Iterative evolution of increased behavioral variation characterizes the transition to sociality in spiders and proves advantageous

American Naturalist

Volumn 180, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 496-510

  Pruitt, Jonathan N ^a   Oufiero, Christopher E ^b   Avilés, Leticia ^c   Riechert, Susan E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive caste demography; Behavioral syndrome; Temperament; Theridiidae

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; ADAPTATION; AGGRESSION; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COLONY; MORPHOLOGY; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); SOCIAL INSECT; SPIDER; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; WIND VELOCITY;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPIDER;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; PHYLOGENY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPIDERS;

ANELOSIMUS; ANELOSIMUS EXIMIUS; ARANEAE; HEXAPODA; THERIDIIDAE;

EID: 84866312927     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/667576     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agnarsson, I. 2006. A revision of the New World eximius lineage of Anelosimus (Araneae, Theridiidae) and a phylogenetic analysis using worldwide exemplars. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 146:453-593.
2. Agnarsson, I., L. Avilés, J. A. Coddington, andW. P. Maddison. 2006. Sociality in theridiid spiders: repeated origins of an evolutionary dead end. Evolution 60:2342-2351.
3. Agnarsson, I., M. Kuntner, J. A. Coddington, and T. A. Blackledge. 2010. Shifting continents, not behaviours: independent colonization of solitary and subsocial Anelosimus spider lineages on Madagascar (Araneae, Theridiidae). Zoologica Scripta 39:75-87.
4. Avilés, L. 1997. Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent sociality in spiders. Pages 476-498 in J. C. Choe and B. Crespi, eds. The evolution of social behaviour in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Avilés, L., I. Agnarsson, P. A. Salazar, J. Purcell, G. Iturralde, E. C. Yip, K. S. Powers, et al. 2007. Altitudinal patterns of spider sociality and the biology of a new midelevation social Anelosimus species in Ecuador. American Naturalist 170:783-792.
6. Avilés, L., W. P. Maddison, and I. Agnarsson. 2006. A new independently derived social spider with explosive colony proliferation and a female size dimorphism. Biotropica 38:743-753.
7. Bergmuller, R., and M. Taborsky. 2010. Animal personality due to social niche specialisation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:504-511.
8. Beshers, S. N., and J. H. Fewell. 2001. Models of division of labor in social insects. Annual Review of Entomology 46:413-440.
9. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
10. Blumstein, D. T., and K. B. Armitage. 1997. Does sociality drive the evolution of communicative complexity? a comparative test with ground-dwelling sciurid alarm calls. American Naturalist 150:179-200.
11. Burns, J. G., and A. G. Dyer. 2008. Diversity of speed-accuracy strategies benefits social insects. Current Biology 18:R953-R954.
12. Caesar, S., M. Karlsson, and A. Forsman. 2010. Diversity and relatedness enhance survival in colour polymorphic grasshoppers. PLoS ONE 5:e10880.
13. Campon, F. F. 2007. Group foraging in the colonial spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneidae): effect of resource levels and prey size. Animal Behaviour 74:1551-1562.
14. Campon, F. F. 2008. More sharing when there is less: insights on spider sociality from an orb-weaver's perspective. Animal Behaviour 75: 1063-1073.
15. Campon, F. F. 2010. Cross-habitat variation in the phenology of a colonial spider: insights from a reciprocal transplant study. Naturwissenschaften 97:279-289.
16. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1993. Coevolution of neocortical size, group-size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:681-694.
17. Ebert, D. 1998. Behavioral asymmetry in relation to body weight and hunger in the tropical social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae). Journal of Arachnology 26:70-80.
18. Elgar, M. A. 1989. Predator vigilance and group-size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 64:13-33.
19. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
20. Foelix, R. F. 1996. Biology of spiders. Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Furey, R. E., and S. E. Riechert. 1989. Agelena-consociata (Araneae, Agelenidae) and its nest associates: insect cleaners. Journal of Arachnology 17:240-242.
22. Graham, S., M. R. Myerscough, J. C. Jones, and B. P. Oldroyd. 2006. Modelling the role of intracolonial genetic diversity on regulation of brood temperature in honey bee (Apis mellifera l.) colonies. Insectes Sociaux 53:226-232.
23. Guevara, J., and L. Avilés. 2007. Multiple techniques confirm elevational differences in insect size that may influence spider sociality. Ecology 88:2015-2023.
24. Guevara, J., and L. Avilés. 2011. Influence of body size and level of cooperation on the prey capture efficiency of two sympatric social spiders exhibiting an included niche pattern. Functional Ecology 25:859-867.
25. Guevara, J., M. O. Gonzaga, J. Vasconcellos-Neto, and L. Avilés. 2011. Sociality and resource use: insights from a community of social spiders in Brazil. Behavioral Ecology 22:630-638.
26. Hillesheim, E., N. Koeniger, and R. F. A. Moritz. 1989. Colony performance in honeybees (Apis-mellifera-capensisesch) depends on the proportion of subordinate and dominant workers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24:291-296.
27. Holbrook, C. T., R. M. Clark, R. Jeanson, S. M. Bertram, P. F. Kukuk, and J. H. Fewell. 2009. Emergence and consequences of division of labor in associations of normally solitary sweat bees. Ethology 115:301-310.
28. Hölldobler, B., and E. O. Wilson. 1990. The ants. Belknap, Cambridge, MA.
