Species-specific influence of group composition on collective behaviors in ants

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1929-1937

  Modlmeier, Andreas P ^a   Keiser, Carl N ^a   Shearer, Taylor A ^a   Pruitt, Jonathan N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggression; Collective behavior; Group composition; Manipulation; Nest relocation; Personality; Social insects

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; ANT; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; NESTING BEHAVIOR; RELOCATION;

FORMICIDAE; HEXAPODA; TEMNOTHORAX; TEMNOTHORAX CURVISPINOSUS; TEMNOTHORAX LONGISPINOSUS;

EID: 85027954021     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: 14320762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-014-1799-3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bell AM, Sih A (2007) Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecol Lett 10:828–834
2. Bengston SE, Dornhaus A (2014) Be meek or be bold? A colony-level behavioural syndrome in ants. P R Soc B 281:20140518
3. Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440
4. Brandt M, Foitzik S (2004) Community context and specialization influence coevolution between a slavemaking ant and its hosts. Ecology 85:2997–3009
5. Brown C, Irving E (2014) Individual personality traits influence group exploration in a feral guppy population. Behav Ecol 25:95–101
6. Chang AT, Sih A (2013) Multilevel selection and effects of keystone hyperaggressive males on mating success and behavior in stream water striders. Behav Ecol 24:1166–1176
7. Crosland MWJ (1990) Variation in ant aggression and kin discrimination ability within and between colonies. J Insect Behav 3:359–379
8. Dall SRX, Houston AI, McNamara JM (2004) The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol Lett 7:734–739
9. Dingemanse NJ, Wright J, Kazem AJN, Thomas DK, Hickling R, Dawnay N (2007) Behavioural syndromes differ predictably between 12 populations of three-spined stickleback. J Anim Ecol 76:1128–1138
10. Dornhaus A (2008) Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant. PLoS Biol 6:e285
11. Dornhaus A, Holley J-A, Pook VG, Worswick G, Franks NR (2008) Why do not all workers work? Colony size and workload during emigrations in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:43–51
12. Dyer JR, Croft DP, Morrell LJ, Krause J (2009) Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy. Behav Ecol 20:165–171
13. Foitzik S, Heinze J (1998) Nest site limitation and colony take over in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Behav Ecol 9:367–375
14. Franks NR, Deneubourg JL (1997) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behaviour and the nest’s dynamics. Anim Behav 54:779–796
15. Gordon DM, Guetz A, Greene MJ, Holmes S (2011) Colony variation in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ants. Behav Ecol 22:429–435
16. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, USA
17. Headley AE (1943) Population studies of two species of ants, Leptothorax longispinosus Roger and Leptothorax curvispinosus Mayr. Ann Entomol Soc Am 36:743–753
18. Hui A, Pinter-Wollman N (2014) Individual variation in exploratory behaviour improves speed and accuracy of collective nest selection by Argentine ants. Anim Behav 93:261–266
19. Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2014) Bumblebee response thresholds and body size: does worker diversity increase colony performance? Anim Behav 87:97–106
20. Jandt JM, Bengston S, Pinter-Wollman N, Pruitt JN, Raine NE, Dornhaus A, Sih A (2014) Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels. Biol Rev 89:48–67
21. Jeanson R, Weidenmüller A (2013) Interindividual variability in social insects—proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Biol Rev Online first
22. Keiser CN, Wright CM, Singh N, DeShane JA, Modlmeier AP, Pruitt JN (in review) Cross-fostering by foreign conspecific queens and slavemaking workers influences individual and colony-level personality.
23. Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 55:623–655
24. Konrad M, Pamminger T, Foitzik S (2012) Two pathways ensuring social harmony. Naturwissenschaften 99:627–636
25. Kurvers RHJM, Adamczyk VMAP, van Wieren SE, Prins HHT (2011) The effect of boldness on decision-making in barnacle geese is group-size-dependent. P R Soc B 278:2018–2024
26. Kurvers RHJM, Nolet BA, Prins HHT, Ydenberg RC, van Oers K (2012) Boldness affects foraging decisions in barnacle geese: an experimental approach. Behav Ecol 23:1155–1161
