Repeat DNA in genome organization and stability

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 31, Issue , 2015, Pages 12-19

  Padeken, Jan ^a   Zeller, Peter ^a,b   Gasser, Susan M ^a,b  

^a FRIEDRICH MIESCHER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA STRUCTURE; DNA TRANSPOSON; FACIOSCAPULOHUMERAL MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; FRAGILE X SYNDROME; FRIEDREICH ATAXIA; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC ORGANIZATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GERM LINE; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMAN; HUNTINGTON CHOREA; LONG TERMINAL REPEAT; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPETITIVE ELEMENT; RETROPOSON; REVIEW; RNA TRANSPOSON; SOMATIC CELL; TANDEM REPEAT; TRANSPOSON; ANIMAL; DISEASES; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN GENOME; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT;

EUKARYOTA;

TRANSPOSON;

ANIMALS; DISEASE; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; GENOME; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 84928239366     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: 18790380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.03.009     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. McClintock B. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1950, 36:344-355.
2. de Koning A.P., et al. Repetitive elements may comprise over two-thirds of the human genome. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1002384.
3. Lopez Castel A., Cleary J.D., Pearson C.E. Repeat instability as the basis for human diseases and as a potential target for therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:165-170.
4. Sears K.E., et al. The correlated evolution of Runx2 tandem repeats, transcriptional activity, and facial length in carnivora. Evol Dev 2007, 9:555-565.
5. Bernard P., et al. Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science 2001, 294:2539-2542.
6. Gatchel J.R., Zoghbi H.Y. Diseases of unstable repeat expansion: mechanisms and common principles. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6:743-755.
7. Bannert N., Kurth R. The evolutionary dynamics of human endogenous retroviral families. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2006, 7:149-173.
8. Heidmann O., Heidmann T. Retrotransposition of a mouse IAP sequence tagged with an indicator gene. Cell 1991, 64:159-170.
9. Sassaman D.M., et al. Many human L1 elements are capable of retrotransposition. Nat Genet 1997, 16:37-43.
10. Smit A.F. Interspersed repeats and other mementos of transposable elements in mammalian genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999, 9:657-663.
11. La Spada A.R., Taylor J.P. Repeat expansion disease: progress and puzzles in disease pathogenesis. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:247-258.
12. Punga T., Buhler M. Long intronic GAA repeats causing Friedreich ataxia impede transcription elongation. EMBO Mol Med 2010, 2:120-129.
13. Ghorbani M., et al. Comparative (computational) analysis of the DNA methylation status of trinucleotide repeat expansion diseases. J Nucleic Acids 2013, 2013:689798.
14. Goula A.V., et al. Transcription elongation and tissue-specific somatic CAG instability. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1003051.
15. McMurray C.T. Mechanisms of trinucleotide repeat instability during human development. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:786-799.
16. Kanadia R.N., et al. A muscleblind knockout model for myotonic dystrophy. Science 2003, 302:1978-1980.
17. Pouladi M.A., Morton A.J., Hayden M.R. Choosing an animal model for the study of Huntington's disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013, 14:708-721.
18. Wang H., et al. CtIP maintains stability at common fragile sites and inverted repeats by end resection-independent endonuclease activity. Mol Cell 2014, 54:1012-1021.
19. Kato T., Kurahashi H., Emanuel B.S. Chromosomal translocations and palindromic AT-rich repeats. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2012, 22:221-228.
20. Sabouri N., Capra J.A., Zakian V.A. The essential Schizosaccharomyces pombe Pfh1 DNA helicase promotes fork movement past G-quadruplex motifs to prevent DNA damage. BMC Biol 2014, 12:101.