29. Ives, A. R., P. E. Midford, and T. Garland Jr. 2007. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Systematic Biology 56:252-270.
30. Iwaniuk, A. N., and K. E. Arnold. 2004. Is cooperative breeding associated with bigger brains? a comparative test in the Corvida (Passeriformes). Ethology 110:203-220.
31. Jeanson, R., R. M. Clark, C. T. Holbrook, S. M. Bertram, J. H. Fewell, and P. F. Kukuk. 2008. Division of labour and socially induced changes in response thresholds in associations of solitary halictine bees. Animal Behaviour 76:593-602.
32. Jeanson, R., and J. H. Fewell. 2008. Influence of the social context on division of labor in ant foundress associations. Behavioral Ecology 19:567-574.
33. Jeanson, R., P. F. Kukuk, and J. H. Fewell. 2005. Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance. Animal Behaviour 70:1183-1193.
34. Jones, T. C., J. N. Pruitt, and S. E. Riechert. 2010. Reproductive success in a socially polymorphic spider: social individuals experience depressed reproductive success in isolation. Ecological Entomology 35:684-690.
35. Jones, T. C., S. E. Riechert, S. E. Dalrymple, and P. G. Parker. 2007. Fostering model explains variation in levels of sociality in a spider system. Animal Behaviour 73:195-204.
36. Lubin, Y., and T. Bilde. 2007. The evolution of sociality in spiders. Advances in the Study of Behavior 37:83-145.
37. Maynard Smith, J., and E. Szathmary. 1995. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
38. Modlmeier, A. P., and S. Foitzik. 2011. Productivity increases with variation in aggression among group members in Temnothorax ants. Behavioral Ecology 22:1026-1032.
39. Modlmeier, A. P., J. E. Liebmann, and S. Foitzik. 2012. Diverse societies are more productive: a lesson from ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279:2142-2150.
40. Myerscough, M. R., and B. P. Oldroyd. 2004. Simulation models of the role of genetic variability in social insect task allocation. Insectes Sociaux 51:146-152.
41. Nonacs, P., and K. M. Kapheim. 2007. Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 2253-2265.
42. Nonacs, P., and K. M. Kapheim. 2008. Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity at the genome level. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 631-635.
43. Oster, G. F., and E. O. Wilson. 1978. Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
44. Oufiero, C. E., G. E. A. Gartner, S. C. Adolph, and T. Garland Jr. Forthcoming. Latitudinal and climatic variation in scale counts and body size in Sceloporus lizards: a phylogenetic perspective. Evolution.
45. Perkins, T. A., S. E. Riechert, and T. C. Jones. 2007. Interactions between the social spider Anelosimus studiosus (Araneae, Theridiidae) and foreign spiders that frequent its nests. Journal of Arachnology 35:143-152.
46. Powers, K. S., and L. Avilés. 2007. The role of prey size and abundance in the geographical distribution of spider sociality. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:995-1003.
47. Pruitt, J. N., and M. C. O. Ferrari. 2011. Intraspecific trait variants determine the nature of interspecific interactions in habitat forming species. Ecology 92:1902-1908.
48. Pruitt, J. N., G. Iturralde, L. Avilés, and S. E. Riechert. 2011. Amazonian social spiders share similar within-colony behavioral variation and behavioral syndromes. Animal Behaviour 82:1449-1455.
49. Pruitt, J. N., and S. E. Riechert. 2009a. Frequency-dependent success of cheaters during foraging bouts might limit their spread within colonies of a socially polymorphic spider. Evolution 63:2966-2973.
50. Pruitt, J. N., and S. E. Riechert. 2009b. Sex matters: sexually dimorphic fitness consequences of a behavioural syndrome. Animal Behaviour 78:175-181.
51. Pruitt, J. N., and S. E. Riechert. 2011a. How within-group behavioral variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:1209-1215.
52. Pruitt, J. N., and S. E. Riechert. 2011b. Within-group behavioral variation promoted biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:1055-1060.
53. Pruitt, J. N., S. E. Riechert, G. Iturralde, M. Vega, B. M. Fitzpatrick, and L. Avilés. 2010. Population differences in behaviour are explained by shared within-population trait correlations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:748-756.
54. Pruitt, J. N., S. E. Riechert, and T. C. Jones. 2008. Behavioural syndromes and their fitness consequences in a socially polymorphic spider, Anelosimus studiosus. Animal Behaviour 76:871-879.
55. Purcell, J., and L. Avilés. 2007. Smaller colonies and more solitary living mark higher elevation populations of a social spider. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:590-597.
56. Purcell, J., and L. Avilés. 2008. Gradients of precipitation and ant abundance may contribute to the altitudinal range limit of subsocial spiders: insights from a transplant experiment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:2617-2625.
57. Riechert, S. E., and T. C. Jones. 2008. Phenotypic variation in the social behaviour of the spider Anelosimus studiosus along a latitudinal gradient. Animal Behaviour 75:1893-1902.
58. Ruckstuhl, K. E., and P. Neuhaus. 2002. Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biological Reviews 77:77-96.
59. Rypstra, A. L. 1993. Prey size, social competition, and the development of reproductive division of labor in social spider groups. American Naturalist 142:868-880.
60. Samuk, K. M., E. E. Ledue, and L. Avilés. 2012. Sister clade comparisons reveal reduced maternal care behavior in social cobweb spiders. Behavioral Ecology 23:35-43.
61. Schmid-Hempel, P. 1992. Worker castes and adaptive demography. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5:1-12.
62. Wilson, E. O. 1987. Causes of ecological success: the case of ants. Journal of Animal Ecology 56:1-9.
63. Yip, E. C., K. S. Powers, and L. Avilés. 2008. Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 11818-11822.