Offering an anatomy and physiology course through a high school-university partnership: The minnesota model

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 157-164

  Jensen, Murray ^a   Mattheis, Allison ^a   Loyle, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Concurrent enrollment; Constructivism; Experiential learning; High school teachers; Inquiry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878899502     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00147.2012     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: a Call to Action (online). http://visionandchange.org/files/2011/03/VC-Brochure-V6-3.pdf [26 October 2012].
2. Austin-King K, Lee P, Little J, Nathan J. Progress and Possibilities: Trends in Public High School Student Participation With Minnesota's Dual Credit Programs, 2006-2011. St. Paul, MN: Macalester College Center For School Change, 2012.
3. Bransford J, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Research Council, 2000.
4. Brooks J, Brooks M. In Search of Understanding: the Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1993.
5. Brown P. Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning in an introductory anatomy and physiology course with a diverse student population. Adv Physiol Educ 34: 150-155, 2010.
6. Byrd S, Ellington L, Gross P, Jago C, Stern S. Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate: Do They Deserve Gold Star Status? Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007.
7. Cronon W. "Only connect...": the goals of a liberal education. Liberal Educ 85: 6-12, 1999.
8. Edwards L, Hughes KL, Weisberg A. Different Approaches to Dual Enrollment: Understanding Program Features and Their Implications (online). http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/different-approaches-todual- enrollment.html?UID=971 [26 October 2012].
9. Handelsman J, Miller S, Pfund C. Scientific Teaching. New York: Freeman, 2006.
10. Jensen M. College in the Schools - PsTL 1135. Essentials of Human Anatomy and Physiology (online). http://msjensen.cehd.umn.edu/CIS1135/ [7 March 2013].
11. Jensen M. Student Health Information Kiosks (online). http://msjensen.cehd.umn.edu/kiosks/ [26 October 2012].
12. 2 Max (online). http://msjensen.cehd.umn.edu/vo2max/default.asp [26 October 2012].
13. Jensen M, Moore R, Hatch J. Cooperative learning-part I: cooperative quizzes. Am Biol Teach 64: 29-34, 2002.
14. Katz SN. Liberal education on the ropes. Chron Higher Educ 51: B6, 2005.
15. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.
16. McQuillan E. PSEO: are your tax dollars really paying off? Undergrad Econ Rev 23: 1-14, 2007.
17. Michael J, McFarland J. The core principles ("big ideas") of physiology: results of faculty surveys. Adv Physiol Educ 35: 336-341, 2011.
18. Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD. Assessing Science Understanding: a Human Constructivist View. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2000.
19. Pollan M. In Defense of Food: an Eater's Manifesto. New York: Penguin, 2008.