Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement: Similar to a primary?

Knee

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 339-343

  Wynn Jones, Henry ^a   Chan, Warwick ^a   Harrison, Timothy ^a   Smith, Toby O ^b   Masonda, Patrick ^b   Walton, Neil P ^a  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical outcomes; Revision; Technical issues; Total knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL INFECTION; TIBIA FRACTURE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84861664315     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Laurencin C.T., Zelicof S.B., Scott R.D., Ewald F.C. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 273:151-156.
2. Rougraff B.T., Heck D.A., Gibson A.E. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 273:157-164.
3. Willis-Owen C.A., Brust K., Alsop H., Miraldo M., Cobb J.P. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee 2009, 16:473-478.
4. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 6th Annual Report 2009.
5. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O'Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:983-989.
6. Pandit H., Jenkins C., Barker K., Dodd C.A., Murray D.W. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:54-60.
7. Keys G.W., Ul-Abiddin Z., Toh E.M. Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement from a small district hospital in UK. Knee 2004, 11:375-377.
8. Svard U.C., Price A.J. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:191-194.
9. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2008, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Adelaide.
10. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. Annual Report 2006.
11. Ackroyd C.E. Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:937-942.
12. Chakrabarty G., Newman J.H., Ackroyd C.E. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:191-196.
13. Chatain F., Richard A., Deschamps G., Chambat P., Neyret P. Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2004, 90:49-57.
14. Martin J.G., Wallace D.A., Woods D.A., Carr A.J., Murray D.W. Revision of unicondylar knee replacements to total knee replacement. Knee 1995, 2:121-125.
15. McAuley J.P., Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:279-282.
16. Saldanha K.A., Keys G.W., Svard U.C., White S.H., Rao C. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty - results of a multicentre study. Knee 2007, 14:275-279.
17. Aleto T.J., Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Meneghini R.M. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:159-163.
18. Padgett D.E., Stern S.H., Insall J.N. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73:186-190.
19. Springer B.D., Scott R.D., Thornhill T.S. Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:214-220.
20. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:63-69.
21. Liow R.Y., Walker K., Wajid M.A., Bedi G., Lennox C.M. Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics 2003, 26:143-149.
22. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34:220-233.
23. Carr A., Keyes G., Miller R., O'Connor J., Goodfellow J. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993, 295:205-213.
24. O'Connor J., Goodfellow J., Imran A. Kinematics and Mechanics of the knee with application to unicompartmental replacement and the pathomechanics of anteromedial arthritis. Unicompartmental Arthroplasty 1997, 61:12-26.
25. Tregonning R., Rothwell A., Hobbs T., Hartnett N. Early failure of the Oxford phase 3 cemented medial uni-compartmental knee joint arthroplasty: an audit of the NZ joint registry over six years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 91:339. (Suppl. II).
26. Hui C., Salmon L.J., Kok A., Williams H.A., Hockers N., van der Tempel W.M., et al. Long-term survival of high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2011, 39:64-70.
27. Dettoni F., Bonasia D.E., Castoldi F., Bruzzone M., Blonna D., Rossi R. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J 2010, 30:131-140.
28. Amendola L., Fosco M., Cenni E., Tigani D. Knee joint arthroplasty after tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 2010, 34:289-295.
29. Levine W.N., Ozuna R.M., Scott R.D., Thornhill T.S. Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:797-801.
30. Mont M.A., Antonaides S., Krakow K.A., Hungerford D.S. Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299:125-130.
31. Windsor R.E., Insall J.N., Vince K.G. Technical considerations of total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988, 70:547-555.
32. Katz M.M., Hungerford D.S., Krackow K.A., Lennox D.W. Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987, 69:225-233.
33. Jackson M., Sarangi P.P., Newman J.H. Revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9:539-542.
34. Ridgeway S.R., McAuley J.P., Ammeen D.J., Engh G.A. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84:351-355.
35. Emerson R.H., Hansborough T., Reitman R.D., Rosenfeldt W., Higgins L.L. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 404:62-70.
36. Hopgood P., Martin C.P., Rae P.J. The effect of tibial implant size on postoperative alignment following medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 2004, 11:385-388.
37. O'Connor J.J., Goodfellow J.W., Dodd C.A., Murray D.W. Clinical application of meniscal unicompartmental arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2007, 221:47-59.
38. Smith T.O., Hing C.B., Davies L., Donell S.T. Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009, 95:599-605.
39. Baker P.N., van der Meulen J.H., Lewsey J., Gregg P.J. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:893-900.
40. Gleeson R.E., Evans R., Ackroyd C.E., Webb J., Newman J.H. Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study. Knee 2004, 11:379-384.
41. Pinskerova V., Johal P., Nagagawa S., Sosna A., Williams A., Gedroyc W., et al. Does the femur roll back with flexion?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:925-931.
42. Li M.G., Yao F., Ioppolo J., Nivbrant B., Wood D. Mobile vs. Fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a randomized study on short-term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee 2006, 13:365-370.
43. Confalonieri N., Manzotti A., Pullen C. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score. Knee 2004, 11:357-362.
44. Tibrewal S., Grant K., Goodfellow J. The radiolucent line beneath tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984, 66:523-528.
45. Gulati A., Chau R., Pandit H.G., Gray H., Price A.J., Dodd C.A., Murray D.W. Incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartment arthroplasty and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:896-902.
46. Mukherjee K., Pandit H., Dodd C., Ostlere S., Murray D.W. The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective. Clin Radiol 2008, 63:1169-1176.