Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy

Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy

Volumn 9780521871907, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-232

  Peräkylä, Anssi ^a   Vehviläinen, Sanna ^a   Antaki, Charles ^b   Leudar, Ivan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928281174     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490002     Document Type: Book

References (274)

1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1959). Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Antaki, C. (2004). Reading minds or dealing with interactional implications? Theory and Psychology, 14, 667-683.
3. Antaki, C., Barnes, R. & Leudar, I. (2004). Trouble in agreeing on a client’s problem in a cognitive behavioural therapy session. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Aplicata: Studying Social Interaction: The Contribution of Conversation Analysis, 4, 129-140.
4. Antaki, C., Barnes, R. & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies, 7, 627-647.
5. Antaki, C., Barnes, R. & Leudar, I. (2007). Members’ and analysts’ interests: “formulations” and “interpretations” in psychotherapy. In A. Hepburn & S. Wiggins (eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction (pp. 166-181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Arminen, I. (1998). Therapeutic interaction. A study of mutual help in the meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous. The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies (Vol. 45). Helsinki.
7. Arminen, I.2004. Second stories: the salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 319-347.
8. Arminen, I. 2004. Institutional interaction. Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.
9. Arminen, I. & Leppo, A. (2001). The dilemma of two cultures in the 12-step treatment. The professional responses for clients who act against their best interests. In M. Seltzer, C. Kullberg, S. P Olesen & I. Rostila (eds.), Listening to the welfare state (pp. 183-212). Aldershot: Ashgate.
10. Aron, L. (1991). The patient’s experience of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1 (1), 29-51.
11. Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale: Analytic Press.
12. Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix-xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Avis, J. M. (2006). Escaping narratives of domination: Ideas for clinical practice with women oppressed by relationship violence. In R. Alaggia & C. Vine (eds.), Cruel but not unusual: Violence in Canadian families: A sourcebook for educators and practitioners (pp. 397-421). Waterloo, Ontario Canada: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
14. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Balint, M. & Balint, E. (1961). Psychotherapeutic techniques in medicine. London: Tavistock.
16. Beach, W. A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and official priorities in medical interviews. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Chenial (eds.), The talk of the clinic (pp. 259-290). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
17. Beach, W. A. & Dixson, C. N. (2001). Revealing moments: formulating understandings of adverse experiences in a health appraisal interview. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 25-44.
18. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. R., Shaw, B. R. & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.
19. Benjamin, J. (1990). Recognition and destruction: an outline of intersubjectivity. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7 (suppl.), 33-47.
20. Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the other. New York: Routledge.
21. Benjamin, L. S. (1996). Introduction to the special section on Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1203-1212.
22. Bercelli, F., Rossano, F. & Viaro, M. (forthcoming). Clients’ personal narratives in psychotherapy: The interactional accomplishment of different tasks in two different sequential placements. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), Text & talk, special issue on narratives.
23. Bercelli, F., Viaro, M. & Rossano, F. (2004). Attività in alcuni generi di psicoterapia. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Aplicata, 4 (2-3), 111-127.
24. Berg, M. (2001). Syytoksia ja epailyksia. Toimittajan ja poliitikon vuorovaikutuk- sesta televisiokeskustelussa. [Accusations and suspicions. On interaction between journalists and politicians in televised conversation.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
25. Bergmann, J. (1992). Veiled morality: notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 137-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Bergmann, J. (2001). Refocusing other on the other’s self. A paper presentation in “Psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic,” Workshop in Helsinki, Finland, 9-11 August 2001.
27. Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419-451.
28. Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in Groups. New York: Basic Books.
29. Bion, W. R. (1984). Elements of psychoanalysis. London: Carnac books.
30. Boden, D. & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Talk and social structure. Cambridge: Polity.
31. Boesky, D. (1982). Acting out: a reconsideration of the concept. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63, 39-55.
32. Bongar, B. & Beutler, L. E. (1995). Comprehensive textbook of psychotherapy theory and practice. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Brodbeck, H. (1995). The psychoanalyst as participant and observer in the psychoanalytic process: Some thoughts on countertransference from a constructivist perspective. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 18, 531-558.
34. Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Nahum, J. P., Sander, L. W et al. (Boston Change Process Study Group, CPSG) (2002). Explicating the implicit: the local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 1051-1062.
35. Bucci, W. (1995). The power of narrative. A multiple code account. In J. Pennebaker (ed.), Emotion, disclosure and health (pp. 93-103). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Busch, F. (1995). Do actions speak louder than words? A query into an enigma in analytic theory and technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43, 61-82.
37. Buttny, R. (1996). Clients’ and therapist’s joint construction of the clients’ problems. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29 (2), 125-153.
38. Button, G. (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 217-231). Cambridge: Polity.
39. Byrne, P. S. & Long, B. E. L. (1976). Doctors talking to patients: A study of the verbal behaviours of doctors in the consultation. London: HMSO.
40. Chasseguet-Smirgel, J. (1990). On acting out. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 77-86.
41. Clayman, S. (1993). Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering questions in news interviews and press conferences. Text, 13 (2), 159-188.
42. Clayman, S. & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Corey, G. (1986). Theory and practice of counselling and psychotherapy (3rd edn). Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
44. Davies, P., Thomas, P & Leudar, I. (1999). The dialogical engagement with voices. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 72, 179-187.
45. Davis, K. (1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 8, 44-74.
46. Denton, E. (2006). Negotiating anger and agency, responsibility, and change: Discourse-analysis of narrative therapy for men who have abused their intimate partners. Unpublished masters thesis. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph.
47. Dersley, I. & Wootton, A. (2000). Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 375-406.
48. Descartes, R. (1911). Meditations on first philosophy. The philosophical works of Descartes. (E. S. Haldane & G. R. T. Ross, trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1641.)
49. de Shazer, S. & Berg, I. K. (1985). A part is not apart: Working with only one of the partners present. In A. S. Gurman (ed.), Casebook of marital therapy (pp. 97110). New York: Guilford Press.
50. Deutsch, H. (1926). Okkulte Vorgänge während der Psychoanalyse. Imago, 12, 418-433.
51. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470-520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31,295-325.
53. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 66-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. (1985). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
55. Dryden, W. (ed.) (2007). Dryden’s handbook of individual therapy. London: Sage.
56. Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: An analysis of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211-247.
57. Edwards, D. (1995). Two to tango: Formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28 (4), 319-350.
58. Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7, 5-29.
59. Ehrlich, S. & Sidnell, J. (2006). “I think that’s not an assumption you ought to make”: Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony. Language in Society, 35, 655-676.
60. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart.
61. Ferenczi, S. & Rank, O. (1924). Entwicklungsziele der Psychoanalyse. Zur wechselbeziehungvon Theorie und Praxis. Wien: Internationaler psychoanalytischer Verlag.
62. Ferrara, K. W. (1994). Therapeutic ways with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Ferro, A. (2002). Narrative derivatives of alpha elements. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 11, 184-187.
64. Fonagy, P. (1999). Memory and therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80, 215-221.
65. Forrester, M. & Reason, D. (2006). Conversation analysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy research: questions, issues, problems and challenges. Psycho – analytic Psychotherapy, 20 (1), 40-64.
66. Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and civilization. A history of insanity in the age of reason. London: Tavistock.
67. Edwards, D. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.
68. Freedman, J. & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York: Norton.
69. Freud, S. (l905). Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. In Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7, pp. 7-122). London: Hogarth Press.
70. Freud, S. (1909). Two case histories “Little Hans” and the “Rat Man.” In Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 10). London: Hogarth Press.
71. Freud, S. (1916-1917). Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. GW (Vol. 11, p. 10). Frankfurt: Fischer.
72. Freud, S. (1937): Constructions in analysis. In Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 255-269). London: Hogarth Press.
73. Freud, S. and Breuer, J. (1991). Fräulein Anna O. In S. Freud, Studies on hysteria (pp. 73-102). London: Penguin (Original work published 1985).
