The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the national joint registry for England and Wales

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 89, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 893-900

  Baker, P N ^a   van der Meulen, J H ^b   Lewsey, J ^c   Gregg, P J ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 34548259911     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rothwell PM, McDowell Z, Wong CK, Dorman PJ. Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patient's and doctor's perceptions and assessment of disability in multiple sclerosis. BMJ 1997;314:1580-3.
2. Janse AJ, Gemke RJ, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:653-61.
3. Bullens PH, Van Loon CJ, De Waal Malefijit MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:740-7.
4. Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DWC, Suarez-Almazor ME. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Clin Geriatr Med 2005;21:527-41.
5. Anderson JG, Wixson RL, Tsai D, Stulberg SD, Chang RW. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:831-40.
6. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998;80-A:163-73.
7. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:262-7.
8. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Patridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1998;356:93-110.
9. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: Summary Report the 2nd Annual Report. September 2005. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk (date last accessed 5 April 2007).
10. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perception of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:63-9.
11. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MGE, Charlson ME. Patient's expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:387-96.
12. Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, Elmstedt E. Patients expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:457-62.
13. Mahomed NH, Liang MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatology 2002;29:1273-9.