Assessment of vessel permeability by combining dynamic contrast-enhanced and arterial spin labeling MRI

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 642-649

  Liu, Ho Ling ^a,b   Chang, Ting Ting ^a   Yan, Feng Xian ^a,c   Li, Cheng He ^a   Lin, Yu Shi ^a   Wong, Alex M ^a,d  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Arterial spin labeling (ASL); Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE); Forward volumetric transfer constant (Ktrans); MRI; Permeability

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; BRAIN; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SCANNING; TISSUE; TUMORS;

ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; CONTINUOUS ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRIS (DCE); GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCES; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; THREEDIMENSIONAL (3-D); TRANSFER CONSTANT;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PERMEABILITY; BRAIN TUMOR; CHILD; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFANT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MICROVASCULARIZATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SCINTIGRAPHY; SIMULATION; SPIN LABELING; THEORY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN ARTERY; BRAIN CIRCULATION; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; SPIN LABELING;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BLOOD VOLUME DETERMINATION; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIN LABELS;

EID: 84929290365     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3297     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Brasch RC, Dillon WP. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000; 21: 891-899.
2. Law M, Yang S, Babb JS, Knopp EA, Golfinos JG, Zagzag D, Johnson G. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 746-755.
3. Mills SJ, Patankar TA, Haroon HA, Balériaux D, Swindell R, Jackson A. Do cerebral blood volume and contrast transfer coefficient predict prognosis in human glioma? Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006; 27: 853-858.
4. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1997; 7: 91-101.
5. Zhang S, Olthoff A, Frahm J. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of normal swallowing. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 35: 1372-1379.
6. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HB, Lee TY, Mayr NA, Parker GJ, Port RE, Taylor J, Weisskoff RM. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999; 10: 223-232.
7. Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011; 66: 735-745.
8. St Lawrence KS, Lee TY. An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain: I. Theoretical derivation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1998; 18: 1365-1377.
9. Brix G, Kiessling F, Lucht R, Darai S, Wasser K, Delorme S, Griebel J. Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004; 52: 420-429.
10. Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Perfusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992; 23: 37-45.
11. Chalela JA, Alsop DC, Gonzalez-Atavales JB, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE, Detre JA. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000; 31: 680-687.
12. Wolf RL, Alsop DC, Levy-Reis I, Meyer PT, Maldjian JA, Gonzalez-Atavales J, French JA, Alavi A, Detre JA. Detection of mesial temporal lobe hypoperfusion in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy by use of arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2001; 22: 1334-1341.
13. Warmuth C, Günther M, Zimmer C. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 228: 523-532.
14. Dai W, Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008; 60: 1488-1497.
15. Järnum H, Steffensen EG, Knutsson L, Fründ ET, Simonsen CW, Lundbye-Christensen S, Shankaranarayanan A, Alsop DC, Jensen FT, Larsson EM. Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 307-317.
16. Wong AM, Yan FX, Liu HL. Comparison of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging with gradient-echo and spin-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013; 39: 427-433.
17. Renkin EM. Transport of potassium-42 from blood to tissue in isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. Am. J. Physiol. 1959; 197: 1205-1210.
18. Roy B, Awasthi R, Bindal A, Sahoo P, Kumar R, Behari S, Ojha BK, Husain N, Pandey CM, Rathore RK, Gupta RK. Comparative evaluation of 3-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in grading of human glioma. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2013; 37: 321-326.
19. Henderson E, Sykes J, Drost D, Weinmann HJ, Rutt BK, Lee TY. Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000; 12: 991-1003.
20. Larsson HB, Courivaud F, Rostrup E, Hansen AE. Measurement of brain perfusion, blood volume, and blood-brain barrier permeability, using dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI at 3 tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 62: 1270-1281.
21. Jain R, Ellika SK, Scarpace L, Schultz LR, Rock JP, Gutierrez J, Patel SC, Ewing J, Mikkelsen T. Quantitative estimation of permeability surface-area product in astroglial brain tumors using perfusion CT and correlation with histopathologic grade. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008; 29: 694-700.
22. Narang J, Jain R, Scarpace L, Saksena S, Schultz LR, Rock JP, Rosenblum M, Patel SC, Mikkelsen T. Tumor vascular leakiness and blood volume estimates in oligodendrogliomas using perfusion CT: an analysis of perfusion parameters helping further characterize genetic subtypes as well as differentiate from astroglial tumors. J. Neurooncol 2011; 102: 287-293.
23. Buckley DL, Roberts C, Parker GJ, Logue JP, Hutchinson CE. Prostate cancer: evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging--initial experience. Radiology 2004; 233: 709-715.
24. Naish JH, Kershaw LE, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Waterton JC, Parker GJ. Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 61: 1507-1514.
25. Donaldson SB, West CM, Davidson SE, Carrington BM, Hutchison G, Jones AP, Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 63: 691-700.
26. Kershaw LE, Cheng HL. Temporal resolution and SNR requirements for accurate DCE-MRI data analysis using the AATH model. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 64: 1772-1780.
27. Brooks DJ, Beaney RP, Lammertsma AA, Leenders KL, Horlock PL, Kensett MJ, Marshall J, Thomas DG, Jones T. Quantitative measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability using rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1984; 4: 535-545.
28. Parker GJM, Buckley DL. Tracer kinetic modeling for T1-weighted DCE-MRI. In: Jackson A, Buckley DL, Parker GJM, editors. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology. Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 2005, pp. 81-92.
29. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee TY. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1998; 16: 1057-1073.
30. Robers TP. Physiologic measurements by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: expectations and limitations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1997; 7: 82-90.
31. Wu WC, Fernández-Seara M, Detre JA, Wehrli FW, Wang J. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tagging efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007; 58: 1020-1027.
32. Alsop DC, Detre JA. Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16: 1236-1249.
33. St Lawrence KS, Wang J. Effects of the apparent transverse relaxation time on cerebral blood flow measurements obtained by arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005; 53: 425-433.
34. Ding B, Ling HW, Chen KM, Jiang H, Zhu YB. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and permeability in preoperative grading of intracranial glioma using CT perfusion imaging. Neuroradiology 2006; 48: 773-781.
35. Jain R, Ellika S, Lehman NL, Scarpace L, Schultz LR, Rock JP, Rosenblum M, Mikkelsen T. Can permeability measurements add to blood volume measurements in differentiating tumefactive demyelinating lesions from high grade gliomas using perfusion CT? J. Neurooncol 2010; 97: 383-388.
36. Heye AK, Culling RD, Valdés Hernández MD, Thrippleton MJ, Wardlaw JM. Assessment of blood-brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review. Neuroimage Clin. 2014; 6: 262-274.
37. 1-weighted MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 47: 601-606.
38. Schabel MC. A unified impulse response model for DCE-MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012; 68: 1632-1646.