Two traditions of interaction research

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-20

  Peräkylä, Anssi ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b Department of Sociology ^*  (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18244426476     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466604322915953     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysts: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-167). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
3. Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New Brunswick: Transaction.
4. Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. with assistance from S. A. Williamson (1977). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
5. Bales, R. F. & Couch, A. S. (1969). The value profile: A factor analytic study of value statements. Sociological Inquiry, 39, 3-17.
6. Bales, R. F., & Slater, P. E. (1956). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family-socialization and interaction process (pp. 259-306). London: Routledge.
7. Billig, M. (1998). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10, 543-558.
8. Boyd, E. (1998). Bureaucratic authority in the 'company of equals': The interactional management of medical peer review. American Sociological Review, 63, 200-224.
9. Bull, P. E., & Roger, D. B. (1988). The social psychological approach to interpersonal communication. In D. B. Roger & P. E. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 9-20). Bristol: Multilingual matters.
10. Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage.
11. Carter, W. B., Inui, T. S., Kukul, W., & Haigh, V. (1982). Outcome-based doctor-patient inter-action analysis. II. Identifying effective provider and patient behavior. Medical Care, 20, 550-566.
12. Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002) Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Elsenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749-775.
13. Clayman, S., & Maynard, D. (1995). Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In P. T. Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 1-30). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
14. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (1996). Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and prosodic perspective on interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 11-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Davis, M. S. (1971). Variation in patient compliance with doctors' orders: Medical practice and doctor-patient interaction. Psychiatry in Medicine, 2, 31-54.
16. Drew, P. (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 21-48). Hemel Hemstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
17. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
18. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
19. Ekman, P., & Rosenberg, E. (Eds.) (1998). What the face reveals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Eskola, A. (1961). Social influence and power in two-person groups. Turku: Westermarck Society.
21. Freemon, B., Negrete, V. F., Davis, M., & Korsch, B. M. (1971). Gaps in doctor-patient communication: Doctor-patient interaction analysis. Pediatric Research, 5, 295-299.
22. Freese, J., & Maynard, D. (1998). Prosodic features of bad news and good news in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 195-219.
23. Fridlund, A. J. & Duchaine, B. (1996). 'Facial expressions of emotion' and the delusion of the hermetic self. In R. Harré & W. G. Parrott (Eds.), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions (pp. 259-284). London: Sage.
24. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Gill, V. (1998). Doing attributions in medical interactions: Patients' explanations for illness and doctors' responses. Social Psychology Quarterly 61, 342-360.
26. Ginsburg, G. P. & Harrington, M. E. (1996). Bodily states and context in situated lines of action. In R. Harré & W. G. Parrott (Eds.), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions (pp. 229-258). London: Sage.
27. Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Goodwin, C. (1986). Audience, diversity, participation and interpretation. Text, 6, 283-316.
29. Goodwin, C. (1987). Unilateral departure. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee, (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 206-216). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
30. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
31. Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237-274.
32. Haakana, M. (1999). Laughing matters: A conversation analytical study of laughter in doctor-patient interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish Language.
33. Haakana, M. (2001). Laughter as a patient's resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text, 21, 187-219.
34. Harré, R., & Parrott, W. G. (Eds.) (1996). The emotions: social, cultural and biological dimensions. London: Sage.
35. Heath, C. (1988). Embarrassment and interactional organization:. In P. Drew & T. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: An interdisciplinary appreciation (pp. 136-160). Cambridge: Polity.
36. Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: The expression of suffering in the medical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 113-125.
37. Heath, C. (1992). The delivery and reception of diagnosis and assessment in the general practice consultation. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 235-267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Heritage, J. (1984a). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge; Polity.
40. Heritage, J. (1984b). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Heritage, J. (1995) Conversation analysis: Methodological aspects, In U. M. Quasthoff (Ed). Aspects of oral communication (pp. 391-416). Berlin: De Gruyter.
42. Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 110-157.
44. Heritage, J., & Roth, A. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 1-60.
45. Jefferson, G. (1980). End of Grant Report on Conversations in which 'troubles' or 'anxieties' are expressed (HR 4805/2). London: Social Science Research Council.
46. Jefferson, G. (1981). The abominable 'ne?': A working paper exploring the phenomenon of post-response pursuit of response. Occasional Paper No. 6, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester.
47. Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 346-369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Jefferson, G. (1985a). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, Volume 3 (pp. 25-34). New York: Academic Press.
49. Jefferson, G. (1985b). On the interactional unpacking of a gloss. Language in Society, 14, 435-66.
50. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35 418-441.
