Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: The New Zealand National Joint Registry

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 508-512

  Pearse, A J ^a,b   Hooper, G J ^a   Rothwell, A ^a   Frampton, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b WRIGHTINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISEASE FREE INTERVAL; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SECOND LOOK SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CHILD; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950601128     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22659     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Rajasekhar C, Das S, Smith A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:983-985
2. Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 2001;392:272-278
3. Svard UCG, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001 ;83-B:191-194
4. Johnson S, Jones P, Newman JH. The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee 2007;14:154-157 (Pubitemid 46275452)
5. Martin JG, Wallace DA, Woods DA, Carr AJ, Murray DW. Revision of unicondylar knee replacements to total knee replacement. Knee 1995;2:121-125
6. Saldanha KA, Keys GW, Svard UC, White SH, Rao C. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: results of a multi-centre study. Knee 2007;14:275-279 (Pubitemid 47043451)
7. Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991;73-A:186-190
8. No authors listed. New Zealand Joint Registry, New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr (date last accessed 27 October 2008).
9. No authors listed. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Dept. of Orthopedics, Lund University Hospital. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/ uploadFiles/111-VK2008Eng11.pdf (date last accessed 27 October 2008).
10. No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2008. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr (date last accessed 27 October 2008).
11. No authors listed. Report 2007 - Centre of excellence of joint replacements. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. http://www.haukeland.no.nrl (date last accessed 27 October 2008).
12. Parette S, Argenson JN, Pearce O, et al. Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:351-356
13. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1010-1014 (Pubitemid 47492792)
14. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:1037-1041 (Pubitemid 41820991)
15. Newman J, Pydisetty RB, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:52-57
16. Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Frampton C. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B: 413-418
17. Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:469-474
18. McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;392:279-282
19. Rand JA, Bryan RS. Results of revision total knee arthroplasties using condylar prostheses: a review of fifty knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70-A:738-745
20. Dudley TE, Gioe TJ, Sinner P, Mehle S. Registry outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions. Clin Orthop 2008;466:1666-1670
21. Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2008;79:499-507.