Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 467, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1450-1457

  Lombardi Jr , Adolph V ^a,b,c,d   Berend, Keith R ^a,b,d   Walter, Christopher A ^e   Aziz Jacobo, Jorge ^a   Cheney, Nicholas A ^f  

^a Joint Implant Surgeons Inc   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Ohio State University   (United States)

^d MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e Grandview Hospital Orthopedic Residency Program   (United States)

^f Doctors Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; BODY MASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEVICE; FEMALE; GENDER; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONVALESCENCE; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BODY MASS INDEX; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 66349131008     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0731-z     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. CE Ackroyd SL Whitehouse JH Newman CC Joslin 2002 A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84 667 672 12188481 10.1302/0301-620X.84B5. 12404 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjtFKhtw%3D%3D
2. TJ Aleto ME Berend MA Ritter PM Faris RM Meneghini 2008 Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision J Arthroplasty. 23 159 163 18280406 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.020 (Pubitemid 351226502)
3. AK Amin JT Patton RE Cook M Gaston IJ Brenkel 2006 Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty? Results from a matched study Clin Orthop Relat Res. 451 101 106 16760806 10.1097/01.blo.0000224052.01873.20 (Pubitemid 44511313)
4. DJ Beard DW Murray JL Rees AJ Price CA Dodd 2002 Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement-a feasibility study Knee. 9 221 224 12126681 10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00016-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zot1GrsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34765713)
5. KR Berend AV Lombardi Jr 2007 Liberal indications for minimally invasive oxford unicondylar arthroplasty provide rapid functional recovery and pain relief Surg Technol Int. 16 193 197 17429788
6. KR Berend AV Lombardi Jr TH Mallory 2004 Rapid recovery protocol for peri-operative care of total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients Surg Technol Int. 13 239 247 15744696
7. RA Berger DD Nedeff RM Barden MM Sheinkop JJ Jacobs AG Rosenberg JO Galante 1999 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup Clin Orthop Relat Res 367 50 60 10546598 10.1097/00003086- 199910000-00007
8. J Dawson R Fitzpatrick D Murray A Carr 1998 Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 63 69 9460955 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.7859 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7itVymsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28048491)
9. RV Deshmukh RD Scott 2002 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view Clin Orthop Relat Res. 404 108 112 12439247 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00019
10. N Fisher M Agarwal SF Reuben DS Johnson PG Turner 2006 Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee. 13 296 300 16809040 10.1016/j.knee.2006.03.004 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28vgsFemtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43975387)
11. MA Hassaballa AJ Porteus ID Learmonth 2007 Functional outcomes after different types of knee arthroplasty: Kneeling ability versus descending stairs Med Sci Monit. 13 77 81
12. MA Hassaballa AJ Porteus JH Newman 2004 Observed kneeling ability after total, unicompartmental and patellofemoral knee arthroplasty: perception versus reality Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 12 136 139 12897983 10.1007/s00167-003-0376-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7jtFyktw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40883826)
13. MA Hassaballa AJ Porteus JH Newman CA Rogers 2003 Can knees kneel? Kneeling ability after total, unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty Knee. 10 155 160 12787999 10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00148-5 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3s3mt1CqtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36629206)
14. GP Hopper WJ Leach 2008 Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 16 973 979 18696051 10.1007/s00167-008-0596-9
15. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott 1989 Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res. 248 13 14 2805470
16. I Jahromi NP Walton PJ Dobson PL Lewis DG Campbell 2004 Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision Int Orthop. 28 286 289 15480659 10.1007/s00264-004-0573-y 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crhtVektw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39506405)
17. NP Kort JJ van Raay J Cheung C Jolink R Deutman 2007 Analysis of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the minimally invasive technique in patients aged 60 and above: an independent prospective series Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 15 1331 1334 17684726 10.1007/s00167-007-0397-6
18. E Koskinen A Eskelinen P Paavolainen P Pulkkinen V Remes 2008 Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 50, 493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register Acta Orthop. 79 499 507 18766483 10.1080/17453670710015490
19. SC Kozinn R Scott 1989 Unicondylar knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 71 1 145 150 2643607 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7gvFansw%3D%3D
