Influence of body size and level of cooperation on the prey capture efficiency of two sympatric social spiders exhibiting an included niche pattern

Functional Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 859-867

  Guevara, Jennifer ^a   Avilés, Leticia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anelosimus; Diet; Foraging behaviour; Group foraging; Group size; Niche differentiation; Performance; Prey size; Sociality; Spider community

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; BODY SIZE; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FORAGING EFFICIENCY; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GROUP BEHAVIOR; GROUP SIZE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NICHE; PREY CAPTURE; PREY LOCATION; PREY SIZE; RESOURCE USE; SPIDER; SYMPATRY;

ECUADOR;

ANELOSIMUS; ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; HEXAPODA;

EID: 79959821815     PISSN: 02698463     EISSN: 13652435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01843.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agnarsson, I. (2006) A revision of the New World eximius lineage of Anelosimus (Araneae, Theridiidae) and a phylogenetic analysis using worldwide exemplars. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 146, 453-693.
2. Avilés, L. (1997) Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent-sociality in spiders. Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids (eds J.C. Choe & B.J. Crespi), pp. 476-498. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Avilés, L., Maddison, W.P., Salazar, P.A., Stevez, G., Tufino, P. & Canas, G. (2001) Aranas sociales de la Amazonia Ecuatoriana, con notas sobre seis especies sociales no descritas previamente. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 74, 619-638.
4. Avilés, L., Agnarsson, I., Salazar, P.A., Purcell, J., Iturralde, G., Yip, E.C., Powers, K.S. & Bukowski, T.C. (2007) Altitudinal patterns of spider sociality and the biology of a new mid-elevation social Anelosimus species in Ecuador. American Naturalist, 170, 783-792.
5. Baird, R.W. & Dill, L.M. (1996) Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 408-416.
6. Beckerman, A.P. (2000) Counterintuitive outcomes of interspecific competition between two grasshopper species along a resource gradient. Ecology, 81, 948-957.
7. Bonner, J.T. (2006) Why Size Matters: From Bacteria to Blue Whales. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
8. Brach, V. (1975) The biology of the social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science, 74, 37-41.
9. Buskirk, R.E. (1982) Sociality in the arachnida. Social Insects, Vol. II (ed. H.R. Hermann), pp. 281-367. Academic Press, New York.
10. Cameron, G.N. (1971) Niche overlap and competition in woodrats. Journal of Mammalogy, 52, 288-296.
11. Cao, T. & Dornhaus, A. (2008) Ants under crowded conditions consume more energy. Biology Letters, 4, 613.
12. Caraco, T. & Wolf, L.L. (1975) Ecological determinants of group sizes of foraging lions. American Naturalist, 109, 343-352.
13. Cerdá, X., Retana, J. & Cros, S. (1998) Prey size reverses the outcome of interference interactions of scavenger ants. Oikos, 82, 99-110.
14. Chase, J.M. (1996) Differential competitive interactions and the included niche: an experimental analysis with grasshoppers. Oikos, 76, 103-112.
15. Chase, J.M. & Belovsky, G.E. (1994) Experimental evidence for the included niche. American Naturalist, 143, 514-527.
16. Chown, S.L., Marais, E., Terblanche, J.S., Klok, C.J., Lighton, J.R.B. & Blackburn, T.M. (2007) Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model. Functional Ecology, 21, 282-290.
17. Christenson, T.E. (1984) Behaviour of colonial and solitary spiders of the Theridiid species Anelosimus eximius. Animal Behaviour, 32, 725-734.
18. Clark, C.W. (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theoretical Population Biology, 30, 45-75.
19. Cody, M.L. (1971) Finch flocks in the Mohave Desert. Theoretical Population Biology, 2, 142-158.
20. Colwell, R.K. & Fuentes, E.R. (1975) Experimental studies of the niche. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 6, 281-310.
21. Dial, K.P., Greene, E. & Irschick, D.J. (2008) Allometry of behavior. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 394-401.
22. Douglas, M.E. & Matthews, W.J. (1992) Does morphology predict ecology - hypothesis-testing within a fresh-water stream fish assemblage. Oikos, 65, 213-224.
23. Enders, F. (1975) Influence of hunting manner on prey size, particularly in spiders with long attack distances (Araneidae, Linyphiidae, and Salticidae). American Naturalist, 109, 737-763.
24. Gittleman, J.L. (1989) Carnivore group living: comparative trends. Carnivore Behavior, Ecology and Evolution (ed. J.L. Gittleman), pp. 183-207. Cornell University Press, New York.
25. Glazier, D.S. (2005) Beyond the "3/4-power law": variation in the intra- and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 80, 611-662.
26. Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. (2006) Evolution of character displacement in Darwin's finches. Science, 313, 224-226.
27. Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R., Smith, J.N.M., Abbott, I.J. & Abbott, L.K. (1976) Darwins finches-population variation and natural selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 73, 257-261.
28. Guevara, J. & Avilés, L. (2007) Multiple sampling techniques confirm differences in insect size between low and high elevations that may influence levels of spider sociality. Ecology, 88, 2015-2023.
29. Guevara, J. & Avilés, L. (2008) Elevational changes in the composition of insects and other terrestrial arthropods at tropical latitudes: a comparison of multiple sampling methods and social spider diets. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2, 142-152.
