Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Revised to Total Knee Arthroplasties Compared With Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 8 SUPPL., 2012, Pages 106-110

  Rancourt, Marie France ^a   Kemp, Kyle A R ^a   Plamondon, Sarah M R ^a   Kim, Paul R ^a   Dervin, Geoffrey F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Revision knee arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE GRAFT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OXFORD MEDIAL UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84865364119     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Newman J., Pydisetty R., Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:52.
2. Lombardi A., Berend K., Walter C., et al. Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:1450.
3. Price A., Rees J., Beard D., et al. Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:590.
4. Johnson S., Jones P., Newman J. The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee 2007, 14:154.
5. Pearse A., Hooper G., Rothwell A., et al. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:508.
6. Saldanha K., Keys G., Svard U., et al. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty-results of a multicentre study. Knee 2007, 14:275.
7. Mercier N., Wimsey S., Saragaglia D. Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2010, 34:1137.
8. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O'Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:983.
9. Price A., Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:174.
10. Robertsson O., Bizjajeva S., Fenstad A., et al. Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:82.
11. Koskinen E., Eskelinen A., Paavolainen P., et al. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish. Arthroplasty Register 2008, 79:499.
12. Kuipers B., Kollen B., Bots P., et al. Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement. Knee 2009, 17:48.
13. W-Dahl A., Robertsson O., Lidgren L., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:90.
14. Newgard C., Hedges J., Arthur M., et al. Advanced statistics: the propensity score-a method for estimating treatment effect in observational research. Acad Emerg Med 2004, 11:953.
15. Parsons L. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. Presented at SUGI 26 2001, SASÒ Users Group International (SUGI), Long Beach, CA.
16. Bellamy N., Buchannan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988, 15:95.
17. Charlson M., Szatrowski T.P., Peterson J., et al. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 1994, 47:1245.
18. SKAR (Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register). Annual report 2010. Lund, Sweden (). http://www.knee.se.
19. Dervin G., Carruthers C., Feibel R., et al. Initial experience with the oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:192.
20. Goodfellow J., O'Connor J., Murray D. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92:1628.
21. Jones H., Chan W., Harrison T., et al. Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement: similar to a primary?. Knee 2011, 1.
22. Chou D., Swamy G., Lewis J., et al. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement. Knee 2011, 1.
23. Berend K., George J., Lombardi A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty conversion: assuring a primary outcome. Orthopedics 2009, 32:684.
24. Escobar A., Quintana J., Bilbao A., et al. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 2007, 15:273.
25. Järvenpää J., Kettunen J., Miettinen H., et al. The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients. Int Orthop 2010, 34:649.
26. Robertsson O., Dunbar M. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:476.
27. Hang J., Stanford T., Graves S., et al. Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:95.