74. Fromm-Reichman, F. (1967). Principles of intensive psychotherapy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
75. Frosh, S. (2002). Key concepts in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press.
76. Gabbard, G. O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 475-485.
77. Gale, J. (1991). Conversation analysis of therapeutic discourse: Pursuit of a therapeutic agenda. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
78. Garcia, A. (1991). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review, 56, 818-835.
79. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
80. Garfinkel, H. & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (eds.), Theoretical Sociology (pp. 337-366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
81. Goffman, E. (1963). Behaviour in public places. Glencoe: The Free Press.
82. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
83. Goldberg, A. (2002). Enactment as understanding and as a misunderstanding. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50, 869-883.
84. Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Context, activity and participation. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 79-99). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
85. Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, C. (1999). Emotion within situated activity. In N. Budwig, I. C. Uzgiris & J. V. Wertsch (eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 33-54). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
86. Green, G. (1996). Pragmatics and natural language understanding (2nd edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Greenson, R. R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
88. Guidano, V. (1987). The complexity of the self. New York: Guilford Press.
89. Guidano, V. (1991). The self in process. Toward a post-rationalist cognitive theory. New York: Guilford Press.
90. Hak, T. & de Boer, F. (1996). Formulations in first encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 83-99.
91. Hakulinen, A. (1987). Avoiding personal reference in Finnish. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertucelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective, 141-153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
92. Hakulinen, A. & Karlsson, F. (1979). Nykysuomen lauseoppi. [The syntax of Finnish.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
93. Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. & Alho, I.(2003). Iso suomen kielioppi. [Comprehensive grammar of Finnish.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
94. Haley, J. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton.
95. Halonen, M. (2002). Kertominen terapian valineena. Tutkimus vuorovaikutuksestamyl- lyhoidon ryhmaterapiassa. [Telling as a therapeutic device. A study of interaction in Minnesota model group therapy.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
96. Halonen, M. (2006). Life stories used as evidence for the diagnosis of addiction in group therapy. Discourse & Society, 17, 283-298.
97. Helasvuo, M. (2006). Passive: Personal or impersonal? A Finnish perspective. In M. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (pp. 233-255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
98. Helasvuo, M. & Laitinen, L. (2006). Person in Finnish: Paradigmatic and syntag- matic relations in interaction. In M. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (pp. 173- 207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
99. Heritage, J. (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Heritage, J. (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
101. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. A. Van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 95-117). London: Academic Press.
102. Heritage, J. & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. Heritage, J. & Lindstrom, A. (1998). Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 397-438.
104. Heritage, J. & Maynard, D. W. (eds.) (2006). Communication in medical care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15-38.
106. Heritage, J. & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359-417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107. Heritage J. & Sorjonen M-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1-29.
108. Heritage, J. & Watson, R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language (pp. 123-162). New York: Irvington Press.
109. Heritage, J. & Watson, R. (1980). Aspects of the properties of formulations. Semiotica, 30 (3/4), 245-262.
110. Hester, S. & Francis, D. (2000). Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and “institutional talk.” Text, 20, 391-413.
111. Hoffman, I. Z. (1992). Some practical implications of a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2, 287-304.
112. Holloway, E. L., Freund, R. D., Gardner, S. L., Lee Nelson, M. & Walker, B. R. (1989). Relation of power and involvement to theoretical orientation in supervision: An analysis of discourse. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 88-102.
113. Horowitz, L., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G. & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.
114. Hoyt, M. F. (ed.) (1994). Constructive therapies. New York: Guilford Press.
115. Hoyt, M. F. (2002). Solution-focused couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman & N. S. Jacobson (eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (3rd edn., pp. 335-369). New York: Guilford Press.
116. Hutchby, I. (1992). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. Hutchby, I. (1995). Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes, 19, 219-238.
118. Hutchby, I. (2002). Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: Aspects of the utterance “I don’t know.” Discourse Studies, 4, 147-168.
119. Hutchby, I. (2003). “Active listening”: Formulations and the elicitation of feeling-talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38 (3), 303-329.
