Temporal resolution and SNR requirements for accurate DCE-MRI data analysis using the AATH model

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1772-1780

  Kershaw, Lucy E ^a   Cheng, Hai Ling Margaret ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

AATH model; accuracy; arterial input function (AIF); blood flow; DCE MRI; temporal resolution

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; ERRORS; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TISSUE;

ACCURACY; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; BLOOD FLOW; DCE-MRI; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

TRACER;

ACCURACY; ADIABATICITY; ARTERY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL OBTURATOR MUSCLE; MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE TUMOR; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TIME;

EID: 78649570019     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22573     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. O'Connor JP, Jackson A, Parker GJ, Jayson GC,. DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents. Br J Cancer 2007; 96: 189-195.
2. Buckley DL, Shurrab AE, Cheung CM, Jones AP, Mamtora H, Kalra PA,. Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of two models in human subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 1117-1123.
3. Dyke JP, Panicek DM, Healey JH, Meyers PA, Huvos AG, Schwartz LH, Thaler HT, Tofts PS, Gorlick R, Koutcher JA, Ballon D,. Osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas: estimation of necrotic fraction during induction chemotherapy with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 228: 271-278.
4. Tofts PS, Berkowitz B, Schnall MD,. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 564-568.
5. Roberts C, Parker GJ, Rose CJ, Watson Y, O'Connor JP, Stivaros SM, Jackson A, Rushton VE,. Glandular function in Sjogren syndrome: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and tracer kinetic modeling-initial experience. Radiology 2008; 246: 845-853.
6. Hodgson RJ, Connolly S, Barnes T, Eyes B, Campbell RS, Moots R,. Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the hand and wrist in rheumatoid arthritis and the response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 482-489.
7. de Lussanet QG, Backes WH, Griffioen AW, Padhani AR, Baeten CI, van Baardwijk A, Lambin P, Beets GL, van Engelshoven JM, Beets-Tan RG,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of radiation therapy-induced microcirculation changes in rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: 1309-1315.
8. Kershaw LE, Logue JP, Hutchinson CE, Clarke NW, Buckley DL,. Late tissue effects following radiotherapy and neoadjuvant hormone therapy of the prostate measured with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 127-134.
9. Evelhoch JL,. Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 254-259.
10. Galbraith SM, Lodge MA, Taylor NJ, Rustin GJ, Bentzen S, Stirling JJ, Padhani AR,. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 132-142.
11. Kety SS,. The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues. Pharmacol Rev 1951; 3: 1-41.
12. Tofts PS,. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 91-101.
13. Henderson E, Milosevic MF, Haider MA, Yeung IW,. Functional CT imaging of prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: 3085-3100.
14. Johnson JA, Wilson TA,. A model for capillary exchange. Am J Physiol 1966; 210: 1299-1303.
15. St Lawrence KS, Lee TY,. An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain. I. Theoretical derivation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18: 1365-1377.
16. Sourbron SP, Michaely HJ, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO,. MRI-measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 40-48.
17. Donaldson SB, West CM, Davidson SE, Carrington BM, Hutchison G, Jones AP, Sourbron SP, Buckley DL,. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 691-700.
18. Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi GA, Cheung S, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K, Jayson GC,. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 993-1000.
19. Cheng HL,. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1073-1078.
20. Roberts C, Issa B, Stone A, Jackson A, Waterton JC, Parker GJ,. Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 554-563.
21. Buckley DL,. Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 601-606.
22. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee TY,. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 1057-1073.
23. Kershaw LE, Buckley DL,. Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T(1)-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 986-992.
24. Jeukens CR, van den Berg CA, Donker R, van Vulpen M, Bakker CJ, van Leeuwen MS, van der Heide UA,. Feasibility and measurement precision of 3D quantitative blood flow mapping of the prostate using dynamic contrast-enhanced multi-slice CT. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 4329-4343.
25. Koh TS, Zeman V, Darko J, Lee TY, Milosevic MF, Haider M, Warde P, Yeung IW,. The inclusion of capillary distribution in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity model of blood flow. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46: 1519-1538.
26. Purdie TG, Henderson E, Lee TY,. Functional CT imaging of angiogenesis in rabbit VX2 soft-tissue tumour. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46: 3161-3175.
27. Kershaw LE, Hutchinson CE, Buckley DL,. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Evaluation of T(1), T(2), and microvascular characteristics with T(1)-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 641-648.
28. Koh TS, Cheong LH, Hou Z, Soh YC,. A physiologic model of capillary-tissue exchange for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of tumor microcirculation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50: 159-167.
29. Brookes JA, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, Murray AD, Staff RT,. Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using two- and three-dimensional variable flip angle fast low-angle shot. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 163-171.
30. Naish JH, Kershaw LE, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Waterton JC, Parker GJ. Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T(1)-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 1507-1514.
31. Henderson E, Sykes J, Drost D, Weinmann HJ, Rutt BK, Lee TY,. Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 991-1003.
32. Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA, Wright MH,. Users' guide for NPSOL (Version 4.0): a Fortran package for nonlinear programming. Stanford University, Stanford: Department of Operations Research; 1986.
33. Cheng HL,. Improved correlation to quantitative DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters using a modified initial area under the uptake curve (mIAUC) approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 864-872.
34. Cheng HL,. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 736-743.
35. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A,. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 466-473.