Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide

BMC Microbiology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Stiefel, Philipp ^a   Schmidt Emrich, Sabrina ^a   Maniura Weber, Katharina ^a   Ren, Qun ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bacterial live dead cells; Propidium iodide; SYTO9; Viability staining

Indexed keywords

PROPIDIUM IODIDE; REAGENT; SYT09; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; FLUORESCENT DYE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; SYTO 9;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL VIABILITY; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; CELL ASSAY; CELL COUNT; CELL VIABILITY; CELL VIABILITY ASSAY; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; BLEACHING; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STAINING; STANDARDS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

FLUORESCENT DYES; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PHOTOBLEACHING; PROPIDIUM; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAINING AND LABELING; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 84928675022     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barer MR, Harwood CR. Bacterial viability and culturability. Adv Microb Physiol. 1999;41:93-137.
2. Heinmets F, Taylor WW, Lehman JJ. The Use of metabolites in the restoration of the viability of heat and chemically inactivated escherichia-coli. J Bacteriol. 1954;67(1):5-12.
3. Bogosian G, Bourneuf EV. A matter of bacterial life and death. EMBO Rep. 2001;2(9):770-4.
4. Trevors JT. Can dead bacterial cells be defined and are genes expressed after cell death? J Microbiol Meth. 2012;90(1):25-8.
5. Gregori G, Citterio S, Ghiani A, Labra M, Sgorbati S, Brown S, et al. Resolution of viable and membrane-compromised bacteria in freshwater and marine waters based on analytical flow cytometry and nucleic acid double staining. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(10):4662-70.
6. Shi L, Gunther S, Hubschmann T, Wick LY, Harms H, Muller S. Limits of propidium iodide as a cell viability indicator for environmental bacteria. Cytom Part A. 2007;71A(8):592-8.
7. Boulos L, Prevost M, Barbeau B, Coallier J, Desjardins R. LIVE/DEAD (R) BacLight (TM): application of a new rapid staining method for direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water. J Microbiol Meth. 1999;37(1):77-86.
8. Virta M, Lineri S, Kankaanpaa P, Karp M, Peltonen K, Nuutila J, et al. Determination of complement-mediated killing of bacteria by viability staining and bioluminescence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(2):515-9.
9. Berney M, Hammes F, Bosshard F, Weilenmann HU, Egli T. Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(10):3283-90.
10. Hoefel D, Grooby WL, Monis PT, Andrews S, Saint CP. Enumeration of water-borne bacteria using viability assays and flow cytometry: a comparison to culture-based techniques. J Microbiol Methods. 2003;55(3):585-97.
11. Lu J, Turnbull L, Burke CM, Liu M, Carter DA, Schlothauer RC, et al. Manuka-type honeys can eradicate biofilms produced by Staphylococcus aureus strains with different biofilm-forming abilities. PeerJ. 2014;2:e326.
12. Hoerr V, Ziebuhr W, Kozitskaya S, Katzowitsch E, Holzgrabe U. Laser-induced fluorescence - capillary electrophoresis and fluorescence microplate reader measurement: Two methods to quantify the effect of antibiotics. Anal Chem. 2007;79(19):7510-8.
13. Leuko S, Legat A, Fendrihan S, Stan-Lotter H. Evaluation of the LIVE/DEAD BacLight kit for detection of extremophilic archaea and visualization of microorganisms in environmental hypersaline samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(11):6884-6.
14. Auty MA, Gardiner GE, McBrearty SJ, O'Sullivan EO, Mulvihill DM, Collins JK, et al. Direct in situ viability assessment of bacteria in probiotic dairy products using viability staining in conjunction with confocal scanning laser microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(1):420-5.
15. Waring MJ. Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids. J Mol Biol. 1965;13(1):269-82.
16. Arndt-Jovin DJ, Jovin TM. Fluorescence labeling and microscopy of DNA. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;30:417-48.
17. Stocks SM. Mechanism and use of the commercially available viability stain. BacLight Cytometry A. 2004;61(2):189-95.
18. Herskovits TT, Gadegbeku B, Jaillet H. On the structural stability and solvent denaturation of proteins. I Denaturation by the alcohols and glycols. J Biol Chem. 1970;245(10):2588-98.
19. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):147-79.
20. Taghi-Kilani R, Gyurek LL, Millard PJ, Finch GR, Belosevic M. Nucleic acid stains as indicators of Giardia muris viability following cyst inactivation. Int J Parasitol. 1996;26(6):637-46.
21. Terzieva S, Donnelly J, Ulevicius V, Grinshpun SA, Willeke K, Stelma GN, et al. Comparison of methods for detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms collected by liquid impingement. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(7):2264-72.
22. Langsrud S, Sundheim G. Flow cytometry for rapid assessment of viability after exposure to a quaternary ammonium compound. J Appl Bacteriol. 1996;81(4):411-8.
23. Duffy G, Sheridan JJ. Viability staining in a direct count rapid method for the determination of total viable counts on processed meats. J Microbiol Meth. 1998;31(3):167-74.
24. Ruger M, Bensch G, Tungler R, Reichl U. A flow cytometric method for viability assessment of Staphylococcus aureus and Burkholderia cepacia in mixed culture. Cytom Part A. 2012;81A(12):1055-66.
25. Strauber H, Muller S. Viability states of bacteria-specific mechanisms of selected probes. Cytometry Part A. 2010;77(7):623-34.
26. Tawakoli PN, Al-Ahmad A, Hoth-Hannig W, Hannig M, Hannig C. Comparison of different live/dead stainings for detection and quantification of adherent microorganisms in the initial oral biofilm. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(3):841-50.
27. Müsken M, Di Fiore S, Romling U, Haussler S. A 96-well-plate-based optical method for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and its application to susceptibility testing. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(8):1460-9.
28. Barbesti S, Citterio S, Labra M, Baroni MD, Neri MG, Sgorbati S. Two and three-color fluorescence flow cytometric analysis of immunoidentified viable bacteria. Cytometry. 2000;40(3):214-8.
29. Lehtinen J, Nuutila J, Lilius EM. Green fluorescent protein-propidium iodide (GFP-PI) based assay for flow cytometric measurement of bacterial viability. Cytom Part A. 2004;60A(2):165-72.
30. Benoit MR, Conant CG, Ionescu-Zanetti C, Schwartz M, Matin A. New device for high-throughput viability screening of flow biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(13):4136-42.