Digital mammography: Current capabilities and obstacles

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 2, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 759-767

  Parikh, Jay ^a,b  

^a SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b American College of Radiology   (United States)

Author keywords

Components; Digital mammography; Efficiency; Obstacles; Operations

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EQUIPMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 84928096773     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. American Cancer Society. How many women get breast cancer? Available at: http://www.cancer.org. Accessed January 20, 2005.
2. F.S. Alexander, T.J. Anderson, H.K. Brown 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomized trial of breast-cancer screening Lancet 353 1999 1903 1907
3. I. Andersson, K. Aspergren, L. Janzon Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer the Malmo mammographic screening trial BMJ 297 1988 943 948
4. I. Andersson, L. Janzon Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50 updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 1997 63 67
5. L.H. Baker Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project 5-year summary report CA Cancer J Clin 32 1982 194 225
6. O.H. Beahrs, S. Shapiro, C.R. Smart Report of the Working Group to Review the National Cancer Institute-American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects J Natl Cancer Inst 62 1979 64 709
7. N. Bjurstam, L. Bjornfeld, S.W. Duffy The Gothenburg breast screening trial first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization Cancer 80 1997 2091 2099
8. J. Frisell, E. Lidbrink, L. Hellstrom Follow-up after 11 years update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial Breast Cancer Res Treat 45 1997 263 270
9. M.M. Roberts, F. Alexander, T.J. Anderson Edinburgh trial of screening of breast cancer mortality at seven years Lancet 335 1990 241 246
10. S. Shapiro, W. Venet, P. Strax Periodic screening of breast cancer the Health Insurance Plan Project and its sequelae, 1963-1988 1988 John Hopkins University Press Baltimore (MD)
11. L. Tabar, P.B. Dean, C.S. Kaufman A new era in the diagnosis of breast cancer Surg Oncol Clin N Am 9 2000 233 277
12. L. Tabar, B. Vitak, T.C. Hsiu-Hsi Beyond randomized control trials organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality Cancer 91 2001 1724 1731
13. R.E. Hendrick, R.A. Smith, J.H. Rutledge III, C.R. Smart Benefit of screening mammography in women ages 40-49 a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 1997 87 92
14. R.E. Bird, T.W. Wallace, B.C. Yankaskas Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography Radiology 184 1992 613 617
15. H.J. Burhenne, L.W. Burhenne, F. Goldberg Interval breast cancers in the screening mammography program of British Columbia analysis and classification Am J Roentgenol 162 1994 1067 1071
16. R. Holland, J.H.C.L. Hendriks, M. Mravunac Mammographically occult breast cancer a pathologic and radiologic study Cancer 52 1983 1810 1819
17. H.C. Burrell, D.M. Sibbering, A.R. Wilson Screening interval breast cancers mammographic features and prognosis factors Radiology 199 1996 811 817
18. A.B. Hollingsworth, L.D. Taylor, D.C. Rhodes Establishing a histologic basis for false-negative mammograms Am J Surg 166 1993 643 647
19. L. Ma, E. Fishell, B. Wright, W. Hanna Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 84 1992 781 785
20. K.C. Young, M.G. Wallis, R.G. Blanks Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers results from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Br J Radiol 70 1997 482 488
21. K.C. Young, M.G. Wallis, M.L. Ramsdale Mammographic film density and detection of small cancers Clin Radiol 49 1994 461 465
22. M.T. Mandelson, N. Oestricher, P.L. Porter Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 2000 1081 1087
23. V.P. Jackson, R.E. Hendrick, S.A. Feig Imaging of the radiographically dense breast Radiology 188 1993 297 301
24. H.C. Burrell, S.E. Pinder, A.R. Wilson The positive predictive value of mammographic signs a review of 425 nonpalpable breast lesions Clin Radiol 51 1996 277 281
