Retraction Note: Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions (Nature, (2014), 514, (359–362), 10.1038/nature13811);Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions

Nature

Volumn 514, Issue 7522, 2014, Pages 359-362

  Pruitt, Jonathan N ^a   Goodnight, Charles J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; EXTINCTION RISK; GROUP SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM; SPIDER; SURVIVORSHIP; WILD POPULATION;

ANELOSIMUS STUDIOSUS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; HABITAT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; MASS EXTINCTION; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROGENY; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SITE SPECIFIC GROUP SELECTION; SPECIES EXTINCTION; SPIDER; WILD SPECIES; ADAPTATION; AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SPIDERS;

EID: 84907699701     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05882-3     Document Type: Erratum

References (29)

1. Wade, M. J. Critical-review of models of group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 53, 101-114 (1978).
2. Wilson, D. S. The group selection controversy-history and current status. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 159-187 (1983).
3. Pruitt, J. N. Behavioural traits of colony founders affect the life history of their colonies. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1026-1032 (2012).
4. Pruitt, J. N. A real-time eco-evolutionary dead-end strategy is mediated by the traits of lineage progenitors and interactions with colony invaders. Ecol. Lett. 16, 879-886 (2013).
5. Pruitt, J. N. & Riechert, S. E. Frequency-dependent success of cheaters during foraging bouts might limit their spread within colonies of a socially polymorphic spider. Evolution 63, 2966-2973 (2009).
6. Riechert, S. E. & Jones, T. C. Phenotypic variation in the social behaviour of the spider Anelosimus studiosus along a latitudinal gradient. Anim. Behav. 75, 1893-1902 (2008).
7. Wilson, D. S. & Wilson, E. O. Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Q. Rev. Biol. 82, 327-348 (2007).
8. Wilson, D. S. Theory of group selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 143-146 (1975).
9. Goodnight, C. On multilevel selection and kin selection: contextual analysis meets direct fitness. Evolution 67, 1539-1548 (2013).
10. Maynard Smith, J. & Wynne Edwards, V. C. Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201, 1145-1147 (1964).
11. Williams, G. C. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought (Princeton Univ. Press, 1972).
12. West, S. A., Griffin, A. S. & Gardner, A. Social semantics: how useful has group selection been? J. Evol. Biol. 21, 374-385 (2008).
13. Pruitt, J. N. & Riechert, S. E. Sex matters: sexually dimorphic fitness consequences of a behavioural syndrome. Anim. Behav. 78, 175-181 (2009).
14. Duncan, S. I., Riechert, S. E., Fitzpatrick, B. M. & Fordyce, J. A. Relatedness and genetic structure in a socially polymorphic population of the spider Anelosimus studiosus. Mol. Ecol. 19, 810-818 (2010).
15. Maynard Smith, J. Group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 51, 277-283 (1976).
16. Gardner, A. & Grafen, A. Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 659-671 (2009).
17. West, S. A., Griffin, A. S. & Gardner, A. Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 415-432 (2007).
18. Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Wild, G. The genetical theory of kin selection. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1020-1043 (2011).
19. Wade, M. J., Bijma, P., Ellen, E. D. & Muir, W. Group selection and social evolution in domesticated animals. Evolutionary Applications 3, 453-465 (2010).
20. Muir, W. M. Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poult. Sci. 75, 447-458 (1996).
21. Wade, M. J. Experimental-study of group selection. Evolution 31, 134-153 (1977).
22. Bijma, P., Muir, W. A. & Van Arendonk, J. A. M. Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175, 277-288 (2007).
23. Ingram, K. K., Pilko, A., Heer, J. & Gordon, D. M. Colony life history and lifetime reproductive success of red harvester ant colonies. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 540-550 (2013).
24. Gordon, D. M. The rewards of restraint in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ant colonies. Nature 498, 91-93 (2013).
25. Eldakar, O. T., Dlugos, M. J., Pepper, J. W. & Wilson, D. S. Population structure mediates sexual conflict in water striders. Science 326, 816-816 (2009).
26. Aviles, L. Interdemic selection and the sex-ratio-a social spider perspective. Am. Nat. 142, 320-345 (1993).
27. Colwell, R. K. Group selection is implicated in the evolution of female-biased sex-ratios. Nature 290, 401-404 (1981).
28. Pruitt, J. N., Riechert, S. E. & Jones, T. C. Behavioural syndromes and their fitness consequences in a socially polymorphic spider, Anelosimus studiosus. Anim. Behav. 76, 871-879 (2008).
29. Pruitt, J. N., Cote, J. & Ferrari, M. C. O. Behavioural trait variants in a habitatforming species dictate the nature of its interactions with and among heterospecifics. Funct. Ecol. 26, 29-36 (2012).