Habitat structure helps guide the emergence of colony-level personality in social spiders

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1965-1972

  Modlmeier, Andreas P ^a   Forrester, Nicole J ^a   Pruitt, Jonathan N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective behavior; Habitat structure; Manipulation; Personality; Prey capture; Social spiders

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; EMERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FORAGING EFFICIENCY; HABITAT STRUCTURE; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; PREY CAPTURE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPIDER;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; STEGODYPHUS DUMICOLA;

EID: 84920149722     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: 14320762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-014-1802-z     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Avilés L (1997) Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent-sociality in spiders. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, p 486
2. Barkae ED, Scharf I, Abramsky Z, Ovadia O (2012) Jack of all trades, master of all: a positive association between habitat niche breadth and foraging performance in pit-building antlion larvae. Plos One 7:e33506
3. Bengston SE, Dornhaus A (2014) Be meek or be bold? A colony-level behavioural syndrome in ants. P R Soc B 281:20140518
4. Brown C, Irving E (2014) Individual personality traits influence group exploration in a feral guppy population. Behav Ecol 25:95–101
5. Burd M, Shiwakoti N, Sarvi M, Rose G (2010) Nest architecture and traffic flow: large potential effects from small structural features. Ecol Entomol 35:464–468
6. Chmiel K, Herberstein ME, Elgar MA (2000) Web damage and feeding experience influence web site tenacity in the orb-web spider Argiope keyserlingi Karsch. Anim Behav 60:821–826
7. Dall SRX, Houston AI, McNamara JM (2004) The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol Lett 7:734–739
8. Deb R, Bhattacharya M, Balakrishnan R (2012) Females of a tree cricket prefer larger males but not the lower frequency male calls that indicate large body size. Anim Behav 84:137–149
9. Detrain C, Deneubourg (2002) Complexity of environment and parsimony of decision rules in insect societies. Biol Bull 202: 268–274
10. Downing HA, Jeanne RL (1986) Intra- and inter specific variation in nest architecture in the paper wasp Polistes (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect Soc 33:422–443
11. Dyer JR, Croft DP, Morrell LJ, Krause J (2009) Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy. Behav Ecol 20:165–171
12. Farji-Brener A (2000) Leaf-cutting ant nests in temperate environments: mounds, mound damages and nest mortality rate in Acromyrmex lobicornis. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 35:131–138
13. Farji-Brener A (2003) Microhabitat selection by antlion larvae, Myrmeleon crudelis: effect of soil particle size on pit-trap design and prey capture. J Insect Behav 16:783–796
14. Gordon DM, Dektar KN, Pinter-Wollman N (2013) Harvester ant colony variation in foraging activity and response to humidity. Plos One 8:e63363
15. Guevara J, Avilés L (2011) Influence of body size and level of cooperation on the prey capture efficiency of two sympatric social spiders exhibiting an included niche pattern. Funct Ecol 25:859–867
16. Henschel JR (1998) Predation on social and solitary individuals of the spider Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae, Eresidae). J Arachnol 26:61–69
17. Henschel J, Lubin Y, Schneider J (1995) Sexual competition in an inbreeding social spider, Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae: Eresidae). Insect Soc 42:419–426
18. Jandt JM, Bengston S, Pinter-Wollman N, Pruitt JN, Raine NE, Dornhaus A, Sih A (2014) Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels. Biol Rev 89:48–67
19. Keiser CN, Jones DK, Modlmeier AP, Pruitt JN (2014a) Exploring the effects of individual traits and within-colony variation on task differentiation and collective behavior in a desert social spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:839–850
20. Keiser CN, Modlmeier AP, Singh N, Jones DK, Pruitt JN (2014b) Exploring how a shift in the physical environment shapes individual and group behavior across two social contexts. Ethology 120:825–833
21. Lubin Y, Bilde T (2007) The evolution of sociality in spiders. Adv Stud Behav 37:83–145
22. McNett BJ, Rypstra AL (2000) Habitat selection in a large orb‐weaving spider: vegetational complexity determines site selection and distribution. Ecol Entomol 25:423–432
23. McReynolds CN (2000) The impact of habitat features on web features and prey capture of Argiope aurantia (Araneae, Araneidae). J Arachnol 28:169–179
24. Modlmeier AP, Keiser CN, Watters JV, Sih A, Pruitt JN (2014a) The keystone individual concept: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Anim Behav 89:53–62
