Simulator training and non-technical factors improve laparoscopic performance among OBGYN trainees

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 92, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1194-1201

  Ahlborg, Liv ^a,b   Hedman, Leif ^a   Nisell, Henry ^a   Felländer Tsai, Li ^a   Enochsson, Lars ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Södertälje Hospital   (Sweden)

Author keywords

flow; Laparoscopic surgery; obstetrics and gynecology; residents; self efficacy; simulator training; visuospatial ability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; OBSTETRIC OPERATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; SALPINGECTOMY; SELF CONCEPT; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SWEDEN; UTERINE TUBE OCCLUSION; VIRTUAL REALITY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; GYNECOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRICS; OPERATION DURATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TEACHER;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MENTORS; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRICS; OPERATIVE TIME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF EFFICACY; SWEDEN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84884955515     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12218     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Scott DJ,. Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical simulation. Simul Healthc. 2006; 1: 164-70.
2. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 458-63; discussion 463-4.
3. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, et al. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009; 338: b1802.
4. Aggarwal R, Darzi A,. Simulation to enhance patient safety: why aren't we there yet? Chest. 2011; 140: 854-8.
5. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 364-72.
6. Carthey J,. The role of structured observational research in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12 (Suppl 2): ii13-6. (Pubitemid 37542034)
7. Just MA, Carpenter PA,. Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychol Rev. 1985; 92: 137-72.
8. Hedman L, Strom P, Andersson P, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L,. High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 1275-80. (Pubitemid 44259054)
9. Ahlborg L, Hedman L, Rasmussen C, Felländer-Tsai L, Enochsson L,. Non-technical factors influence laparoscopic simulator performance among OBGYN residents. Gynecol Surg. 2012; 9: 415-20.
10. Bandura A,. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control, 1st edn. New York, NY: Worth Publishers, 1997.
11. Maschuw K, Schlosser K, Kupietz E, Slater EP, Weyers P, Hassan I,. Do soft skills predict surgical performance?: a single-center randomized controlled trial evaluating predictors of skill acquisition in virtual reality laparoscopy. World J Surg. 2011; 35: 480-6.
12. Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M,. The concept of flow. In:, Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, (eds). Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. pp. 79-105.
13. Mahmood T, Darzi A,. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1224-30. (Pubitemid 39014863)
14. Choy I, Fecso A, Kwong J, Jackson T, Okrainec A,. Remote evaluation of laparoscopic performance using the global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 378-83.
15. Grantcharov TP, Schulze S, Kristiansen VB,. The impact of objective assessment and constructive feedback on improvement of laparoscopic performance in the operating room. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 2240-3. (Pubitemid 350125950)
16. Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R, Tully A, Sorensen JL, Dalsgaard T, et al. Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 1460-6. (Pubitemid 44451264)
17. Vapenstad C, Hofstad EF, Bo LE, Chmarra MK, Kuhry E, Johnsen G, et al. Limitations of haptic feedback devices on construct validity of the LapSim® virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 1386-96.
18. Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C,. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn. 1995; 28: 39-58.
19. Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, Mckeachie WJ,. Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq). Educ Psychol Meas. 1993; 53: 801-13.
20. Ghani JA, Deshpande SP,. Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. J Psychol. 1994; 128: 381-91.
21. Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Soerensen JL, Ottesen B,. Objective assessment of surgical competence in gynaecological laparoscopy: development and validation of a procedure-specific rating scale. BJOG. 2008; 115: 908-16. (Pubitemid 351693011)
22. Mishra A, Catchpole K, Dale T, McCulloch P,. The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 68-73.
23. Crossley J, Marriott J, Purdie H, Beard JD,. Prospective observational study to evaluate NOTSS (Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons) for assessing trainees′; non-technical performance in the operating theatre. Br J Surg. 2011; 98: 1010-20.
24. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ,. Second-year medical students′ motivational beliefs, emotions, and achievement. Med Educ. 2010; 44: 1203-12.
25. Webster J, Trevino L,. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Comp Hum Behav. 1993; 9: 411-26.
26. Reinhart DJ, Grum DR, Berry J, Lensch D, Marchbanks CR, Zsigmond E,. Outpatient general anesthesia: a comparison of a combination of midazolam plus propofol and propofol alone. J Clin Anesth. 1997; 9: 130-7. (Pubitemid 27125917)
27. Bridges M, Diamond DL,. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg. 1999; 177: 28-32. (Pubitemid 29088993)
28. Chiu A, Bowne WB, Sookraj KA, Zenilman ME, Fingerhut A, Ferzli GS,. The role of the assistant in laparoscopic surgery: important considerations for the apprentice-in-training. Surg Innov. 2008; 15: 229-36.
29. Shavell VI, Abdallah ME, Shade GH Jr, Diamond MP, Berman JM,. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009; 16: 22-7.