25. S.P. Poplack, A.N. Tosteson, M.R. Grove, W.A. Wells, P.A. Carney Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire Mammography Network Radiology 209 1998 511 518
26. E. Lidbrink, J. Elfving, J. Frisell, E. Jonsson Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial BMJ 312 1996 273 276
27. M.B. Barton, S. Moore, S. Polk Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms; clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits J Gen Intern Med 16 2001 150 156
28. B.K. Rimer, L.G. Bluman The psychosocial consequences of mammography J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 1997 131 138
29. J.M. Lewin, C.J. D'Orsi, R.E. Hendrick Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer Am J Roentgenol 179 2002 671 677
30. J.M. Lewin, C.J. D'Orsi, P. Issacs, U. Moss, R.E. Hendrick Causes of differences between full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography interpretations in the Colorado/Massachusetts full-field digital mammography screening trial Radiology 217 P 2000 199
31. J.M. Lewin, R.E. Hendrick, C.J. D'Orsi Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection results of 4,945 paired examinations Radiology 218 2001 873 880
32. P.E. Undrill, A.D. O'Kane, F.J. Gilbert A comparison of digital and screen-film mammography using quality control phantoms Clin Radiol 55 2000 782 790
33. M. Liang, W.F. Lawrence, C.B. Burnett Acceptability of diagnostic imaging tests for breast center Breast Cancer Res Treat 79 2 2003 199 206
34. G.M. Newstead, M. Josein, C.A. Gelfand Comparison of analog and digital spot magnified mammography N. Karssemeijer M. Thijssen J. Hendriks L.V. Eming Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography 1998 Kluwer Academic Dordrecht (the Netherlands) 423 426
35. K.P. Hermann, S. Obenauer, M. Funke Magnification mammography a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications Eur Radiol 12 9 2002 2188 2191
36. U. Fischer, F. Baum, S. Obenauer Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications full-field digital mammography versus screen-film mammography Eur Radiol 12 11 2002 2679 2683
37. L.A. Venta, R.E. Hendrick, Y.T. Adler Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting Am J Roentgenol 176 2001 1241 1248
38. C.M. Kuzmiak, G.A. Millnamow, B. Qaqish Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast specimens Acad Radiol 9 12 2002 1378 1382
39. E.A. Berns, R.E. Hendrick, G.R. Cutter Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice Med Phys 29 5 2002 830 834
40. S. Obenauer, S. Luftner-Nagel, D. von Hayden Screen-film vs full-field digital mammography image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions Eur Radiol 12 7 2002 1697 1702
41. P. Skaane, A. Skjennald Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading randomized trial in a population-based screening program - the Oslo II study Radiology 232 2004 197 204
42. P. Skaane, K. Young, A. Skjenneld Population-based mammography screening comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study Radiology 229 2003 885 892
43. M. Mahesh AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Digital mammography: an overview Radiographics 24 2004 1747 1760
44. J.W. Leung New modalities in breast imaging digital mammography, positron emission tomography, and sestamibi scintimammography Radiol Clin N Am 40 3 2002 467 482
45. E.A. Berns, R.E. Hendrick, G.R. Cutter Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice Med Phys 29 2002 830 834
46. E.A. Berns, R.E. Hendrick, G.R. Cutter Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose Med Phys 30 2003 334 340
47. S. Obenauer, K.P. Hermann, E. Grabbe Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography an anthropomorphic breast phantom study Br J Radiol 76 2003 478 482
48. E.D. Pisano, E.B. Cole, B.M. Hemminger Image processing algorithms for digital mammography a pictorial essay Radiographics 20 2000 1479 1491
49. A.H. Baydush, C.E. Floyd Jr Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing Med Phys 27 7 2000 1503 1508
50. P. Heinlein, J. Drexl, W. Schneider Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 3 2003 402 413
