Retraction notice to “Personality and morphology shape task participation, collective foraging and escape behaviour in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola” [Animal Behaviour, 105 (2015), 47–54, (S0003347215001384), (10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.001)];Personality and morphology shape task participation, collective foraging and escape behaviour in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 105, Issue , 2015, Pages 47-54

  Wright, Colin M ^a   Keiser, Carl N ^a   Pruitt, Jonathan N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal personality; Behavioral syndromes; Collective behavior; Division of labor; Social facilitation; Task allocation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BODY SIZE; COLLECTIVE ACTION; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; FACILITATION; FIELD METHOD; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GROUP SIZE; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; LABOR DIVISION; LABORATORY METHOD; MORPHOLOGY; SHAPE; SPIDER;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; STEGODYPHUS DUMICOLA;

EID: 84929012656     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2023.09.004     Document Type: Erratum

References (65)

1. Ainsworth C., Slotow R., Crouch T., Lubin Y. Lack of task differentiation during prey capture in the group living spider Stegodyphus mimosarum (Araneae, Eresidae). Journal of Arachnology 2002, 30:39-46.
2. Amir N., Whitehouse M.E.A., Lubin Y. Food consumption rates and competition in a communally feeding social spider, Stegodyphus dumicola (Eresidae). Journal of Arachnology 2000, 28:195-200.
3. Aplin L.M., Farine D.R., Mann R.P., Sheldon B.C. Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2014, 281. Advance online publication. 10.1098/rspb.2014.1016.
4. Arnold W. Social thermoregulation during hibernation in alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). Journal of Comparative Physiology B Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology 1988, 158:151-156.
5. Aviles L. Sex-ratio bias and possible group selection in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. American Naturalist 1986, 128:1-12.
6. Aviles L. Interdemic selection and the sex-ratio: a social spider perspective. American Naturalist 1993, 142:320-345.
7. Aviles L., Varas C., Dyreson E. Does the African social spider Stegodyphus dumicola control the sex of individual offspring?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1999, 46:237-243.
8. Bilde T., Coates K.S., Birkhofer K., Bird T., Maklakov A.A., Lubin Y., et al. Survival benefits select for group living in a social spider despite reproductive costs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2007, 20:2412-2426.
9. Burns J.G., Dyer A.G. Diversity of speed-accuracy strategies benefits social insects. Current Biology 2008, 18:R953-R954.
10. Duarte A., Weissing F.J., Pen I., Keller L. An evolutionary perspective on self-organized division of labor in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2011, 42:91-110.
11. Dyer J.R.G., Croft D.P., Morrell L.J., Krause J. Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy. Behavioral Ecology 2009, 20:165-171.
12. Ebert D. Behavioral asymmetry in relation to body weight and hunger in the tropical social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae). Journal of Arachnology 1998, 26:70-80.
13. Farine D.R., Aplin L.M., Garroway C.J., Mann R.P., Sheldon B.C. Collective decision making and social interaction rules in mixed-species flocks of songbirds. Animal Behaviour 2014, 95:173-182.
14. Grinsted L., Pruitt J.N., Settepani V., Bilde T. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2013, 280:20131407. 10.1098/rspb.2013.1407.
15. Guevara J., Aviles L. Influence of body size and level of cooperation on the prey capture efficiency of two sympatric social spiders exhibiting an included niche pattern. Functional Ecology 2011, 25:859-867.
16. Guevara J., Gonzaga M.O., Vasconcellos-Neto J., Aviles L. Sociality and resource use: insights from a community of social spiders in Brazil. Behavioral Ecology 2011, 22:630-638.
17. Harcourt J.L., Ang T.Z., Sweetman G., Johnstone R.A., Manica A. Social feedback and the emergence of leaders and followers. Current Biology 2009, 19:248-252.
18. Harwood G., Aviles L. Differences in group size and the extent of individual participation in group hunting may contribute to differential prey-size use among social spiders. Biology Letters 2013, 9:20130621.
19. Henschel J.R. Predation on social and solitary individuals of the spider Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae, Erasidae). Journal of Arachnology 1998, 26:61-69.
20. Henschel J.R., Lubin Y.D., Schneider J. Sexual competition in an inbreeding social spider, Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae, Erasidae). Insectes Sociaux 1995, 42:419-426.
21. Holbrook C.T., Wright C.M., Pruitt J.N. Individual variation in personality and behavioural plasticity facilitates division of labour in social spider colonies. Animal Behaviour 2014, 97:177-183.
22. Holldobler B., Wilson E.O. The ants 1990, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Hui A., Pinter-Wollman N. Individual variation in exploratory behaviour improves speed and accuracy of collective nest selection by Argentine ants. Animal Behaviour 2014, 93:261-266.
24. Jakob E.M., Marshall S.D., Uetz G.W. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 1996, 77:61-67.
25. Jandt J.M., Bengston S., Pinter-Wollman N., Pruitt J.N., Raine N.E., Dornhaus A., et al. Behavioral syndromes and social insects: multiple levels of personality. Biological Reviews 2014, 89:48-67.
26. Jandt J.M., Dornhaus A. Bumblebee response thresholds and body size: does worker diversity increase colony performance?. Animal Behaviour 2014, 87:97-106.
27. Jeanne R.L. The organization of work in Polybia occidentalis: costs and benefits of specialization in a social wasp. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1986, 19:333-341.
28. Jeanson R., Fewell J.H., Gorelick R., Bertram S.M. Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2007, 62:289-298.
