Research and policy perspectives on data- based decision making in education

Teachers College Record

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1-10

  Orland, Martin ^a  

^a WestEd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929404283     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anagnostopoulos, D., & Bali, V.A. (2011). Implementing statewide longitudinal student data systems: Lessons from the states. East Lansing: Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.
2. Bocala, C., & Boudett, K. P. (2015). Teaching educators habits of mind for using data wisely. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
3. Center for Assessment. (2013). Using baseline data and information to set SLO targets: A part of the SLO toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.nciea.org/wp-content/uploads/7_Using-Baseline-Data-and-Information_7.15.13.pdf
4. The Center for Education Reform. (2013). America's attitudes towards education reform public support for accountability in schools. Retrieved from http://www.edreform.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/12/CER-Accountability-Poll-Results2.pdf
5. Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS. (2012). Coming together to raise achievement: New assessments for the Common Core State Standards. Retrieved from http://www.k12center.org/rsc/pdf/Coming_Together_April_2012_Final.PDF
6. Center on Education Policy. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Data Quality Campaign. (2011). From compliance to service: Evolving the state role to support district data efforts to improve student achievement. Retrieved from http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/1455_From%20Compliance%20to%20Service.pdf
8. Data Quality Campaign. (2013). Data for action. Retrieved from http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/DataForAction2013.pdf
9. Data Quality Campaign. (2014). Teacher data literacy: It's about time. Retrieved from http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/DQC-Data%20Literacy%20Brief.pdf
10. Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2015). Teachers' use of assessment data to inform instruction: Lessons from the past and prospects for the future. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
11. Doherty, K. M., & Jacobs, S. (2013). Connect the dots: Using evaluations of teacher effectiveness to inform policy and practice. National Council on Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/State_of_the_States_2013_Using_Teacher_Evaluations_NCTQ_Report
12. Education Sciences Reform Act, 20 U.S.C. § 9501 et seq. (2002). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/rschstat/leg/PL107-279.pdf
13. Farley-Ripple, E. N., & Buttram, J. (2015). The development of capacity for data use: The role of teacher networks in an elementary school. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
14. Gerzon, N. (2015). Structuring professional learning to develop a culture of data use: Aligning knowledge from the field and research findings. 117(4).
15. Gummer, E. S., & Mandinach, E. B. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
16. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., & Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice:guides/dddm_pg_092909.pdf
17. Howe, K. R. (2009). Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Educational Researcher, 38(6), 428-440. doi:10.3102/0013189X09342003
18. Hull, J. (2013). Trends in teacher evaluation: How states are measuring teacher performance. Center for Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Evaluating-performance/Trends-in-Teacher-Evaluation-At-A-Glance/Trends-in-Teacher-Evaluation-Full-Report-PDF.pdf
19. Jimerson, J. B., & Wayman, J. C. (2015). Professional Learning for Using Data: Examining Teacher Needs & Supports. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
20. Johnson, R.B. (2009). Comments on Howe: Toward a more inclusive "scientific research in education." Educational Researcher, 38(6), 449-457. doi:0.3102/0013189X09344429
21. Lachlan-Haché, L., Cushing, E., & Bivona, L. (2012). Student learning objectives as measures of educator effectiveness: The basics. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
22. Lacireno-Paquet, N., Morgan, C., & Mello, D. (2014). How states use student learning objectives in teacher evaluation systems: a review of state websites (REL 2014-013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
23. Mandinach, E. B., Friedman, J. M., & Gummer, E. S. (2015). How can schools of education help to build educators' capacity to use data? A systemic view of the issue. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
24. Marsh, J. A., Bertrand, M., & Huguet, A. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice: The mediating role of coaches and professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
25. McDonnell, L. M. (2013). Educational accountability and policy feedback. Educational Policy, 27(2), 170-189. doi:10.1177/0895904812465119
26. McDonnell, L. M., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1982). The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Title IV consolidation. Southern Review of Public Administration, 5(4), 437-458.
27. Mead, S. (2012). Recent state action on teacher effectiveness: What's in state laws and regulations? Bellwether Education Partners. Retrieved from http://bellwethereducation.org/sites/default/files/RSA-Teacher-Effectiveness.pdf
28. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2013). Grade 12 state program. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/about/schools/Grade12_StateProgramFactSheet.pdf
29. National Education Goals Panel. (1999). National education goals: Lessons learned, challenges ahead. Retrieved from http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/negp/reports/negp31.pdf
30. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
31. National Research Council. (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
32. Orland, M., & Anderson, J. (2013). Assessment for learning: What policymakers should know about formative assessment. Washington, DC: WestEd.
33. Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). Is the National Research Council Committee's report on scientific research in education scientific? On trusting the manifesto. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 62-78. doi:10.1177/1077800403259493
34. Race to the Top Fund. (2009, November 18). Federal Register, 74(221), 59688-59834.
35. Race to the Top Fund Assessment Program. (2010, April 9). Federal Register, 75(68), 18171-18185.
36. Sambolt, M., & Blumenthal, D. (2013). Promoting college and career readiness: A pocket guide for state and district leaders. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
37. Schildkamp, K., & Poortman, C. (2015). Factors influencing the functioning of data teams. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
38. Strengthening Education through Research Act of 2014, H.R. 4366, 113th Cong. (2014). Retrieved from https://beta.congress.gov/113/bills/hr4366/BILLS-113hr4366rfs.pdf
39. United States Department of Education. (2012). ESEA flexibility. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-flexibility/index.html
40. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (2009). Address to joint session of congress, February 24, 2009 [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Fact-Sheet-Expanding-the-Promise-of-Education-in-America/