Inspiring careers in STEM and healthcare fields through medical simulation embedded in high school science education

Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 210-215

  Berk, Louis J ^a   Muret Wagstaff, Sharon L ^b,c   Goyal, Riya ^d   Joyal, Julie A ^c   Gordon, James A ^c,e   Faux, Russell ^f   Oriol, Nancy E ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f Davis Square Research Associates ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Health care; Medical simulation; Science education; Science, Technology ,Engineering, and mathematics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CAREER CHOICE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84928994931     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00143.2013     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adedokun OA, Bessenbacher AB, Parker LC, Kirkham LL, Burgess WD. Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students' aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self-efficacy. J Res Sci Teach 50: 940-951, 2013.
2. Ahlborg L, Hedman L, Nisell H, Fellander-Tsai L, Enochsson L. Simulator training and non-technical factors improve laparoscopic performance among OBGYN trainees. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92: 1194-1201, 2013.
3. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: the Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 1997.
4. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84: 191-215, 1977.
5. Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV, Pastorelli C. Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Dev 72: 187-206, 2001.
6. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, National Research Council. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits, edited by Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse AW, Feder MA. Washington, DC: National Academies, 2009.
7. Foster KM, Bergin KB, McKenna AF, Millard DL, Perez LC, Prival JT, Rainey DY, Sevian HM, VanderPutten EA, Hamos JE. Partnerships for STEM education. Science 329: 906-907, 2010.
8. Hannover B, Kessels U. Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learn Instruct 14: 51-67, 2004.
9. Hsu L, Huang Y, Hsieh S. The effects of scenario-based communication training on nurses' communication competence and self-efficacy and myocardial infarction knowledge. Patient Educ Couns 95: 356-364, 2014.
10. Ingersoll RM, May H. The magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educ Eval Policy Anal 34: 435-464, 2012.
11. Jensen M, Mattheis A, Loyl A. Offering an anatomy and physiology course through a high school-university partnership: the Minnesota model. Adv Physiol Educ 37: 157-164, 2013.
12. Kjellin A, Hedman L, Escher C, Fellander-Tsai L. Hybrid simulation: bringing motivation to the art of teamwork training in the operating room. Scand J Surg; doi:10.1177/1457496913516897.
13. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Future. Washington, DC: National Academies, 2007.
14. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies, 2010.
15. National Science Foundation. STEM-C Partnerships: MSP (STEM-CP: MSP). Program Solicitation NSF 14-522 (online). http://www.nsf.gov/ pubs/2014/nsf14522/nsf14522.htm [28 May 2014].
16. Oriol NE, Hayden EM, Joyal-Mowschenson J, Muret-Wagstaff S, Faux R, Gordon JA. Using immersive healthcare simulation for physiology education: initial experience in high school, college, and graduate school curricula. Adv Physiol Educ 35: 252-259, 2011.
17. Rogoff B. Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In: Sociocultural Studies of Mind, edited by Wertsch JV, del Rio P, Alvarez A. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995, p. 139-164.
18. Subotnik RF, Tai RH, Rickoff R, Almarode J. Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: what do we know now and what will we know in 5 years? Roeper Rev 32: 7-16, 2010.
19. Sukalich S, Elliott JO, Ruffner G. Teaching medical error disclosure to residents using patient-centered simulation training. Acad Med 89: 136-143, 2014.
20. Syed M, Chemers MM. Ethnic minorities and women in STEM: casting a wide net to address a persistent social problem. J Soc Issues 67: 435-441, 2011.
21. Tai RH, Liu CQ, Maltese AV, Fan X. Planning early for careers in science. Science 312: 1143-1144, 2006.
22. Watkins J, Mazur E. Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. J Coll Sci Teach 42: 36-41, 2013.
23. The White House. Education. Knowledge and Skills for the Jobs of the Future. Educate to Innovate. www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/k-12/ educate-innovate [28 May 2014].
24. Wilke RR. The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. Adv Physiol Educ 27: 207-223, 2003.
25. Zeldin AL, Pajares F. Against the odds: self-efficacy beliefs of women in nathematical, scientific, and technological careers. Am Educ Res J 37: 215-246, 2000.