Introduction: Professional theories and institutional interaction

Communication and Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 105-109

  Peräkylä, Anssi ^a   Ruusuvuori, Johanna ^b   Vehviläinen, Sanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL MEDICINE; CONVERSATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; FAMILY THERAPY; HEALTH CARE; HOMEOPATHY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 27644473230     PISSN: 16121783     EISSN: 16133625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/come.2005.2.2.105     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Arminen, I. and Leppo, A. (2000). The dilemma of two cultures in twelve-step treatment: Professionals' responses to clients who act against their best interests. In Listening to the Welfare State, M. Seltzer, C. Kullberg, S. P. Olesen, and I. Rostila (eds.), 183-212. Aldershot: Ashgate.
2. Balint, M. (1957). The Doctor, the Patient and the Illness. London: Pitman.
3. Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10 (4): 543-558.
4. Drew, P. (2001). Spotlight on the patient. TEXT 21 (1/2): 261-268.
5. Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: an introduction. In Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.), 1-42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hak, T. (1999). 'Text' and 'con-text': talk bias in studies of healthcare work. In Talk, Work and Institutional Order, S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds.), 427-452. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Heath, C. (1997) The analysis of activities in face-to-face interaction using video. In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, D. Silverman (ed.), 183-200. London: Sage.
10. Maynard, D. (1984). Inside Plea Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation. New York: Plenum.
11. Maynard, D. (2003). Bad News, Good News. Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12. Peräkylä, A. and Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society 14 (6): 727-750.
13. Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (1999). Introduction: Revisiting different analytic frameworks. In Talk, Work and Institutional Order, S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds.), 389-400. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In Talk at Work, P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), 101-134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8 (2): 165-187.
16. Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Schegloff's texts as 'Billig's data': a critical reply. Discourse and Society 10 (4): 558-572.
17. Silverman, D. (1999). Warriors or collaborators: reworking methodological controversies in the study of institutional interaction. In Talk, Work and Institutional Order, S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds.), 401-426. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
19. Whalen, J. (1995) A technology of order production: computeraided dispatch as a support system in real-world environments. In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Order of Talk and Embodied Activities, P. ten Have and G. Psathas (eds.), 197-230. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
20. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9 (3): 387-412.