120. Hutchby, I. (2007). The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
121. Ikonen, P (2000). Psykoanalyyttisia tutkielmia. [Psychoanalytic studies.] Helsinki: Nuorisopsykoterapia-saatio.
122. Jacobs, T. (1986). On countertransference enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34, 289-307.
123. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 86-100). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
124. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418-441.
125. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 14-31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
126. Jefferson, G. & Lee, J. (1992). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles-telling” and a “service encounter.” In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 521548). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
127. Johnson, V. E. (1973). I’ll quit tomorrow. New York: Harper & Row.
128. Jones, C. M. & Beach, W. A. (1995). Therapists’ techniques for responding to unsolicited contributions by family members. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Chenail (eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
129. Jones, E. E. (1997). Models of therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78, 1135-1150.
130. Kantrowitz, J. L. (1995). The beneficial aspects of the patient-analyst match. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 299-313.
131. Katz, G. A. (1998). Where the action is: The enacted dimension of analytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 46, 1129-1167.
132. Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction. Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate?: A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175-200.
134. Kinnell, A-M-K. & Maynard, D. (1996). The delivery and receipt of safer sex advice in pretest counselling sessions for HIV and AIDS. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24 (4), 405-437.
135. Klein, M. (1975). Narrative of a child analysis: The conduct of the psycho-analysis of children as seen in the treatment of a ten-year-old boy. London: Hogarth Press.
136. Klein, M. (1998a). Envy and gratitude and other works. London: Virago.
137. Klein, M. (1998b). Love, guilt and reparation. London: Virago.
138. Klüwer, R. (1983). Agieren und Mitagieren. Psyche, 37, 828-840.
139. Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speaker. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1083-1110.
140. Kurhila, S. (2004). Different Orientations to Grammatical Correctness. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 143-158). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
141. Kurri, K. & Wahlstrom, J. (2007). Reformulations of agentless talk in psychotherapy. Text & Talk, 27 (4), 315-338.
142. Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. Orlando: Academic Press.
143. Laitinen, L. (2006). Zero person in Finnish construction. In M. Helasvuo & L. Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish (pp. 233-258). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
144. Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J. B. (1973). The language of psycho-analysis. The International Psychoanalytical Library, 94, 1-497.
145. Laundergan, J. C. (1982). Easy does it. USA: Hazelden Foundation.
146. Lea, S. & Auburn, T. (2001). The social construction of rape in the talk of a convicted rapist. Feminism and Psychology, 11, 11-33.
147. Leiman, M. & Stiles, W. B. (2001). Dialogical sequence analysis and the zone of proximal development as conceptual enhancements to the assimilation model: The case of Jan revisited. Psychotherapy Research, 11, 311-330.
148. Leiman, M. & Stiles, W. B. (2002). Integration of theory: Methodological issues. In I. Sâfvestad-Nolan & P. Nolan (eds.), Object relations and integrative psychotherapy: Tradition and innovation in theory and practice (pp. 68-79). London: Whurr Publishers.
149. Lerner, G. (1991). On the syntax of sentences in progress. Language in Society, 20, 441-458.
150. Leudar, I. Antaki, C. & Barnes, R. (2006). When psychotherapists disclose personal information about themselves to clients. Communication and Medicine, 3, 27-41.
151. Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (1996). Situating action IV: Planning as situated action. Ecological Psychology, 8, 153-170.
152. Leudar, I. & Costall, A. (2004). On the persistence of the “problem of other minds” in psychology: Chomsky, Grice and “theory of mind.” Theory and Psychology, 14, 601-621.
153. Leudar, I., Sharrock, W, Colombino, T., Truckle, S., Hope, K. & Simon, S. (2005). How does it work? – Don’t count, look! The Bulletin of the Association of Child Psychotherapists, 152, 12-15.
154. Leudar, I. & Thomas, P. (2000). Voices of reason, voices of insanity. Studies of verbal hallucinations. London: Routledge.
155. Levine, H. B., Friedman, R. J. (2000). Intersubjectivity and interaction in the analytic relationship: A mainstream review. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 69, 63-92.