20. CT Laurencin SB Zellicof RD Scott FC Ewald 1991 Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study Clin Orthop Relat Res. 273 151 156 1959264
21. AV Lombardi Jr AJ Viacava KR Berend 2006 Rapid recovery protocols and minimally invasive surgery help achieve high knee flexion Clin Orthop Relat Res. 452 117 122 16957640 10.1097/01.blo.0000238824.56024.7a (Pubitemid 44690654)
22. A Manzotti N Confalonieri C Pullen 2007 Unicompartmental versus computer-assisted total knee replacement for medial compartment knee arthritis: a matched pair study Int Orthop. 31 315 319 16896871 10.1007/s00264-006-0184-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szgt1Ogtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46800759)
23. DW Murray JW Goodfellow JJ O'Connor 1998 The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 983 989 9853489 10.1302/0301-620X.80B6.8177 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmvVekug%3D%3D
24. FD Naal M Fischer A Preuss J Goldhahn F von Knoch S Preiss U Munzinger T Drobny 2007 Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Am J Sports Med. 35 1688 1695 17557876 10.1177/ 0363546507303562 (Pubitemid 47476057)
25. JH Newman CE Ackroyd NA Shah 1998 Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 862 865 9768899 10.1302/0301-620X.80B5.8835 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjvFygtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28457081)
26. DW Pennington JJ Swienckowski WB Lutes GN Drake 2003 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85 1968 1973 14563806
27. AJ Price CA Dodd UG Svard DW Murray 2005 Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 1488 1492 16260664 10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16324 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2Mrot1OitQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41723090)
28. AJ Price JC Waite U Svard 2005 Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 435 171 180 15930935 10.1097/00003086-200506000-00024 (Pubitemid 40798659)
29. AJ Price J Webb H Topf CA Dodd JW Goodfellow DW Murray 2001 Oxford Hip and Knee Group. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision J Arthroplasty. 16 970 976 11740750 10.1054/arth.2001.25552 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptFygug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33151871)
30. C Rajasekhar S Das A Smith 2004 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86 983 985 15446523 10.1302/0301-620X.86B7.15157 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvnvVCisw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39255861)
31. KA Reilly DJ Beard KL Barker CA Dodd AJ Price DW Murray 2005 Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-a randomized controlled trial Knee. 12 351 357 15994082 10.1016/j.knee.2005.01. 002 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvnvVOrtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41247988)
32. O Robertsson L Borgquist K Knutson S Lewold L Lidgren 1999 Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative 15, 437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10, 624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses Acta Orthop Scand. 70 170 175 10366919 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3psV2qtw%3D%3D
33. O Robertsson K Knutson S Lewold L Lidgren 2001 The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41, 223 knees operated on in 1988-1997 Acta Orthop Scand. 72 503 513 11728079 10.1080/000164701753532853 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnot1SrtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33043591)
34. BT Rougraff DA Heck AE Gibson 1991 A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis Clin Orthop Relat Res. 273 157 164 1959265
35. KJ Saleh KJ Mulhall B Bershadsky HM Ghomrawi LE White CM Buyea KA Krackow 2005 Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 1985 1994 16140813 10.2106/JBJS.D.02564 (Pubitemid 41279129)
36. SH Stern MW Becker JN Insall 1993 Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria Clin Orthop Relat Res. 286 143 148 8425335
37. UC Svärd AJ Price 2001 Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series J Bone Joint Surg Br. 83 191 194 11284563 10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.10966
38. OB Tabor Jr OB Tabor 1998 Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study J Arthroplasty. 13 373 379 9645516 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90001-8 (Pubitemid 28270394)
39. OB Tabor Jr OB Tabor M Bernard JY Wan 2005 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term success in middle-age and obese patients J Surg Orthop Adv. 14 59 63 16115429
40. NP Walton I Jahromi PL Lewis PJ Dobson KR Angel DG Campbell 2006 Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Knee Surg. 19 112 116 16642887
41. AE Weale OA Halabi PW Jones SH White 2001 Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements Clin Orthop Relat Res. 382 143 153 11153982 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00021
42. AE Weale DW Murray R Crawford V Psychoyios A Bonomo G Howell J O'Connor JW Goodfellow 1999 Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after 'Oxford' medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Br. 81 783 789 10530837 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9197 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlvVChsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29438351)
43. KY Yang MC Wang SJ Yeo NN Lo 2003 Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty-early results of a matched-pair comparison Singapore Med J. 44 559 565 15007494 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7hslKiug%3D%3D