51. Jefferson, G., & Lee, J, R. (1992). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a 'troubles-telling' and a 'service encounter'. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 521-548). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Kendon, A. (1988). Goffman's approach to face-to-face interaction. In A. Wootton & P. Drew (Eds.), Erving Goffman; Exploring the interaction order (pp. 14-40). Cambridge: Polity.
53. Korsch, B. M., Gozzi, E, K., & Francis, V. (1968). Gaps in doctor-patient communication. I. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics, 42, 855-871.
54. Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., & Target, M. (Eds.) (2002). Outcome of psychoanalytic treatment: Perspectives for therapists and researchers. London: Whurr.
55. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Manstead, A. S. R. & Semin, G.R. (2001). Methodology in social psychology: Tools to test theories. In M. Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology. A European perspective (pp. 73-113). Oxford: Blackwell.
57. Maynard, D. (1991). Interaction and Institutional asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 448-495.
58. Maynard, D. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 93-130.
59. Maynard, D. (2003). Good news, bad news: Conversational order in everyday talk and, clinical settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. Maynard, D., & Peräkylä, A. (2003). Language and social interaction. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-257). New York: Kluwer Academic.
61. Maynard, D., & Whalen, M. (1995). Language, action, and social interaction. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 149-175). Boston: Allyn Bacon.
62. Mishler, E. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63. Peräkylä, A. (1995). AIDS counselling. Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Peräkylä, A. (1998). Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 301-320.
65. Peräkylä, A (2002). Agency and authority: Extended responses to diagnostic statements in primary care encounters. Resarch in Language and Social Interaction, 35, 219-247.
66. Peräkylä, A. (forthcoming). Communicating and responding to diagnosis. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Doing medicine: Structure and process in primary care encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
69. Psathas, G. (1994). Conversation analysis. London: Sage.
70. Raevaara, L. (1996). Patients' diagnostic utterances in Finnish doctor-patient encounters. Paper delivered at the 11th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Jyväskylä, Finland.
71. Raevaara, L. (2000). Potilaan diagnoosiehdotukset lääkärin vastaanotolla. Keskustelun-analyyttinen tutkimus potilaan institutionaalisista tehtävistä [The patient's candidate diagnoses in the medical consultation: A conversation analytical study on the patient's institutional tasks]. Helsinki: SKS.
72. Ridgeway, C. L., & Walker, H. A. (1995). Status structures. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 281-310). Boston: Allyn Bacon.
73. Roter, D. L. (1991). The Roter method of interaction process analysis: RIAS manual. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.
74. Ruusuvuori, J. (2000) Giving and receiving the reason for the visit in Finnish medical consultations. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Tampere.
75. Ruusuvuori, J. (2001). Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1093-1108.
76. Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337-353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Sacks, H. (1992a). Lectures on conversation, Vol.1 (Autumn 1964-Spring 1968). Oxford: Blackwell.
78. Sacks, H. (1992b). Lectures on Conversation, Vol.2 (Autumn 1968-Spring 1972). Oxford: Blackwell.
79. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
80. Schegloff, E. A. (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111-151.
81. Schegloff, E. A. (1992a). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.) Rethinking context: Language and interactive phenomenon (pp. 191-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Schegloff, E. A. (1992b). Introduction. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Harvey Sacks,: Lectures on Conversation (Vol.1: Autumn 1964-Spring 1968 (pp. ix-lxii)). Oxford: Blackwell.
83. Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Sequence organization. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Sociology (mimeo).
84. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8, 165-187.
85. Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41, 235-263.
86. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
87. Scherer, K. R, Ladd, R. D., & Silverman, K. E. A. (1984). Vocal cues to speaker affect: Testing two models. Journal of the Acoustics Society America, 76, 1346-1356.
88. Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. London: Sage.
89. Sorjonen, M.-L. (1999). Dialogipartikkelien tehtävistä. Virittäjä, 2/1999, 170-194.
90. Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
91. Stewart, M. A. (1983). Patient characteristics which are related to the doctor-patient interaction. Family Practice, 1, 30-36.
92. Stewart, M. A. (1984). What is a successful doctor-patient interview? A study of interactions and outcomes. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 167-175.
93. Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk. London: Sage.
94. Thomas, A. P., Bull, P. E., & Roger, D. (1982). Conversational exchange analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 141-55.
95. Wasserman, R. C, & Inui, T. (1983). Systematic analysis of clinician-patient Interactions: A critique of recent approaches with suggestions for future research. Medical Care, 21, 279-293.
96. West, C. (1984). Routine complications: Troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
97. Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of hysteria in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 141-159.
98. Zimmerman, D. H., & Boden. D. (1991). Structure-in-action: An introduction. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 3-21) Cambridge: Polity.