156. Levinson, S. C. (1981). The essential inadequacies of speech act models of dialogue. In H. Parret, M. Sbisa & J. Verschueren (eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics (pp. 473-492). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
157. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
158. Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human “interactional engine.” In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and human interaction (pp. 39-69). Oxford: Berg.
159. Lipchik, E. (2002). Beyond technique in solution-focused therapy: Working with the emotions and the therapeutic relationship. New York: Guilford Press.
160. Luborsky, L. & Crits-Christoph, P (1997). Understanding transference: The core conflictural relationship theme method. Washington: American Psychological Association Press.
161. Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P, Mintz, J. & Auerbach, A. (1988). Who will benefit from psychotherapy? Predicting therapeutic outcomes. New York: Basic Books.
162. Luborsky, L. & Luborsky, E. (1995). The era of measures of the transference – The CCRT and other measures. In T. Shapiro & R. Emde (eds.), Research inpsychoanalysis. Process, development, outcome (pp. 329-351). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
163. Madill, A., Widdicombe, S. & Barkham, M. (2001). The potential of conversation analysis for psychotherapy research. Counselling Psychologist, 29, 413-434.
164. Makela, K., Arminen, I., Bloomfield, K., Eisenbach-Stangl, I., Hermansson Bergmark, K., Kurube, N. et al. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous as a mutual-help movement. A study in eight societies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
165. Maynard, D. (1991). The Perspective-Display Series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure. Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 164-192). Cambridge: Polity.
166. Maynard, D.W and Frankel, R. (2006). On diagnostic rationality: Bad news, good news, and the symptom residue. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (eds.), Communication in medical care. Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 248-278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
167. Maynard, D. and Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction and medical communication. Medical Education, 39, 428-435.
168. McGee, D., Del Vento, A. & Bavelas, J. B. (2005). An interactional model of questions as therapeutic interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 371-384.
169. McLaughlin, J. T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 595-614.
170. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
171. Miller, G. & Silverman, D. (1995). Troubles talk and counseling discourse: A comparative study. Sociological Quarterly, 36, 725-747.
172. Miller, W. R. & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing. Preparing people to change addictional behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
173. Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
174. Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality. From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
175. Moore, R. J. & Maynard, D. W. (2002). Achieving understanding in the Standardized Survey Interview: Repair sequences. In H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N. Cate Schaeffer & J. van der Zouwen (eds.), Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview (D. W. Maynard, ed., pp. 281-311). New York: Wiley.
176. Nevin, B. (1994). Quandary/abusive questions. The Linguist Discussion List, 5, 754.
177. Nicholson, S. (1995). The narrative dance: A practice map for White’s therapy. Australian/New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 16, 23-28.
178. Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3-19.
179. Ogden, T. H. (1997). Reverie and interpretation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 56, 567-595.
180. O’Hanlon, W H. (1993). Possibility therapy: From iatrogenic injury to iatrogenic healing. In S. Gillian & R. Price (eds.), Therapeutic conversations (pp. 3-21). New York: Norton.
181. Perakyla, A. (1995). AIDS counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
182. Perakyla, A. (2004a). Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: a conversation analytic view. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 289-307.
183. Perakyla, A. (2004b). Two traditions of interaction research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 1-20.
184. Perakyla, A. (2005). Patients’ responses to interpretations: A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory. Communication & Medicine, 2 (2), 163-176.
185. Perakyla, A. & Ruusuvuori, J. (2006). Facial expression in an assessment. In H. J. Knoblauch, J. Raab, G-H. Soeffner, B. Schnettler (eds.), Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology (pp. 127-142). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
186. Perakyla, A., Ruusuvuori, J. & Lindfors, P. (2007). What is patient participation: reflections arising from the study of general practice, homeopathy and psychoanalysis. In S. Collins, N. Britten, J. Ruusuvuori & A. Thompson (eds.), Patient Participation in Health Care Consultations (pp. 121-142). Buckingham: Open University Press.
