation of the human cerebellum distinguishes absolute, duration-based from relative, beat-based perception of subsecond time intervals. Front Psychol. 2010. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00171.
18. Bo J, Block HJ, Clark JE, Bastian AJ. A cerebellar deficit in sensorimotor prediction explains movement timing variability. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:2825–32.
19. Ohmae S, Uematsu A, Tanaka M. Temporally specific sensory signals for the detection of stimulus omission in the primate deep cerebellar nuclei. J Neurosci. 2013;33:15432–41.
20. Dreher JC, Grafman J. The roles of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in timing and error prediction. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16:1609–19.
21. Lewis PA, Miall RC. Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra-second intervals. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:1583–92.
22. Koch G, Oliveri M, Torriero S, Salerno S, Lo Gerfo E, Caltagirone C. Repetitive TMS of cerebellum interferes with millisecond time processing. Exp Brain Res. 2007;179:291–9.
23. Jirenhed DA, Hesslow G. Learning stimulus intervals—adaptive timing of conditioned Purkinje cell responses. Cerebellum. 2011;10:523–35.
24. Ito M. Input and output pathways in the cerebellar cortex. In: Ito M, editor. The cerebellum: brain for an implicit self. Upper Saddle Rive: FT Press Science; 2011. p. 45–51.
25. Ito M. Long-term depression. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:85–102.
26. Eccles JC, Llinás R, Sasaki K. The excitatory synaptic action of climbing fibres on the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. J Physiol. 1966;182:268–96.
27. Thach WT. Somatosensory receptive fields of single units in cat cerebellar cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1967;30:675–96.
28. Cerminara NL, Rawson JA. Evidence that climbing fibers control an intrinsic spike generator in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4510–7.
29. Wise AK, Cerminara NL, Marple-Horvat DE, Apps R. Mechanisms of synchronous activity in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol. 2010;588:2373–90.
30. Marr D. A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol. 1969;202:437–70.
31. Albus JS. A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci. 1971;10:25–61.
32. Ito M, Sakurai M, Tongroach P. Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol. 1982;324:113–34.
33. Koekkoek SKE, Hulscher HC, Dortland BR, Hensbroek RA, Elgersma Y, Ruigrok TJH, et al. Cerebellar LTD and learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. Science. 2003;301:1736–9.
34. Buonomano DV, Mauk MD. Neural network model of the cerebellum: temporal discrimination and the timing of motor responses. Neural Comput. 1994;6:38–55.
35. Medina JF, Garcia KS, Nores WL, Taylor NM, Mauk MD. Timing mechanisms in the cerebellum: testing predictions of a large-scale computer simulation. J Neurosci. 2000;20:5516–25.
36. Honda T, Yamazaki T, Tanaka S, Nagao S, Nishino T. Stimulus-dependent state transition between synchronized oscillation and randomly repetitive burst in a model cerebellar granular layer. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002087.
37. Brogden WJ, Horsley GW. Intraneural conditioning: cerebellar conditioned reflexes. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1942;48:437–55.
38. McCormick DA, Guyer PE, Thompson RF. Superior cerebellar peduncle lesions selectively abolish the ipsilateral classically conditioned nictitating membrane/eyelid response of the rabbit. Brain Res. 1982;244:347–50.
39. Clark GA, McCormick DA, Lavond DG, Thompson RF. Effects of lesions of cerebellar nuclei on conditioned behavioral and hippocampal neuronal responses. Brain Res. 1984;291:125–36.
40. Welsh JP, Harvey JA. Cerebellar lesions and the nictitating membrane reflex: performance deficits of the conditioned and unconditioned response. J Neurosci. 1989;9:299–311.
41. Yeo CH, Lobo DH, Baum A. Acquisition of a new-latency conditioned nictitating membrane response—major, but not complete, dependence on the ipsilateral cerebellum. Learn Mem. 1997;3:557–77.
42. Rogers RF, Fender AF, Steinmetz JE. The cerebellum is necessary for rabbit classical eyeblink conditioning with a non-somatosensory (photic) unconditioned stimulus. Behav Brain Res. 1999;104:105–12.
43. Attwell PJ, Cooke SF, Yeo CH. Cerebellar function in consolidation of a motor memory. Neuron. 2002;34:1011–20.
44. Bao S, Chen L, Kim JJ, Thompson RF. Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1592–7.
45. Robleto K, Thompson RF. Extinction of a classically conditioned response: red nucleus and interpositus. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2651–8.
46. McCormick DA, Thompson RF. Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. Science. 1984;223:296–9.
47. Berthier NE, Moore JW. Cerebellar Purkinje cell activity related to the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. Exp Brain Res. 1986;63:341–50.
