The dialogic space offered by curriculum-making in the process of learning to teach, and the creation of a progressive knowledge-led curriculum

Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 210-224

  Lambert, David ^a   Biddulph, Mary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

curriculum futures; curriculum making; learning; subject disciplines; young people

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929028472     PISSN: 1359866X     EISSN: 14692945     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2014.934197     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abrams, F. (2012, October 16). The future is common knowledge. Guardian, p. 30.
2. Aitken, P. (2001). Global crises of childhood: Rights, justice and the unchildlike child. Area, 33(2), 119–127. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00015
3. Bakhurst, D. (2011). The formation of reason. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
4. Bednarz, S. W., Heffron, S., & Huynh, N. T. (Eds.). (2013). A road map for 21st century geography education: Geography education research (A report from the Geography Education research Committee of the Road Map for 22st century Geography Education Project). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers. Retrieved from http://natgeoed.org/roadmap
5. Biddulph, M. (2011). Young people’s geographies: Implications for school geography. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 43–66). London: Continuum.
6. Biddulph, M. (2013). Where is the curriculum created? In D. Lambert & M. Jones (Eds.), Debates in geography education (pp. 129–142). London: Routledge.
7. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
8. Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology and Practice, 6(2), 35–49.
9. Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). Comment on bill Boyle’s blog: ‘The importance of teaching: Learnification part 2’. Educarenow. Retrieved from http://educarenow.wordpress.com/2013/03/09/the-importance-of-the-teacher-learnification-part-2/
10. Bonnett, A. (2012). Challenging assumptions: Geography – What’s the big idea? Geography, 97(1), 39–41.
11. Brooker, R., & Macdonald, D. (1999). Did we hear you? Issues of student voice in a curriculum innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 83–97. doi:10.1080/002202799183313
12. Brooks, C. (2010). Why geography teachers’ subject expertise matters. Geography, 95(3), 143–148.
13. Catling, S., & Martin, F. (2011). Contesting powerful knowledge: The primary geography curriculum as an articulation between academic and children’s (ethno-) geographies. Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 317–335. doi:10.1080/09585176.2011.601624
14. Derry, J. (2007). What is it to be a human knower? Philosophy Now, 11. Retrieved from http://philosophynow.org/issues/63/What_is_it_to_be_a_Human_Knower
15. DfE. (2010). The importance of teaching: Schools white paper. London: The Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationdetail/page1/CM%207980
16. Dorling, D. (2011). Injustice: Why social inequality persists. Bristol: The Policy Press.
17. Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. London: Routledge.
18. Evans, B. (2008). Geographies of youth/young people. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1659–1680. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00147.x
19. Firth, R. (2011). Making geography visible as an object of study in the secondary school curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 22(3), 289–316. doi:10.1080/09585176.2011.601209
20. Firth, R. (2012). Disordering the coalition government’s “new” approach to curriculum design and knowledge: The matter of the discipline. Geography, 97(2), 86–94.
21. Firth, R., & Biddulph, M. (2009). Whose life is it anyway? In D. Mitchell (Ed.), Living geography. Cambridge: Chris Kington.
22. Furedi, F. (2009). Wasted; why education is not educating. London: Continuum.
23. GA. (2008). The Young People’s Geographies project. Retrieved from http://www.youngpeoplesgeographies.co.uk
24. GA. (2011). Curriculum making explained. Retrieved from http://www.geography.org.uk/cpdevents/curriculummaking/curriculummakingexplained/
25. Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship (Innocenti Essays No. 4). Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.
26. Hart, T. (2001). From information to transformation: Education for the evolution of consciousness. In J. L. Kincheloe & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Counterpoints: Studies in the post modern theory of education (Vol. 162). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
27. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
28. Heffron, S. G., & Downs, R. M. (Eds.). (2012). Geography for life: National geography standards (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Council for Geographic Education.
29. Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). London: Sage.
30. Kirk, G., & Broadbent, P. (2006). Every child matters and teacher education: Towards a UCET position paper. London: Universities Council for the Education of Teachers.
31. Lambert, D. (2011). Reviewing the case for geography, and the knowledge turn in the English national curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 243–264. doi:10.1080/09585176.2011.574991
32. Lambert, D. (2013). Geography in school and a curriculum of survival. Theory and Research in Education, 11(1), 85–98. doi:10.1177/1477878512468385
33. Lambert, D., & Hopkin, J. (2014). A possibilist analysis of the geography national curriculum in England. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(1), 64–78. doi:10.1080/10382046.2013.858446
34. Lambert, D., & Morgan, J. (2010). Teaching geography 11–18: A conceptual approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
35. Leat, D., Ulrike, T., & Reid, A. (2012). The epistemological fog in realising learning to learn in European curriculum policies. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 400–412. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.400
36. Moore, A. (2000). Teaching and learning: Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. London: Routledge.
37. Morgan, J., & Lambert, D. (2005). Geography: Teaching school subjects. Oxford: Routledge.
38. Oates, T. (2010). Could do better: Using international comparisons to refine the national curriculum in England. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment.
39. Ofsted. (2011). Learning to make a world of difference. Retrieved from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/geography-learning-make-world-of-difference
40. Pring, R. (2013). The life and death of secondary education for all. Abingdon: Routledge.
41. Rata, E. (2010). Editorial. The Journal of the Pacific Circle Consortium for Education, 22(1), 5–7.
42. Reiss, M., & White, J. (2013). An aims based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing. London: IOE Press.
43. Roberts, M. (2003). Learning through enquiry. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
44. Roberts, M. (2013). Geography through enquiry. Sheffield: Geographical Association.
45. Ryan, P. (2008). How new is the “new” social study of childhood? The myth of a paradigm shift. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, XXXVIII(4), 553–576. doi:10.1162/jinh.2008.38.4.553
46. Santoro, N., Reid, J.-A., Mayer, D., & Singh, M. (2012). Producing quality teachers: The role of teacher professional standards. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.644508
47. Siegel, H. (2012). Education as initiation into the space of reasons. Theory and Research in Education, 10(2), 191–202. doi:10.1177/1477878512446542
48. Skelton, T., & Valentine, G. (Eds.). (1998). Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures. London: Routledge.
49. Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum theory and practice. The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved from www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm
50. Standish, A. (2007). Geography used to be about maps. In R. Whelan (Ed.), The corruption of the curriculum. London: Civitas.
51. Standish, A. (2012). The false promise of global learning. London: Continuum.
52. Thomson, P., & Hall, C. (2008). Opportunities missed and/or thwarted? “Funds of knowledge” meet the English national curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 19(2), 87–103. doi:10.1080/09585170802079488
53. White, J. (2007). What are schools for, and why? (Impact, 14). Salisbury: The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
54. Williamson, B. (2008). Student voice and the marketisation of school reform. In Paper presented at Institute of Education seminar, February 4, 2008. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
55. Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12006
56. Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Oxford: Routledge.
57. Young, M. (2009). What are schools for? In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Knowledge, values and educational policy. London: Routledge.
58. Young, M. (2010). The future of education in a knowledge society: The radical case for a subject-based curriculum. The Journal of the Pacific Circle Consortium for Education, 22(1), 21–32.
59. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01413.x