25. Modlmeier AP, Keiser CN, Shearer TA, Pruitt JN (2014b) Species-specific influence of group composition on collective behaviors in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (doi: 10.1007/s00265-014-1799-3)
26. Nentwig W (1985) Social spiders catch larger prey: a study of Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:79–85
27. Payton ME, Greenstone MH, Schenker N (2003) Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: what do they mean in terms of statistical significance? J Insect Sci 3:34
28. Pie MR, Rosengaus RB, Traniello JFA (2004) Nest architecture, activity pattern, worker density and the dynamics of disease transmission in social insects. J Theor Biol 226:45–51
29. Pinter-Wollman N (2012) Personality in social insects: how does worker personality determine colony personality? Curr Zool 58:580–588
30. Pinter-Wollman N, Gordon DM, Holmes S (2012) Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies. Behav Ecol 23:1022–1029
31. Pruitt JN (2013) A real-time eco-evolutionary dead-end strategy is mediated by the traits of lineage progenitors and interactions with colony invaders. Ecol Lett 16:879–886
32. Pruitt JN, Keiser CN (2014) The personality type of key catalytic individuals shape colonies’ collective behavior and success. Anim Behav 93:87–95
33. Pruitt JN, Riechert S (2011) Within-group behavioral variation promotes biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1055–1060
34. Pruitt JN, Demes KW, Dittrich‐Reed DR (2011a) Temperature mediates shifts in individual aggressiveness, activity level, and social behavior in a spider. Ethology 117:318–325
35. Pruitt JN, DiRienzo N, Kralj-Fišer S, Johnson JC, Sih A (2011b) Individual- and condition-dependent effects on habitat choice and choosiness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1987–1995
36. Pruitt JN, Grinsted L, Settepani V (2013) Linking levels of personality: personalities of the ‘average’ and ‘most extreme’ group members predict colony-level personality. Anim Behav 86:391–399
37. Reale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:291–318
38. Riechert S (1976) Web-site selection in the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta. Oikos:311–315
39. Risch P (1977) Quantitative analysis of orb web patterns in four species of spiders. Behav Genet 7:199–238
40. Robinson JV (1981) The effect of architectural variation in habitat on a spider community: an experimental field study. Ecology:73–80
41. Ruch J, Heinrich L, Bilde T, Schneider JM (2012) Site selection and foraging in the eresid spider Stegodyphus tentoriicola. J Insect Behav 25:1–11
42. Rypstra AL (1982) Building a better insect trap; an experimental investigation of prey capture in a variety of spider webs. Oecologia 52:31–36
43. Salomon M, Lubin Y (2007) Cooperative breeding increases reproductive success in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae, Eresidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1743–1750
44. Sandoval C (1994) Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata: a response to variable prey type. Funct Ecol:701–707
45. Scharf I, Modlmeier AP, Fries S, Tirard C, Foitzik S (2012) Characterizing the collective personality of ant societies: aggressive colonies do not abandon their home. Plos One 7:e33314
46. Sih A, Bell AM (2008) Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes. Adv Stud Behav 38:227–281
47. Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277
48. Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Deneubourg J-L (1999) The mechanisms and rules of coordinated building in social insects. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg J, Pasteels J (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 309–330
49. Tschinkel WR (2003) Subterranean ant nests: trace fossils past and future? Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 192:321–333
50. Tschinkel WR (2004) The nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. J Insect Sci 4:21
51. Tschinkel WR (2013) A method for using ice to construct subterranean ant nests (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and other soil cavities. Myrmecol News 18:99–102
52. Uetz GW (1991) Habitat structure and spider foraging. In: Bell S, McCoy E, Mushinsky H (eds) Habitat structure. Springer Netherlands, pp 325–348
53. Venner S, Casas J (2005) Spider webs designed for rare but life-saving catches. P R Soc B 272:1587–1592
54. Venner S, Pasquet A, Leborgne R (2000) Web-building behaviour in the orb-weaving spider Zygiella x-notata: influence of experience. Anim Behav 59:603–611
55. Vollrath F, Downes M, Krackow S (1997) Design variability in web geometry of an orb-weaving spider. Physiol Behav 62:735–743
56. Wray MK, Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2011) Collective personalities in honeybee colonies are linked to colony fitness. Anim Behav 81:559–568
57. Yip EC, Powers KS, Avilés L (2008) Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:11818–11822