51. W. Qian, F. Mao, X. Sun An improved method of region grouping for microcalcification detection in digital mammograms Comput Med Imaging Graph 26 6 2002 361 368
52. S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas, S. Vedantham Flat-panel digital mammography system contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images Radiology 225 3 2002 801 807
53. E.D. Pisano, E.B. Cole, S. Major Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display The International Digital Mammography Development Group Radiology 216 3 2000 820 830
54. E.D. Pisano, E.B. Cole, E.O. Kistner Interpretation of digital mammograms comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display Radiology 223 2 2002 483 488
55. T.E. Wilson, C. Wallace, M.A. Roubidoux Patient satisfaction with screening mammography online vs offline interpretation Acad Radiol 5 1998 771 778
56. M.H. Schreiber, M. Leonard, C.Y. Rieniets Disclosure of imaging findings to patients directly by radiologists survey of patients' preferences Am J Roentgenol 165 1995 467 469
57. S. Liu, L.W. Bassett, J. Sayre Women's attitudes about receiving mammographic results directly from radiologists Radiology 193 1994 783 786
58. N.C. Dolan, J. Feinglass, A. Priyanath Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting J Gen Intern Med 16 2001 157 162
59. W. Logan-Young The breast imaging center; successful management in today's environment Radiol Clin N Am 38 4 2000 853 860
60. J.R. Parikh Components of a breast-care center Decis Imaging Econ 15 8 2002 39 46
61. J.R. Parikh Breast center model puts emphasis on patients Diagn Imaging 24 4 suppl 2002 15 19
62. K.L. Lindfors, J.O. O'Connor, R.A. Parker False-positive screening mammograms effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress Radiology 218 2001 247 253
63. S.L. Lou, H.D. Lin, K.P. Lin, D. Hoogstrate Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications Comput Med Imaging Graph 24 2000 205 220
64. S.L. Lou, E.A. Sickles, H.K. Huang Full-field direct digital telemammography technical components, study protocols, and preliminary results IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 1 4 1997 270 278
65. E.O. Sheybani, R. Sankar ATMTN a telemammography network architecture IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49 12 2002 1438 1443
66. E.D. Pisano, B.C. Yankaskas, S.V. Ghate Patient compliance in mobile screening mammography Acad Radiol 2 1995 1067 1072
67. J. Legler, H.I. Meissner, C. Coyne The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11 2002 59 71
68. J.E. Brustrom, D.C. Hunter Going the distance how far will women travel to undergo free mammography? Mil Med 166 2001 347 349
69. American College of Radiology ACR Practice Guideline for the performance of whole breast digital mammography 2004 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)
70. E. Thurfjell, K.A. Lernewall, A.A.S. Taube Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program Radiology 191 1994 241 244
71. L. Tabar, G. Fagerberg, S. Duffy Update of the Swedish Two-County Program of Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer Radiol Clin N Am 30 1992 187 210
72. R.E. Bird Professional quality assurance for mammographic screening programs Radiology 177 1990 587
73. L.J. Warren Burhenne, S.A. Wood, C.J. D'Orsi Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography Radiology 215 2000 554 562
74. T.W. Freer, M.J. Ulissey Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography a prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center Radiology 217 2000 400
75. R.L. Birdwell, D.M. Ikeda, K.F. O'Shaughnessy, E.A. Sickles Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection Radiology 219 2001 192 202
76. G.M. te Brake, N. Karssemeijer, J.H. Hendriks An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms Phys Med Biol 45 10 2000 2843 2857
77. L. Li, R.A. Clark, J.A. Thomas Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography Acad Radiol 9 1 2002 4 12
78. G. Boccignone, A. Chianese, A. Picarello Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms Comput Biol Med 30 5 2000 267 286