48. Katz DB, Steinmetz JE. Single-unit evidence for eye-blink conditioning in cerebellar cortex is altered, but not eliminated, by interpositus nucleus lesions. Learn Mem. 1997;4:88–104.
49. Tracy JA, Thompson JK, Krupa DJ, Thompson RF. Evidence of plasticity in the pontocerebellar conditioned stimulus pathway during classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in the rabbit. Behav Neurosci. 1998;112:267–85.
50. Rogers RF, Britton GB, Steinmetz JE. Learning-related interpositus activity is conserved across species as studied during eyeblink conditioning in the rat. Brain Res. 2001;905:171–7.
51. Kotani S, Kawahara S, Kirino Y. Purkinje cell activity during learning a new timing in classical eyeblink conditioning. Brain Res. 2003;994:193–202.
52. Jirenhed DA, Bengtsson F, Hesslow G. Acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of a cerebellar cortical memory trace. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2493–502.
53. Rasmussen A, Jirenhed DA, Hesslow G. Simple and complex spike firing patterns in Purkinje cells during classical conditioning. Cerebellum. 2008;7:563–6.
54. Zbarska S, Bloedel JR, Bracha V. Cerebellar dysfunction explains the extinction-like abolition of conditioned eyeblinks after NBQX injections in the inferior olive. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10–20.
55. Svensson P, Jirenhed DA, Bengtsson F, Hesslow G. Effect of conditioned stimulus parameters on timing of conditioned Purkinje cell responses. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:1329–36.
56. Jirenhed DA, Hesslow G. Time course of classically conditioned Purkinje cell response is determined by initial part of conditioned stimulus. J Neurosci. 2011;31:9070–4.
57. Wetmore DZ, Jirenhed DA, Rasmussen A, Johansson F, Schnitzer MJ, Hesslow G. Bidirectional plasticity of Purkinje cells matches temporal features of learning. J Neurosci. 2014;34:1731–7.
58. Domingo JA, Gruart A, Delgado-García JM. Quantal organization of reflex and conditioned eyelid responses. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78:2518–30.
59. Trigo JA, Gruart A, Delgado-García JM. Discharge profiles of abducens, accessory abducens, and orbicularis oculi motoneurons during reflex and conditioned blinks in alert cats. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81:1666–84.
60. Sánchez-Campusano R, Gruart A, Delgado-García JM. The cerebellar interpositus nucleus and the dynamic control of learned motor responses. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6620–32.
61. Sánchez-Campusano R, Gruart A, Delgado-García JM. Dynamic associations in the cerebellar-motoneuron network during motor learning. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10750–63.
62. Gao Z, van Beugen BJ, De Zeeuw CI. Distributed synergistic plasticity and cerebellar learning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:619–35.
63. Ito M. Voluntary motor control. In: Ito M, editor. The cerebellum: brain for an implicit self. Upper Saddle River: FT Press Science; 2011. p. 150–8.
64. Welsh JP, Lang EJ, Suglhara I, Llinás R. Dynamic organization of motor control within the olivocerebellar system. Nature. 1995;374:453–7.
65. Kitazawa S, Kimura T, Yin PB. Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements. Nature. 1998;392:494–7.
66. Witter L, Canto CB, Hoogland TM, de Gruijl JR, De Zeeuw CI. Strength and timing of motor responses mediated by rebound firing in the cerebellar nuclei after Purkinje cell activation. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:133.
67. Chaumont J, Guyon N, Valera AM, Dugué GP, Popa D, Marcaggi P, et al. Clusters of cerebellar Purkinje cells control their afferent climbing fiber discharge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:16223–8.
68. De Zeeuw CI, Hoebeek FE, Bosman LW, Schonewille M, Witter L, Koekkoek SK. Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the cerebellum. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:327–44.
69. Yamaguchi K, Sakurai Y. Novel behavioral tasks to explore cerebellar temporal processing in milliseconds in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2014;263:138–43.
70. Yamaguchi K, Takahashi S, Sakurai Y. “Cerebellar Purkinje-cell spikes interaction during a timing behavior task in the rat.” In: 42th Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, New Orleans; 2012. Program No. 809.12.
71. Shin SL, Hoebeek FE, Schonewille M, De Zeeuw CI, Aertsen A, De Schutter E. Regular patterns in cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike trains. PLoS One. 2007;2:e485.
72. Shin SL, De Schutter E. Dynamic synchronization of Purkinje cell simple spikes. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:3485–91.
73. De Schutter E, Steuber V. Patterns and pauses in Purkinje cell simple spike trains: experiments, modeling and theory. Neuroscience. 2009;162:816–26.
74. Cao Y, Maran SK, Dhamala M, Jaeger D, Heck DH. Behavior-related pauses in simple-spike activity of mouse Purkinje cells are linked to spike rate modulation. J Neurosci. 2012;32:8678–85.