Teaching educators habits of mind for using data wisely

Teachers College Record

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1-20

  Bocala, Candice ^a   Boudet, Kathryn Parker ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929403785     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, methods and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Boudett, K. P., & City, E. A. (2013). Lessons from the Data Wise Project: Three habits of mind for building a collaborative culture. Harvard Education Letter, 29(3), 1-2. Retrieved from http://hepg.org/hel/article/567
3. Boudett, K. P., & City, E. A. (2014). Meeting wise: Making the most of collaborative time for educators. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
4. Boudett. K. P., City, E. A., & Murnane, R. J. (Eds.). (2013). Data Wise, revised and expanded edition: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
5. City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6. Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement, 9, 173-206.
7. Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2012). The practice of data use: An introduction. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 99-111.
8. Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.). (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characteristics for success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1999), 350-383.
10. Edmondson, A. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13(2), 128-146.
11. Gallimore, R., Ermeling, B., Saunders, W., & Goldenberg, C. (2009). Moving the learning of teaching closer to practice: Teacher education implications of school-based inquiry teams. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 537-553.
12. Goertz, M., Oláh, L., & Riggan, M. (2009, December). Can interim assessments by used for instructional change? (CPRE Policy Briefs RB-51). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
13. Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2012). What teacher preparation programs teach about K-12 assessment: A review. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/assessment_report.pdf
14. Hackman, R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., & Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
16. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how would we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
17. Jennings, J. L. (2012). The effects of accountability system design on teachers' use of test score data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1-23.
18. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2003). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high performance organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Kekahio, W., & Baker, M. (2013). Five steps for structuring data-informed conversations and action in education (REL 2013-001). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Pacific. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
20. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 193-212.
21. Koretz, D. (2009). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010) How the structure and focus of teachers' collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 389-398.
24. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325-340.
25. Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
26. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 917-946.
27. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
28. Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & DiRanna, K. (2008). The data coach's guide to improving learning for all students: Unleashing the power of collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
29. Mandinach, E. B., Friedman, J. M., & Gummer, E. S. (2015). How can schools of education help to build educators' capacity to use data? A systemic view of the issue. Teachers College Record, 117(4).
30. Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). Defining data literacy: A report on a convening of experts. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 13(2), 6-28.
31. Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators' use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1-48.
32. McDonald, J. P., Mohr, N., Dichter, A., & McDonald, E. C. (2007). The power of protocols (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33. McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. E. (2002). Reforming districts: How districts support school reform. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
34. Means, B., Chen, E., DeBarger, A., & Padilla, C. (2011). Teachers' ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
35. Means, B., Padilla, C., & Gallagher, L. (2010). Use of education data at the local level: From accountability to instructional improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
36. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2012). Forum guide to taking action with education data (NFES 2013-801). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
37. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
38. Nelson, T., & Slavit, D. (2008). Supported teacher collaborative inquiry. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 99-116.
39. Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009): Co-constructing distributed leadership: district and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School Leadership & Management, 29(5), 477-494.
40. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
42. Saunders, W. M., Goldenberg, C. N., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of Title I Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1006-1033.
43. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A Fifth Discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Crown Business.
44. Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59.
45. Supovitz, J. (2012). Getting at student understanding-The key to teachers' use of test data. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1-29.
46. Supovitz, J., Foley, E., & Mishook, J. (2012) In search of leading indicators in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(19) Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/952
47. Talbert, J. E., Mileva, L., Chen, P., Cor, M. K., & McLaughlin, M. (2010). Developing school capacity for inquirybased improvement: Progress, challenges, and resources. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Teaching.
48. Troen, V., & Boles, K. C. (2012). The power of teacher teams: With cases, analyses, and strategies for success. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin.
49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Wayman , J. C., Jimerson, J. B., & Cho, V. (2012). Organizational considerations in establishing the Data-Informed District. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 23(2), 159-178.
51. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
52. Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(19), 1-40.