21. Anand R.P., et al. Chromosome rearrangements via template switching between diverged repeated sequences. Genes Dev 2014, 28:2394-2406.
22. Yang Z., et al. Apolipoprotein(a) gene enhancer resides within a LINE element. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:891-897.
23. Feschotte C., Pritham E.J. DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu Rev Genet 2007, 41:331-368.
24. Tubio J.M., et al. Mobile DNA in cancer. Extensive transduction of nonrepetitive DNA mediated by L1 retrotransposition in cancer genomes. Science 2014, 345:1251343.
25. Shukla R., et al. Endogenous retrotransposition activates oncogenic pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 2013, 153:101-111.
26. Peng J.C., Karpen G.H. H3K9 methylation and RNA interference regulate nucleolar organization and repeated DNA stability. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9:25-35.
27. Pezic D., et al. piRNA pathway targets active LINE1 elements to establish the repressive H3K9me3 mark in germ cells. Genes Dev 2014, 28:1410-1428.
28. Bulut-Karslioglu A., et al. Suv39h-dependent H3K9me3 marks intact retrotransposons and silences LINE elements in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell 2014, 55:277-290.
29. Calvi B.R., Gelbart W.M. The basis for germline specificity of the hobo transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J 1994, 13:1636-1644.
30. Laski F.A., Rio D.C., Rubin G.M. Tissue specificity of Drosophila P element transposition is regulated at the level of mRNA splicing. Cell 1986, 44:7-19.
31. Probst A.V., Almouzni G. Heterochromatin establishment in the context of genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming. Trends Genet 2011, 27:177-185.
32. Hajkova P., et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech Dev 2002, 117:15-23.
33. Seisenberger S., et al. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol Cell 2012, 48:849-862.
34. Kato Y., et al. Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum Mol Genet 2007, 16:2272-2280.
35. Kobayashi H., et al. High-resolution DNA methylome analysis of primordial germ cells identifies gender-specific reprogramming in mice. Genome Res 2013, 23:616-627.
36. Liu S., et al. Setdb1 is required for germline development and silencing of H3K9me3-marked endogenous retroviruses in primordial germ cells. Genes Dev 2014, 28:2041-2055.
37. Leung D., et al. Regulation of DNA methylation turnover at LTR retrotransposons and imprinted loci by the histone methyltransferase Setdb1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:6690-6695.
38. Santenard A., et al. Heterochromatin formation in the mouse embryo requires critical residues of the histone variant H3.3. Nat Cell Biol 2010, 12:853-862.
39. Ishizu H., Siomi H., Siomi M.C. Biology of PIWI-interacting RNAs: new insights into biogenesis and function inside and outside of germlines. Genes Dev 2012, 26:2361-2373.
40. Watanabe T., Lin H. Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression by Piwi proteins and piRNAs. Mol Cell 2014, 56:18-27.
41. Kuramochi-Miyagawa S., et al. DNA methylation of retrotransposon genes is regulated by Piwi family members MILI and MIWI2 in murine fetal testes. Genes Dev 2008, 22:908-917.
42. Sienski G., Donertas D., Brennecke J. Transcriptional silencing of transposons by Piwi and maelstrom and its impact on chromatin state and gene expression. Cell 2012, 151:964-980.
43. Di Giacomo M., et al. Multiple epigenetic mechanisms and the piRNA pathway enforce LINE1 silencing during adult spermatogenesis. Mol Cell 2013, 50:601-608.
44. Ghildiyal M., et al. Endogenous siRNAs derived from transposons and mRNAs in Drosophila somatic cells. Science 2008, 320:1077-1081.
45. Yang N., Kazazian H.H. L1 retrotransposition is suppressed by endogenously encoded small interfering RNAs in human cultured cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006, 13:763-771.
46. Lienert F., et al. Genomic prevalence of heterochromatic H3K9me2 and transcription do not discriminate pluripotent from terminally differentiated cells. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1002090.
47. Dernburg A.F., Sedat J.W., Hawley R.S. Direct evidence of a role for heterochromatin in meiotic chromosome segregation. Cell 1996, 86:135-146.
48. Peng J.C., Karpen G.H. Heterochromatic genome stability requires regulators of histone H3 K9 methylation. PLoS Genet 2009, 5:e1000435.