Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 592-594

  Craik, Johnathan D ^a   El Shafie, Sherif A ^b   Singh, Vinay K ^a   Twyman, Roy S ^a  

^a EPSOM AND ST HELIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b Elective Orthopaedic Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee; Oxford; Revision; Unicompartmental

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; BONE IMPLANT; DISEASE COURSE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; STEMMED IMPLANT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; AGED; ARTHRITIS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGISTER; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84928323872     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.038     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Laurencin C.T., Zelicof S.B., Scott R.D., et al. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 273:151.
2. Newman J., Pydisetty R.V., Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement. The 15 year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:52. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.
3. Saldanha K.A.N., Keys G.W., Svard U.C.G., et al. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty - results of a multicentre study. Knee 2007, 14:275. 10.1016/j.knee.2007.03.005.
4. Lombardi A.V., Berend K.R., Walter C.A., et al. Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:1450. 10.1007/s11999-009-0731-z.
5. Price A.J., Rees J.L., Beard D.J., et al. Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10years. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:590. 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.082.
6. Levine W.N., Ozuna R.M., Scott R.D., et al. Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:797.
7. Ackroyd C.E. Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2003, 85:937.
8. Johnson S., Jones P., Newman J.H. The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee 2007, 14:154. 10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.012.
9. Pearse A.J., Hooper G.J., Rothwell A., et al. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010, 92-B:508. 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22659.
10. Ellams D., Forsyth O., Mistry A., et al. 7th Annual report 2010, National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
11. Lewold S., Robertsson O., Knutson K., et al. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998, 69:469.
12. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA 2009.
13. Baker P.N., Van der Meulen J.H., Lewsey J., et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007, 89:893.
14. Berend K.R., George J., Lombardi A.V. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty conversion: assuring a primary outcome. Orthopedics 2009, 32(9). 10.3928/01477447-20090728-32.
15. Jones H.W., Chan W., Harrison T., et al. Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement: similar to a primary?. Knee 2012, 19:339. 10.1016/j.knee.2011.03.006.
16. Chou D.T.S., Swamy G.N., Lewis J.R., et al. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement. Knee 2012, 19:356. 10.1016/j.knee.2011.05.002.
17. Rancourt M., Kemp K.A.R., Plamondon S.M.R., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties revised to total knee arthroplasties compared with primary total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:106. 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.021.
18. Järvenpää J., Kettunen J., Miettinen H., et al. The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop (SICOT) 2009, 34:649. 10.1007/s00264-009-0811-4.
19. Chakrabarty G., Newman J.H., Ackroyd C.E. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:191.
20. Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lewold S., et al. The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001, 83:45.