Cell fates as attractors: Stability and flexibility of cellular phenotypes

Endothelial Biomedicine

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1767-1779

  Huang, Sui ^a  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928854778     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511546198.191     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Hsiao LL, Dangond F, Yoshida T, et al. A compendium of gene expression in normal human tissues. Physiol Genomics. 2001;7 (2):97-104. Epub 2001 Oct 02.
2. Ross DT, Scherf U, Eisen MB, et al. Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat Genet. 2000; 24(3):227-235.
3. Chi JT, Chang HY, Haraldsen G, et al. Endothelial cell diversity revealed by global expression profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(19):10623-10628.
4. Barnes CM, Huang S, Kaipainen A, et al. Evidence by molecular profiling for a placental origin of hemangioma. Submitted.
5. Ho M, Yang E, Matcuk G, et al. Identification of endothelial cell genes by combined database mining and microarray analysis. Physiol Genomics. 2003;13(3):249-262.
6. Aird WC. Endothelial cell heterogeneity: a case for nature and nurture. Blood. 2004;103(11):3994.
7. Odom DT, Zizlsperger N, Gordon DB, et al. Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors. Science. 2004;303(5662):1378-1381.
8. Khorasanizadeh S. The nucleosome: from genomic organization to genomic regulation. Cell. 2004;116(2):259-272.
9. Arney KL, Fisher AG. Epigenetic aspects of differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(Pt 19):4355-4363.
10. Kubicek S, Jenuwein T. A crack in histone lysine methylation. Cell. 2004;119(7):903-906.
11. Lomvardas S, Thanos D. Opening chromatin. Mol Cell. 2002; 9(2):209-211.
12. Georgopoulos K. Haematopoietic cell-fate decisions, chromatin regulation and ikaros. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(3):162-174.
13. Huang S. Regulation of cellular states in mammalian cells from a genome-wide view. In: Gene Regulation and Metabolism: Post-Genomic Computational Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002:181-220.
14. Huang S, Ingber DE. Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. Exp CellRes. 2000;261(1):91-103.
15. Evan GI, Brown L, Whyte M, Harrington E. Apoptosis and the cell cycle. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995;7(6):825-834.
16. Huang S, Ingber DE. The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1(5):E131-E138.
17. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, et al. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science. 1997;276(5317):1425-1428.
18. Southan C. Has the yo-yo stopped? An assessment of human protein-coding gene number. Proteomics. 2004;4(6):1712-1726.
19. Koshland DE Jr, Goldbeter A, Stock JB. Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems. Science. 1982;217 (4556):220-225.
20. Paulsson J, Berg OG, Ehrenberg M. Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(13):7148-7153.
21. Savageau MA. Michaelis-Menten mechanism reconsidered: implications of fractal kinetics. J Theor Biol. 1995;176(1):115-124.
22. Huang S. Genomics, complexity and drug discovery: insights from Boolean network models of cellular regulation. Pharma-cogenomics. 2001;2(3):203-222.
23. Zingg JM, Pedraza-Alva G, Jost JP. MyoD1 promoter autoregulation is mediated by two proximal E-boxes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(12):2234-2241.
24. Chen H, Ray-Gallet D, Zhang P, et al. PU.1 (Spi-1) autoregu-lates its expression in myeloid cells. Oncogene. 1995;11(8):1549-1560.
25. Ohneda K, Yamamoto M. Roles ofhematopoietic transcription factors GATA-1 and GATA-2 in the development of red blood cell lineage. Acta Haematol. 2002;108(4):237-245.
26. Grass JA, Boyer ME, Pal S, et al. GATA-1-dependent transcriptional repression of GATA-2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain-wide chromatin remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(15):8811-8816.
27. Nerlov C, Querfurth E, Kulessa H, Graf T. GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription. Blood. 2000;95(8):2543-2551.
28. Zhang P, Zhang X, Iwama A, et al. PU.1 inhibits GATA-1 function and erythroid differentiation by blocking GATA-1 DNA binding. Blood. 2000;96(8):2641-2648.
29. Ruzinova MB, Benezra R. Id proteins in development, cell cycle and cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13(8):410-418.
30. Hu M, Krause D, Greaves M, et al. Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. Genes Dev. 1997;11(6):774-785.
31. Enver T, Greaves M. Loops, lineage, and leukemia. Cell. 1998;94 (1):9-12.
32. Akashi K, He X, Chen J, et al. Transcriptional accessibility for genes ofmultiple tissues and hematopoietic lineages is hierarchically controlled during early hematopoiesis. Blood. 2003;101(2): 383-389.
33. Bruno L, Hoffmann R, McBlane F, et al. Molecular signatures of self-renewal, differentiation, and lineage choice in multipotential hemopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24(2):741-756.
34. Vogel G. Stem cells. “Sternness” genes still elusive. Science. 2003; 302(5644):371.
35. Rubin H. On the nature of enduring modifications induced in cells and organisms. Am J Physiol. 1990;258(2 Pt 1):L19-L24.
36. Monod J, Jacob F. Teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth, and differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp QuantBiol. 1961;26:389-401.
37. Thomas R. Logical analysis of systems comprising feedback loops. J Theor Biol. 1978;73(4):631-656.
38. Cinquin O, Demongeot J. Positive and negative feedback: striking a balance between necessary antagonists. J Theor Biol. 2002; 216(2):229-241.
39. Cherry JL, Adler FR. How to make a biological switch. J Theor Biol. 2000;203(2):117-133.
40. Angeli D, Ferrell JE Jr, Sontag ED. Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(7):1822-1827.
41. Gardner TS, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2000;403(6767):339-342.
42. Bhalla US, Ram PT, Iyengar R. MAP kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling network. Science. 2002;297(5583):1018-1023.
43. Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Lim HN, et al. Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli. Nature. 2004;427 (6976):737-740.
44. Xiong W, Ferrell JE. A positive-feedback-based bistable “memory module” that governs a cell fate decision. Nature. 2003; 426(6965):460-465.
45. Huang S. Back to the biology in systems biology: what can we learn from biomolecular networks. Brief Funct Genomic Pro-teomic. 2004;2(4):279-297.
46. Callaway DS, Hopcroft JE, Kleinberg JM, et al. Are randomly grown graphs really random? Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001;64(4 Pt 1):041902.
47. Kauffman SA. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J Theor Biol. 1969;22(3):437-467.
48. Kauffman SA. The Origins of Order. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
49. Shmulevich I, Lahdesmaki H, Dougherty ER, et al. The role of certain post classes in Boolean network models of genetic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(19):10734-10739.
50. Fox JJ, Hill CC. From topology to dynamics in biochemical networks. Chaos. 2001;11(4):809-815.
51. Aldana M, Cluzel P. A natural class of robust networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(15):8710-8714.
52. Harris SE, Sawhill BK, Wuensche A, Kauffman SA. A model of transcriptional regulatory networks based on biases in the observed regulation rules. Complexity. 2002;7(4):23-40.
53. Huang S, Eichler GS, Bar-Yam Y, Ingber DE. Cell fate as highdimensional attractor of a complex gene regulatory network. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94(12):12871.
54. Huang S. Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and drug discovery. J Mol Med. 1999;77(6):469-480.