30. Guevara, J., Gonzaga, M.O., Vasconcellos-Netto, J. & Avilés, L. (in press) Sociality and resource use: insights from a community of social spiders in Brazil. Behavioral Ecology.
31. Herrel, A. & O'Reilly, J.C. (2006) Ontogenetic scaling of bite force in lizards and turtles. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 79, 31-42.
32. Herrel, A., Joachim, R., Vanhooydonck, B. & Irschick, D.J. (2006) Ecological consequences of ontogenetic changes in head shape and bite performance in the Jamaican lizard Anolis lineatopus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89, 443-454.
33. Irschick, D.J., Meyers, J.J., Husak, J.F. & Le Galliard, J.-F. (2007) How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10, 177-196.
34. Kleiman, D.G. (1966) The comparative social behavior of the Canidae. American Zoologist, 6, 182.
35. Krebs, J.R., Macrober, M.H. & Cullen, J.M. (1972) Flocking and feeding in great tit Parus-Major-Experimental study. Ibis, 114, 507-530.
36. Kruuk, H. (1966) Clan-system and feeding habits of Spotted Hyenas (Crocuta crocuta Erxleben). Nature, 209, 1257-1258.
37. Kullmann, E.J. (1972) Evolution of social behavior in spiders (Araneae; Eresidae and Theridiidae). American Zoologist, 12, 419-426.
38. Levi, H. (1963) The American spiders of the genus Anelosimus (Araneae: Theridiidae). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 82, 30-48.
39. Lubin, Y. & Bilde, T. (2007) The evolution of sociality in spiders. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 37, 83-145.
40. McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 178-185.
41. Miles, D.B. & Ricklets, R.E. (1984) The correlation between ecology and morphology in deciduous forest passerine birds. Ecology, 65, 1629-1640.
42. Miller, R.S. (1967) Pattern and process in competition. Advances in Ecological Research, 4, 1-74.
43. Miller, R.S. (1968) Conditions of competition between redwings and yellowheaded blackbirds. Journal of Animal Ecology, 37, 43-62.
44. Nentwig, W. (1985) Social spiders catch larger prey: a study of Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17, 79-85.
45. Nudds, T.D. (1978) Covergence of group size strategies by mammalian social carnivores. American Naturalist, 112, 957-960.
46. Owen-Smith, N. & Mills, M.G.L. (2008) Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 173-183.
47. Petchey, O.L. & Gaston, K.J. (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters, 9, 741-758.
48. Peters, R.H. (1983) The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Pitcher, T.J. & Magurran, A.E. (1983) Shoal size, patch profitability and information exchange in foraging goldfish. Animal Behaviour, 31, 546-555.
50. Pitcher, T.J., Magurran, A.E. & Winfield, I. (1982) Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10, 149-151.
51. Powers, K.S. & Avilés, L. (2007) The role of prey size and abundance in the geographical distribution of spider sociality. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 995-1003.
52. Pulliam, H.R. (1985) Foraging efficiency, resource partitioning, and the coexistence of sparrow species. Ecology, 66, 1829-1836.
53. Pulliam, H.R. & Caraco, T. (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? Behavioral Ecology (eds J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies), pp. 122-147. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
54. Purcell, J. & Avilés, L. (2007) Smaller colonies and more solitary living mark higher elevation populations of a social spider. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 590-597.
55. Rand, A.L. (1954) Social feeding behavior of birds. Fieldana Zoologica, 36, 1-71.
56. Rypstra, A.L. (1990) Prey capture and feeding efficiency of social and solitary spiders: a comparison. Acta Zoologica Fennicci, 190, 339-343.
57. Rypstra, A.L. (1993) Prey size, social competition and the development of reproductive division of labor in social spider groups. American Naturalist, 142, 868-880.
58. Rypstra, A.L. & Tirey, R.S. (1989) Observations on the social spider Anelosimus domingo (Araneae, Theridiidae) in southwestern Peru. Journal of Arachnology, 17, 368-371.
59. Schluter, D. (1993) Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks: size, shape, and habitat use efficiency. Ecology, 74, 699-709.
60. Schluter, D. (1995) Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks- trade-offs in feeding performance and growth. Ecology, 76, 82-90.
61. Schoener, T.W. (1974) Competition and the form of habitat shift. Theoretical Population Biology, 6, 265-307.
62. Smith, T.B. (1993) Disruptive selection and the genetics basis of bill size polymorphism in the African finch Pyrenestes. Nature, 363, 618-620.
63. Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
64. Taylor, C.R., Rowntree, V.J. & Caldwell, S.L. (1972) Running up and down hills-some consequences of size. Science, 178, 1096-1097.
65. Wainwright, P.C. (1996) Ecological explanation through functional morphology: the feeding biology of sunfishes. Ecology, 77, 1336-1343.
66. Webb, C.T., Hoeting, J.A., Ames, G.M., Pyne, M.I. & Poff, N.L. (2010) A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. Ecology Letters, 13, 267-283.
67. Werner, E.E. & Hall, D.J. (1974) Optimal foraging and size selection of prey by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis-Macrochirus). Ecology, 55, 1042-1052.
68. Wilson, D.S. (1975) The adequacy of body size as a niche difference. American Naturalist, 109, 769-784.
69. Yip, E.C., Powers, K.S. & Avilés, L. (2008) Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 11818-11822.