27. Liker A, Bókony V (2009) Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:7893–7898
28. Modlmeier AP, Foitzik S (2011) Productivity increases with variation in aggression among group members in Temnothorax ants. Behav Ecol 22:1026–1032
29. Modlmeier AP, Liebmann JE, Foitzik S (2012) Diverse societies are more productive: a lesson from ants. P R Soc B 279:2142–2150
30. Modlmeier AP, Keiser CN, Watters JV, Sih A, Pruitt JN (2014) The keystone individual concept: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Anim Behav 89:53–62
31. Nakayama S, Stumpe MC, Manica A, Johnstone RA (2013) Experience overrides personality differences in the tendency to follow but not in the tendency to lead. P R Soc B 280:20131724
32. Nonacs P, Kapheim KM (2007) Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity. J Evol Biol 20:2253–2265
33. Nonacs P, Kapheim KM (2008) Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity at the genome level. J Evol Biol 21:631–635
34. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton
35. Pamminger T, Modlmeier AP, Suette S, Pennings PS, Foitzik S (2012) Raiders from the sky: slavemaker founding queens select for aggressive host colonies. Biol Lett 8:748–750
36. Pinter-Wollman N (2012) Personality in social insects: how does worker personality determine colony personality? Curr Zool 58:580–588
37. Pinter-Wollman N, Gordon DM, Holmes S (2012) Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies. Behav Ecol 23:1022–1029
38. Pratt S, Mallon E, Sumpter D, Franks N (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127
39. Pruitt JN (2013) A real-time eco-evolutionary dead-end strategy is mediated by the traits of lineage progenitors and interactions with colony invaders. Ecol Lett 16:879–886
40. Pruitt J, Riechert S (2011a) Within-group behavioral variation promotes biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1055–1060
41. Pruitt JN, Riechert SE (2011b) How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group. P R Soc B 278:1209–1215
42. Pruitt JN, Oufiero CE, Aviles L, Riechert SE (2012) Iterative evolution of increased behavioral variation characterizes the transition to sociality in spiders and proves advantageous. Am Nat 180:496–510
43. Pruitt JN, Grinsted L, Settepani V (2013) Linking levels of personality: personalities of the ‘average’ and ‘most extreme’ group members predict colony-level personality. Anim Behav 86:391–399
44. Robson SK, Traniello JFA (1999) Key individuals and the organization of labor in ants. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels J (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp 239–259
45. Roulston TH, Buczkowski G, Silverman J (2003) Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insect Soc 50:151–159
46. Scharf I, Modlmeier AP, Fries S, Tirard C, Foitzik S (2012) Characterizing the collective personality of ant societies: aggressive colonies do not abandon their home. Plos One 7:e33314
47. Sih A, Watters JV (2005) The mix matters: behavioural types and group dynamics in water striders. Behaviour 142:1417–1431
48. Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378
49. Sih A, Cote J, Evans M, Fogarty S, Pruitt J (2012) Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. Ecol Lett 15:278–289
50. Smith BR, Blumstein DT (2008) Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 19:448–455
51. Storey JD (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc Ser B-Stat Methodol 64:479–498
52. Sumpter DJT, Krause J, James R, Couzin ID, Ward AJW (2008) Consensus decision making by fish. Curr Biol 18:1773–1777
53. Sweeney K, Gadd RDH, Hess ZL, McDermott DR, MacDonald L, Cotter P, Armagost F, Chen JZ, Berning AW, DiRienzo N, Pruitt JN (2013) Assessing the effects of rearing environment, natural selection, and developmental stage on the emergence of a behavioral syndrome. Ethology 119:436–447
54. Tanner CJ (2006) Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: a team-fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila. P R Soc B 273:2737–2742
55. Tanner CJ, Adler FR (2009) To fight or not to fight: context-dependent interspecific aggression in competing ants. Anim Behav 77:297–305
56. Ward AJW, Sumpter DJT, Couzin ID, Hart PJB, Krause J (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:6948–6953
57. Wilson EO (1987) Causes of ecological success: the case of the ants. J Anim Ecol 56:1–9
58. Wray MK, Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2011) Collective personalities in honeybee colonies are linked to colony fitness. Anim Behav 81:559–568