79. F. Baum, U. Fischer, S. Obenauer, E. Grabbe Computer-assisted detection in direct digital full-field mammography initial results Eur Radiol 12 12 2002 3015 3017
80. Y. Jiang, R.M. Nishikawa, R.A. Schmidt, C.E. Metz, M.L. Giger, K. Doi Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis Acad Radiol 6 1999 22 33
81. S. Nawano, K. Murakami, N. Moriyama, H. Kobatake, H. Takeo, K. Shimura Computer-aided diagnosis in full digital mammography Invest Radiol 34 1999 310 316
82. J. Roehrig, R.A. Castellino The promise of computer aided detection in digital mammography Eur J Radiol 31 1997 35 39
83. G.M. Brake, N. Karssemeijer, J.H. Hendriks An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from tissue in digital mammograms Phys Med Biol 45 2000 2843 2857
84. I. Christoyianni, A. Koutras, E. Dermatas Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms Comput Med Imaging Graph 26 5 2002 309 319
85. M.K. Markey, J.Y. Lo, C.E. Floyd Jr Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications Radiology 223 2 2002 489 493
86. B. Verma, J. Zakos A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 5 1 2001 46 54
87. C.R. Boggis, S.M. Astley Computer-assisted mammographic screening Breast Cancer Res 2 6 2000 392 395
88. J.M. Lewin, P.K. Isaacs, V. Vance Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography feasibility Radiology 229 1 2003 261 268
89. R.A. Jong, M.J. Yaffe, M. Skarpathiokis Contrast-enhanced digital mammography initial clinical experience Radiology 228 3 2003 842 850
90. F. Diekmann, S. Diekman, M. Taupitz Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography - initial experience Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 175 3 2003 342 345
91. M. Skarpathiotakis, M.J. Yaffe, A.K. Bloomquist Development of contrast digital mammography Med Phys 29 10 2002 2419 2426
92. N. Weidner, J.P. Semple, W.R. Welch, J. Folkman Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis correlation in invasive breast carcinoma N Engl J Med 324 1991 1 7
93. L.D. Buadu, J. Murakami, S. Murayama Breast lesions correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis Radiology 200 1996 639 649
94. J.M. Boone, M.T. Tecotzky, G.M. Alexander A binary screen detector system for single pulse, dual energy radiography Radiology 183 1992 863 870
95. S.A. Feig, M.J. Yaffe Current status of digital mammography Semin Ultrasound CT MR 17 1996 424 443
96. L.T. Niklason, B.T. Christian, L.E. Niklason Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging Radiology 205 1997 399 406
97. R.E. Hendrick, S.H. Parker Principles of stereotactic mammography and quality assurance S.H. Parker W.E. Jobe Percutaneous breast biopsy 1993 Raven New York 49 459
98. G.M. Stevens, R.L. Birdwell, C.F. Beaulieu Circular tomosynthesis potential in imaging of breast and upper cervical spine - preliminary phantom and in vitro study Radiology 228 2 2003 569 575
99. S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas, S. Vedantam Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography Acad Radiol 8 3 2001 219 224
100. J.M. Destouet, M.L. Sheman The impact of mammography regulations on breast imaging practice costs Semin Breast Dis 4 2001 10 14
101. D.R. Enzmann, P.M. Anglada, C. Haviley Providing professional mammography services financial analysis Radiology 219 2001 469 473
102. S.A. Feig Economic challenges in breast imaging Radiol Clin N Am 38 4 2000 843 852
103. M.D. Hiatt, J.J. Carr, R.L. Manning The length of time necessary to break even after converting to digital mammography J Telemed Telecare 6 2000 222 224
104. M.W. Nields, R.R. Galaty Jr Digital mammography a model for assessing cost effectiveness Acad Radiol 5 suppl 2 1998 S310 S313
105. D.V. Beard Iterative interim techniques for reduced costs and a better mammography workstation an opinion J Digit Imaging 13 4 2000 170 174
106. J.R. Parikh, D. Fanus Implementing digital quality control in a breast center J Am Coll Radiol 1 11 2004 854 860
107. M.B. Williams, P.J. Goodale, P.F. Butler The current status of full-field digital mammography quality control J Am Coll Radiol 1 2004 936 951
108. J.R. Parikh Breast imaging flow models J Am Coll Radiol 1 4 2004 265 269