187. Perakyla, A., Ruusuvuori, J. & Vehvilainen, S. (2005). Introduction: Professional theories and institutional interaction. Communication & Medicine, 2, 105-109.
188. Perakyla, A. & Silverman, D. (1991). Owning experience: Describing the experience of other persons. Text, 11,441-480.
189. Perakyla, A. & Vehvilainen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society, 14, 727-750.
190. Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F. & Danehy, J. J. (1961). The firstfive minutes. A sample of microscopic interview analysis. Ithaca, NY: Paul Martineau.
191. Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). New York: Academic Press.
192. Perakyla, A. (1980). Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186-198.
193. Perakyla, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dis- preferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Actions (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
194. Perakyla, A. (1985). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229.
195. Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality. London: Sage.
196. Perakyla, A. (1997). Beyond cognitivism. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 119-128.
197. Rabin, H. M. (1995). The liberating effect on the analyst of the paradigm shift in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 12, 467-481.
198. Rae, J. (2005). Achieving a therapeutic stance: Some resources for responding selectively to a client’s talk. International Pragmatics Association Conference, Riva del Garda, Italy.
199. Rawls A. W. (2002). Editor’s introduction. In H. Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology’s program. Working out Durkheim’s aphorism (A. W Rawls ed., pp. 1-64). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
200. Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
201. Robinson, J. D. (2001). Closing medical encounters: two physician practices and their implications for the expression of patients’ unstated concerns. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 639-656.
202. Robinson, J. D. (2003). Soliciting patients’ presenting concerns. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (eds.), Communication in medical care. Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 22-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
203. Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
204. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves. Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
205. Roughton, R. E. (1994). Repetition and interaction in the analytic process: Enactment, acting out, and collusion. TheAnnualof Psychoanalysis, 22,271-286.
206. Ruusuvuori, J. (2005). “Empathy” and “sympathy” in action: Attending to patients’ troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 204-222.
207. Rycroft, C. (1995). A critical dictionary of psychoanalysis (2nd edn.). London: Penguin.
208. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
209. Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions of sociolinguistics (pp. 325-345). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
210. Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337-353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
211. Sacks, H. (1984). On doing “being ordinary.” In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413-429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
212. Sacks, H. (1985). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 5469). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
213. Sacks, H. (1992a). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1, G. Jefferson, ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
214. Sacks, H. (1992b). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2, G. Jefferson, ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
215. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
216. Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 3, 43-47.
217. Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 35-45.
218. Sandler, J., Dare, C. & Holder, A. (1992). The patient and the analyst. The basis of the psychoanalytic process. London: Karnac.
219. Sandlund, E. (2004). Feeling by doing. The social organization of everyday emotions in academic talk-in-interaction. Karlstad: Karlstad University Studies 2004, 36.
220. Scheflen, A. (1973). Communicational structure. Analysis of a psychotherapy transaction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
221. Schegloff, E. A. (1963). Towards a reading of psychiatric theory. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 8, 61-91.
222. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: Free Press.
223. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
224. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44-709). Cambridge: Polity.
225. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
226. Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161-216.
227. Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn-organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
228. Schegloff, E. A. (2003). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
229. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
230. Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E. & Thompson, S. (1996). Introduction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 1-51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
231. Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
232. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
233. Schwaber, E. A. (1998). The non-verbal dimension in psychoanalysis: “State” and its clinical vicissitudes. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 667-678.
234. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: a conversation analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
235. Seppanen, E. (2000). Sina ja suomalaiset: Yksikon toisen persoonanyleistavasta kaytosta. [You and the Finns. About the generic use of the second person.] Kielikello, 3, 16-18.
236. Shore, S. (1988). On the so-called Finnish passive. Word, 39, 151-176.
237. Silverman, D. (1997). Discourses of counselling. HIV counselling as social interaction. London: Sage.
238. Solms, M. (1995). Is the brain more real than the mind? Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 9, 107-120.
239. Sorjonen, M-L. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
240. Spacal, S. (1990). Free association as a method of self-observation in relation to other methodological principles of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59, 1990.
241. Stern, D. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York: Norton.
242. Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C. et al. (1998). Non interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy. The “something more” than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903-921.
243. Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk. A taxonomy of verbal response modes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
244. Stiles, W. B. (1999). Signs and voices in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 1-21.
245. Stiles, W. B. (2002). Assimilation of problematic experiences. In J. C. Norcross (ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 357-365). New York: Oxford University Press.
246. Stiles, W. B., Elliott, R., Llewelyn, S. P, Firth-Cozens, J. A., Margison, F. R., Shapiro, D. A. et al. (1990). Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 411-420.
247. Stiles, W B. & Shapiro, D. A. (1994). Disabuse of the drug metaphor: psychotherapy process-outcome correlations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 942-948.
248. Stiles W. B., Shapiro, D. A. & Firth-Cozens, J. A. (1988). Verbal response mode use in contrasting psychotherapies: a within-subjects comparison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 727-733.
249. Stivers, T. (2005). Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: One resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision. Health Communication, 181 (1), 41-74.
250. Streeck, U. (2001). “Ja, genau, genau.” Bestätigungen als Versuche des Patienten, die Kompetenz des Psychotherapeuten als eigene zu deklarieren. Eine gesprächsanalytische Untersuchung. Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft, 2, 74-94.
251. Streeck, U. (2004). Auf den ersten Blick. Psychotherapeutische Beziehungen unter dem Mikroskop. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
252. Tausk, V. (1933). On the origin of the “influencing machine” in schizophrenia. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 2, 519-556.
253. Thomä, H. & Kächele, H. (1994). Psychoanalytic practice I: Principles. Northvale: Jason Aronson.
254. Treurniet, N. (1997). On an ethic of psychoanalytic technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 66, 596-627.
255. Tronick, E. Z., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Nahum, J. P. et al. (1998). Dyadically expanded states of consciousness and the process of therapeutic change. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 290-299.
256. Tuomikoski, R. (1971). Persoona, tekijä ja henkilö. [Person, agent and individual.] Virittäjä, 75, 146-152.
257. Vehviläinen, S. (1999). Structures of counselling interaction. A conversation analytic study of counselling encounters in career guidance training. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
258. Vehviläinen, S. (2003a). Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction. Text, 23, 573-606.
259. Vehviläinen, S. (2003b). Topicalizing the patient’s emotion in psychoanalytic interaction. Paper presented at the Communication, Medicine & Ethics (COMET) conference, University of Cardiff, 26-28 June 2003.
260. Viaro, M., Leonardi, P. (1983). Getting and giving information: Analysis of a family interview strategy. Family Process, 22, 27-42.
261. Voutilainen, L. (in preparation) Conversation analysis of cognitive-constructivist psychotherapy. PhD thesis in preparation, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.
262. Wallerstein, R. S. (1990). The common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71,3-20.
263. Waring, H. Z. (2005). Peer tutoring in a graduate writing centre: Identity, expertise and advice resisting. Applied Linguistics, 26, 141-168.
264. Wessely S. (2001). Randomised controlled trials, the gold standard? In C. Mace, S. Moorey & B. Roberts (eds.), Evidence in the psychological therapies (pp. 46-60). London: Brunner-Routledge.
265. West, C. (2006). Coordinating closings of primary care visits: producing continuity of care. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (eds.), Communication in medical care. Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 313-339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
266. White, A. R. (1979). Shooting, killing and fatally wounding. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, new series 80 (pp. 1-16).
267. White, D. (1993). Deconstruction and therapy. In S. Gillian & R. Price (eds.), Therapeutic conversations (pp. 22-61). New York: Norton.
268. Winch, P. (1972). Understanding a primitive society. In P. Winch, Ethics and Action (pp. 78-111). London: RKP
269. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
270. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
271. Wittgenstein, L. Wong, J. (2005). Sidestepping grammar. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 159-173). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
272. Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected. The organization of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
273. Wootton, A. (1977). Some notes on the organization of talk in a therapeutic community. Sociology, 11 (2), 333-350.
274. Zimmerman, D. (1992). The interactional organisation of calls for emergency assistance, in P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.