29. Johannesen J., Lubin Y., Smith D.R., Bilde T., Schneider J.M. The age and evolution of sociality in Stegodyphus spiders: a molecular phylogenetic perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2007, 274:231-237.
30. Keiser C.N., Jones D.K., Modlmeier A.P., Pruitt J.N. Exploring the effects of individual traits and within-colony variation on task differentiation and collective behavior in a desert social spider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2014, 68:839-850.
31. Keiser C.N., Pruitt J.N. Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2014, 281:20141424. 10.1098/rspb.2014.1424.
32. King A.J., Williams L.J., Mettke-Hofmann C. The effects of social conformity on gouldian finch personality. Animal Behaviour 2015, 99:25-31.
33. Lubin Y., Bilde T. The evolution of sociality in spiders. Advances in the Study of Behavior 2007, 37:83-145.
34. Lin N., Michener C.D. Evolution of sociality in insects. Quarterly Review of Biology 1972, 47:131-159.
35. Modlmeier A.P., Forrester N.J., Pruitt J.N. Habitat structure helps guide the emergence of colony-level personality in social spiders. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2014, 68:1965-1972.
36. Modlmeier A.P., Keiser C., Shearer T., Pruitt J.N. Species-specific influence of group composition on collective behaviors in ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2014, 68:1929-1937.
37. Modlmeier A.P., Liebmann J.E., Foitzik S. Diverse societies are more productive: a lesson from ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2012, 279:2142-2150.
38. Oster G., Wilson E.O. Castes and ecology in the social insects 1978, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
39. Pinter-Wollman N., Gordon D.M., Holmes S. Nest site and weather effect the personality of harvester ant colonies. Behavioral Ecology 2012, 23:1022-1029.
40. Pruitt J.N. Areal-time eco-evolutionary dead-end strategy is mediated by the traits of lineage progenitors and interactions with colony invaders. Ecology Letters 2013, 16:879-886.
41. Pruitt J.N., Goodnight C.J. Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted colony compositions. Nature 2014, 514:359-362.
42. Pruitt J.N., Grinsted L., Settepani V. Linking levels of personality: personalities of the 'average' and 'most extreme' group members predict colony-level personality. Animal Behaviour 2013, 86:391-399.
43. Pruitt J.N., Iturralde G., Aviles L., Riechert S.E. Amazonian social spiders share similar within-colony behavioural variation and behavioural syndromes. Animal Behaviour 2011, 82:1449-1455.
44. Pruitt J.N., Keiser C.N. The personality types of key catalytic individuals shape colonies' collective behaviour and success. Animal Behaviour 2014, 93:87-95.
45. Pruitt J.N., Oufiero C.E., Aviles L., Riechert S.E. Iterative evolution of increased behavioral variation characterizes the transition to sociality in spiders and proves advantageous. American Naturalist 2012, 180:496-510.
46. Pruitt J.N., Riechert S.E. How within-group behavioral variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011, 278:1209-1215.
47. Purcell J., Aviles L. Gradients of precipitation and ant abundance may contribute to the altitudinal range limit of subsocial spiders: insights from a transplant experiment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2008, 275:2617-2625.
48. Ratnieks F.L.W., Anderson C. Task partitioning in insect societies. Insectes Sociaux 1999, 46:95-108.
49. Riechert S.E., Hedrick A.V. Atest for correlations among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis asperta (Araneae, Agelenidae). Animal Behaviour 1993, 46:669-675.
50. Robinson E.J.H., Feinerman O., Franks N.R. Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 276:4373-4380.
51. Seeley T.D. Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1982, 11:287-293.
52. Settepani V., Grinsted L., Granfeldt J., Jensen J.L., Bilde T. Task specialization in two social spiders, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Eresidae) and Anelosimus eximius (Theridiidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2013, 26:51-62.
53. Sih A., Bell A., Johnson J.C. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2004, 19:372-378.
54. Sloan Wilson D., Clark A.B., Coleman K., Dearstyne T. Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1994, 9:442-446.
55. Smith A. The wealth of nations 1776, W. Strahan & T. Cadell, London, U.K.
56. Whitehouse M.E.A., Lubin Y. The functions of societies and the evolution of group living: spider societies as a test case. Biological Reviews 2005, 80:347-361.
57. Willey M.B., Jackson R.R. Predatory behavior of a social spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Araneae, Eresidae): why attack first?. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 1993, 71:2220-2223.
58. Wilson E.O. The insect societies 1971, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Wilson E.O. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Atta). 1. The overall pattern in Atta sexdens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1980, 7:143-156.
60. Wilson E.O. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Atta). 3. Ergonomic resiliency in foraging by Atta cephalotes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1983, 14:47-54.
61. Wilson E.O. Causes of ecological success: the case of ants. Journal of Animal Ecology 1987, 56:1-9.
62. Wright C., Holbrook C.T., Pruitt J. Animal personality aligns task specialization and task proficiency in a spider society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014, 111:9533-9537.
63. Yip E.C., Powers K.S., Aviles L. Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:11818-11822.
64. Yip E.C., Rayor L.S. The influence of siblings on body condition in a social spider: is prey sharing cooperation or competition?. Animal Behaviour 2013, 85:1161-1168.
65. Zhongqiu L., Zhigang J. Group size effect on vigilance: evidence from Tibetan gazelle in upper Buha River, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Behavioural Processes 2008, 78:25-28.