Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction

Text

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 573-606

  Vehviläinen, Sanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Confrontation; Formulation; Interpretation; Psychoanalytic interaction; Therapeutic interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147144191     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.2003.022     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) (1992 [1984]). Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. Buttny, R. (1996). Client's and therapist's joint construction of the client's problems. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (2): 125-153
3. Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F. E., and Kernberg, O. (1999). Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality. New York: John Wiley and Sons
4. Davis, K. (1986). The process of problem re(formulation) in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health and Illness 8 (1): 44-74
5. Drew, P. (1998). An exercise in the comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different (institutional) settings: The case of formulations. In Samtalsstudier. Meddelanden från Institutionen fõr nordiska språk och nordisk litteratur vid Helsingfors universitet, B:19 [Conversation studies. Publications of the Institution of Nordic languages and Nordic literature, University of Helsinki B: 19], H. Lehti-Eklund (ed.), 29-12. Helsinki: University of Helsinki
6. Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds.) (1992). Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Gill, M. M. and Hoffman, I. Z. (1982). Analysis of Transference. Vol. II. Studies of Nine Audio-Recorded Psychoanalytic Sessions. (Psychological Issues, Monograph 54.) New York: International Universities Press
8. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelpia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press
9. Grossen, M. and Apothéloz, D. (1996). Communicating about communication in a therapeutic interview. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15: 101-132
10. Hak, T. and De Boer, F. (1996). Formulations in first encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 83-99
11. Halonen, M. (2001). Terapeutti elāmäkerran tulkitsijana myllyhoidon ryhmäterapiassa [The therapist as an interpreter of biography in the group therapy of the Minnesota model treatment]. In Institutionaalinen vuorovaikutus. Keskustelunanalyyttisia tutkimuksia [Institutional interaction. Conversation analytic studies], J. Ruusuvuori, M. Haakana, and L. Raevaara (eds. ), 62-81. Helsinki: SKS
12. Halonen, M. (2002). Kertominen terapian välineenä. Tutkimus vuorovaikutuksesta myllyhoidon ryhmäterapiassa [Telling as therapy. Interaction in the Minnesota model group therapy]. Helsinki: SKS
13. Helasvuo, M-L. (2002). Yhteiskonstruktiot: Kieltenvälinen näkökulma keskustelun syntaktiseen rakentumiseen. Esitelmā Keskusteluntutkimuksen päivillä, Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus [A presentation of co-constructions from an interlinguistic perspective; National meeting of Conversation Analysis, Research Centre of Domestic Languages], Helsinki, Finland, 10-11 January 2002
14. Heritage, J. (1985). Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol 3., T. van Dijk (ed.), 95-119. New York: Academic Press
15. Heritage, J. and Watson, R. (1979). Formulations as Conversational Objects. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, G. Psathas (ed.), 123-162. London: Wiley
16. Hutchby, I. (1996). Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse and Society 7 (4): 481-497
17. Kellermann, P. (1992). Focus on Psychodrama. The Therapeutic Aspects of Psychodrama. London: Jessica Kingsley
18. Kivivuori, J. (1992). Psykokulttuuri [Psychoculture]. Tampere: Hanki ja jää
19. Kächele, H. and Thomä, H. (1992). Psychoanalytic Practice. (Clinical Studies 2.) Berlin: Springer-Verlag
20. Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press
21. Lahti, R. (2001). Ammatinvalinnanohjaajien vastauksia asiakkaiden tiedostamattomiin odotuksiin. Transferenssi-ilmiöiden merkitys ohjauksen vuorovaikutuksen ja tulosten näkökulmasta [Career counsellors' responses to clients' unconscious expectations. The meaning of transference phenomena from the perspective of interaction and effect]. Työpoliittinen tutkimus 227 [Studies in Labour Policy 227]. Helsinki: Työministeriö
22. Lehtinen, E. (2002). Raamatun puhuttelussa: teksli, kokemus ja vuorovaikutus adventistien raamatunlutkistelussa [Text, experience and interaction in an adventist bible group]. (Acta Universitatis Tamporensis 891.) Tampere: Tampere University Press
23. Levinson, S. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In Erving Goffman. Exploring the Interaction Order, P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds.), 161-227. Cambridge: Polity Press
24. Malan, D. H. (1979). Individual Psychotherapy and the Science of Psychodynamics. London: Butterworths
25. Masson, J. (1992). The tyranny of psychotherapy. In Psychotherapy and Its Discontents, W. Dryden and C. Feltham (eds.), 7-29. Buckingham: Open University Press
26. Ono, T. and Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: Collaboration, overlap and syntactic dissociation. In Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues, E. H. Hovy and D. R. Scott (eds.), 67-96. Springer: Berlin
27. Parker, I. (1997). Psychoanalytic Culture: Psychoanalytic Discourse in Western Society. London: Sage
28. Perākylā, A. (to appear). Describing the patient's experience in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytical perspective. Psychotherapy Research
29. Peräkylä, A. and Silverman, D. (1991). Owning experience: Describing the experience of other persons. Text 11 (3): 441-430
30. Peräkylä, A. and Vehviläinen, S. (2001). Interpretative sequences and the analyst's interpretative contributions. A paper presented at 'Language and Therapeutic Interaction: An International Conference', 30-31 August 2001, Brunei University, Uxbridge, West London
31. Raussi, A. (1992). Että-partikkelilla alkavat lausumat keskustelussa. Pro gradu -tyō. Hehingin yliopiston suomen kielen laitos [Utterances beginning with the että particle]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish Language
32. Rycroft, C. (1995 [1968]). A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. London: Penguin
33. Sacks, H. (1992 [1984]). On doing 'being ordinary'. In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, (eds.), 413-429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
34. -(1995a). Lectures in Conversation, vol. I. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell
35. -(1995b). Lectures in Conversation, vol. II. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell
36. Sandler, J., Dare, C, and Holder, A. (1992). The Patient and the Analyst. The Basis of the Psychoanalytic Process. London: Karnac
37. Sorjonen, M-L. (2001). Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
38. Strean, H. S. (1985). Therapeutic Principles in Practice. A Manual for Clinicians. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
39. Tainio, L. (ed.) (1997). Keskustelunanalyysin perusteet [The basics of conversation analysis]. Tampere: Vastapaino
40. Tähkä, V. (1997). Mielen rakentuminen ja psykoanalyyttinen hoitaminen [The mind and its treatment: A psychoanalytic approach]. Juva, Finland: WSOY
41. Vehviläinen, S. (2001). Free association as an interactional accomplishment: Topic management and topic intitial elicitors in classical psychoanalytic interaction. A paper presented at the workshop 'Using discursive psychology and conversation analysis in the study of institutional interaction', Tampere, 6-8 June 2001